Iga Swiatek and Mirra Andreeva will clash against each other in the quarter of the Western & Southern Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11:00 am on Center Court. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Iga Swiatek who should win in 2 sets.
Iga Swiatek -> 1.172
Mirra Andreeva -> 5.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Iga Swiatek vs. Mirra Andreeva
There is no head to head record between Iga Swiatek and Mirra Andreeva since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Iga Swiatek
55 - 6win/loss
2
1
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 64-9 | 29-5 | 26-2 | 7-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 68-11 | 42-8 | 19-2 | 0-0 | 7-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 67-9 | 42-6 | 18-1 | 5-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 36-15 | 18-10 | 12-2 | 2-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-5 | 6-4 | 7-1 | 3-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently world no. 1 Iga got to the quarter after beating Unknown Player bye, Varvara Gracheva 6-0 6-7(8) 6-2 and Marta Kostyuk 6-2 6-2.
In the 3rd round, Iga had a good straight sets win against Kostyuk (6-2 6-2). During the match, Swiatek scored 58 points vs Kostyuk’s 36. Iga was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Swiatek couldn’t to score even 1 ace and she committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Iga Swiatek was pretty efficient on serve to win 71% (22/31) of her 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Iga broke Kostyuk 5 times after converting 42% of her break points (5/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Pole has lost 1 set in this tournament to conquer 60% of the points she played.
Swiatek has a fantastic record in the last 9 years having won 82% of her matches (339-73). 24-3 on hard in 2024. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Swiatek has an aggregate157-40 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
Her best result of the season was winning the title in Australia where she overcame Angelique Kerber in the final 6-3 6-0 and in Doha where she defeated Elena Rybakina in the final 7-6(8) 6-2 and in Indian Wells where she beat Maria Sakkari in the final 6-4 6-0 and in Madrid where she defeated Aryna Sabalenka in the final 7-5 4-6 7-6(7) and in Rome where she beat Aryna Sabalenka in the final 6-2 6-3 and at the French Open where she overcame Jasmine Paolini in the final 6-2 6-1.
The Pole has an aggregate 54-6 win-loss record in 2024, 24-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cincinnati
Mirra Andreeva
25 - 12win/loss
16
16
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 34-16 | 18-9 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 36-9 | 7-4 | 23-4 | 0-0 | 6-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 39-9 | 21-5 | 18-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 24, Mirra reached the quarter after beating Emma Navarro 6-2 6-2, Karolina Pliskova 6-2 6-3 and Jasmine Paolini 3-6 6-3 6-2.
In the 3rd round against Paolini, Andreeva recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-2). During the match Andreeva scored 95 points vs Paolini’s 79. The Russian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Andreeva blasted 5 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Mirra Andreeva lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Andreeva put 63% of her first serves in, winning 73% (38/52) of the points behind her 1st serve and 47% (14/30) on the 2nd serve. The Russian broke Paolini 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Mirra has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points she played.
Her best result of the current year was winning the title in Iasi where she beat Elina Avanesyan in the final 5-7 7-5 4-0 ret..
Mirra has an aggregate 25-11 win-loss record in 2024, 9-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cincinnati
The Russian has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Swiatek | Andreeva |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 3 |
Tot Set | 5 | 7 |
Tot Games | 43 | 59 |
Pts | 158-104 | 231-172 |
Total Points | 262 | 403 |
Winners | 57 | 81 |
%Winners | 36% | 35% |
Swiatek played 2 matches while Andreeva competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Iga Swiatek conceded 1 set, while Mirra Andreeva surrendered 1 set. Swiatek has played 2 set(s) less than Andreeva (5 vs 7). Therefore, Swiatek played 16 games less than Andreeva. Iga scored 57 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Russian scored 81 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Swiatek | Andreeva |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 13 |
Avg per match | 3.5 | 4.3 |
1st in | 78/121 | 105/168 |
%1st in | 64% | 63% |
1st pts | 57/78 | 81/105 |
%1st pts | 73% | 77% |
2nd pts | 26/43 | 38/63 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 60% |
Swiatek recorded 7 aces (3.5 per match). Andreeva made 13 aces (4.3 per match). Swiatek won 73% points behind her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Andreeva won 77% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Swiatek | Andreeva |
---|---|---|
Won | 12 | 13 |
Converted | 12/28 | 13/29 |
% Converted | 43% | 45% |
Conceded | 4 | 7 |
Saved | 1 | 4 |
% Saved | 25% | 57% |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
The Pole broke her opponents 12 times with a 43% conversion rate. Iga dropped her serve 3 times and she saved 25% of the break points that she conceded. Andreeva broke her opponents 13 times with a 45% conversion rate. Mirra conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded.
Swiatek | ||||
R2 Gracheva | R3 Kostyuk | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-78 6-2 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 16 | 43 | |
pts | 100-68 | 58-36 | 158-104 | |
Total points | 168 | 94 | 262 | |
Winners | 35 | 22 | 57 | |
%Winners | 35% | 38% | 36% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 7 | 0 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 47/77 | 31/44 | 78/121 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 70% | 64% | |
1st pts | 35/47 | 22/31 | 57/78 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 71% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 18/30 | 8/13 | 26/43 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 62% | 60% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
Converted | 7/16 | 5/12 | 12/28 | |
Converted % | 44% | 42% | 43% | |
Conceded | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 0/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 33% | 0% | 17% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Andreeva | |||||
R1 Navarro | R2 Pliskova | R3 Paolini | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-2 6-3 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 17 | 26 | 59 | |
pts | 60-37 | 76-56 | 95-79 | 231-172 | |
Total points | 97 | 132 | 174 | 403 | |
Winners | 23 | 20 | 38 | 81 | |
%Winners | 38% | 26% | 40% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 2 | 6 | 5 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | |
1st in | 28/45 | 25/41 | 52/82 | 105/168 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 61% | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 23/28 | 20/25 | 38/52 | 81/105 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 80% | 73% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 11/17 | 13/16 | 14/30 | 38/63 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 81% | 47% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 5 | 13 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/13 | 5/8 | 13/29 | |
Converted % | 50% | 31% | 63% | 45% | |
Conceded | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 0/0 | 3/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Tennis Scores in Cincinnati
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Franco Emanuel EgeaEmanuel Egea (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Clement GeensGeens – Stephan FransenFransen (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Andrew WatsonWatson (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Stephan GerritsenGerritsen – Benjamin DhoeDhoe (3-6 6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (0-1) – H2H and prediction