Dhakshineswar Suresh and Learner Tien will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Winston-Salem for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:00 pm on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Learner Tien who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Learner Tien is the pick to win this match.
Learner Tien -> 1.062
Dhakshineswar Suresh -> 7.7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Dhakshineswar Suresh vs. Learner Tien
There is no head to head record between Dhakshineswar Suresh and Learner Tien since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Dhakshineswar Suresh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 9-5 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-4 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Suresh got to the qualifications after beating Alexey Zakharov 7-6(5) 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Indian had a good straight sets win against Zakharov (7-65 6-2). During the match, Suresh scored 68 points vs Zakharov’s 54. Dhakshineswar was very aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Suresh managed to score 14 aces and he was extremely solid in conceding no double faults. Dhakshineswar Suresh was pretty effective on serve to win 92% (35/38) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Dhakshineswar broke Zakharov twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Suresh has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 52% of his matches (21-19). 3-3 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Suresh has an overall21-18 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Suresh has a compiled 3-3 win-loss record in 2024, 3-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Suresh has never competed in this tournament before.
Learner Tien
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 18-17 | 11-6 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 63-14 | 53-8 | 0-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-10 | 20-10 | 0-0 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 8-5 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 232 (career-high), Learner got to the qualifications after beating Andres Martin 7-6(2) 6-3.
In the qualifications, Tien had a good straight sets win against Martin (7-62 6-3). During the match Tien scored 76 points vs Martin’s 62. Learner was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Tien fired 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Learner Tien lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Tien put 69% of his first serves in, winning 69% (29/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (9/19) on the 2nd serve. Learner broke Martin 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
His best result of the year was winning the title the Bloomfield Hills Challenger where he overcame Nishesh Basavareddy in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Learner has an overall 35-5 win-loss record in 2024, 35-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Suresh | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 22 |
| Pts | 68-54 | 76-62 |
| Total Points | 122 | 138 |
| Winners | 35 | 29 |
| %Winners | 51% | 38% |
Both Suresh and Tien played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Suresh and Tien have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Suresh played 1 game less than Tien. Suresh scored 35 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 29 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Suresh | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 14 | 3 |
| 1st in | 38/57 | 42/61 |
| %1st in | 67% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 35/38 | 29/42 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 9/19 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 47% |
Suresh made 14 aces . Tien bagged 3 aces . Suresh won 92% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Tien won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Suresh | Tien |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 50% | 42% |
| Conceded | 2 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 100% | 25% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Dhakshineswar broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The Indian very solid his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. Tien broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Tien conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded.
| Suresh | |||
| Q1 Zakharov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 68-54 | 68-54 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 14 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 38/57 | 38/57 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 35/38 | 35/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Tien | |||
| Q1 Martin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 76-62 | 76-62 | |
| Total points | 138 | 138 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 42/61 | 42/61 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 29/42 | 29/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/19 | 9/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWW
LWLWWLLWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel EvansEvans – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Corentin MoutetMoutet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Adam WaltonWalton (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
