Zachary Svajda and Omni Kumar will face off in the qualifications of the Winston-Salem for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:00 pm on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zachary Svajda who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zachary Svajda is the pick to win this match.
Zachary Svajda -> 1.23
Omni Kumar -> 3.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zachary Svajda vs. Omni Kumar
This will be the 2nd time that Zachary Svajda and Omni Kumar fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Kumar (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Kumar won 6-2 3-0 ret. in the qualifications in the Las Vegas Challenger back in 2022.
Zachary Svajda
29 - 27win/loss
166
102
LWLLWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-35 | 27-21 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-24 | 28-8 | 2-6 | 10-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-23 | 25-14 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-13 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 110, Zachary reached the qualifications after defeating Martin Borisiouk 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Borisiouk (6-1 6-1). During the match, Svajda scored 56 points vs Borisiouk’s 32. Svajda was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Svajda scored 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Zachary Svajda was pretty effective on serve to win 78% (21/27) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Zachary broke Borisiouk 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Svajda has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (152-113). 21-15 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Svajda has a composed115-66 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Zachary’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger.
Svajda has an aggregate 29-26 win-loss record in 2024, 21-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Zachary has never competed in this tournament before.
Omni Kumar
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-23 | 29-16 | 7-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-32 | 54-31 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-36 | 47-29 | 1-1 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 75-29 | 73-27 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-10 | 16-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 429, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Ryan Seggerman 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Seggerman (6-1 6-4). During the match Kumar scored 57 points vs Seggerman’s 44. Kumar was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Kumar blasted 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Omni Kumar was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (22/29) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Omni broke Seggerman 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Kumar’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Santo Domingo and M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Kumar has an overall 17-13 win-loss record in 2024, 10-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Winston-Salem
Previously, his best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Svajda | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 17 |
| Pts | 56-32 | 57-44 |
| Total Points | 88 | 101 |
| Winners | 21 | 22 |
| %Winners | 38% | 39% |
Both Svajda and Kumar played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Svajda and Kumar have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Svajda played 3 games less than Kumar. Svajda scored 21 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Omni blasted 22 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Svajda | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 27/43 | 29/52 |
| %1st in | 63% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 22/29 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 13/23 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 57% |
Svajda blasted 3 aces . Kumar managed to score 3 aces . Svajda won 78% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Kumar won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Svajda | Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 71% | 50% |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Zachary broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Zachary pretty solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. Omni broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Omni conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Svajda | |||
| Q1 Borisiouk |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 56-32 | 56-32 | |
| Total points | 88 | 88 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 27/43 | 27/43 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 21/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kumar | |||
| Q1 Seggerman |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 57-44 | 57-44 | |
| Total points | 101 | 101 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 29/52 | 29/52 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 22/29 | 22/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLWLWW
LLLWLWWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel EvansEvans – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Corentin MoutetMoutet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Adam WaltonWalton (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
