Jannik Sinner and Jordan Thompson will clash against each other in the 3rd round of the Western & Southern Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 1:30 pm on Center Court. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jannik Sinner who should win in 2 sets.
Jannik Sinner -> 1.158
Jordan Thompson -> 5.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jannik Sinner vs. Jordan Thompson
There is no head to head record between Jannik Sinner and Jordan Thompson since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jannik Sinner
45 - 5win/loss
1
1
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 45-5 | 20-2 | 11-2 | 5-0 | 9-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 64-15 | 28-7 | 8-3 | 20-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 47-16 | 21-6 | 15-4 | 7-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 49-22 | 22-8 | 10-6 | 17-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 20-14 | 2-6 | 7-3 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently world no. 1 Sinner reached the 3rd round after defeating Unknown Player bye and Alex Michelsen 6-4 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Jannik had a good straight sets win against Michelsen (6-4 7-5). During the match, Sinner scored 86 points vs Michelsen’s 73. The Italian was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sinner scored 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Jannik Sinner was quite efficient on serve to win 74% (31/42) of his 1st serve and 61% (25/41) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Italian broke Michelsen twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Sinner has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 73% of his matches (318-118). 20-2 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Sinner has a composed118-43 record in the last 7 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was winning the title at the Australian Open where he overcame Daniil Medvedev in the final 3-6 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-3 and in Rotterdam where he overcame Alex De Minaur in the final 7-5 6-4 and in Miami where he overcame Grigor Dimitrov in the final 6-3 6-1 and in Halle where he defeated Hubert Hurkacz in the final 7-6(8) 7-6(2).
The Italian has an overall 45-5 win-loss record in 2024, 20-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cincinnati
Jordan Thompson
28 - 19win/loss
32
30
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 28-19 | 19-10 | 3-5 | 2-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-28 | 22-15 | 0-3 | 7-4 | 12-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-26 | 18-14 | 2-6 | 8-1 | 12-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-25 | 10-11 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 2-2 |
2020 | 12-13 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 32, the Australian got to the 3rd round after defeating Ugo Humbert 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) and Sebastian Baez 6-2 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Thompson had a good straight sets win against Baez (6-2 6-4). During the match Thompson scored 64 points vs Baez’s 43. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Thompson recorded 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jordan Thompson lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Thompson put 46% of his first serves in, winning 76% (19/25) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (12/29) on the 2nd serve. Jordan broke Baez 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jordan has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
His best result of the year was winning the title in Los Cabos where he defeated Casper Ruud in the final 6-3 7-6(4).
The Australian has a composed 28-19 win-loss record in 2024, 19-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cincinnati
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Sinner | Thompson |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
Tot Games | 22 | 49 |
Pts | 86-73 | 160-136 |
Total Points | 159 | 296 |
Winners | 31 | 64 |
%Winners | 36% | 40% |
Sinner played 1 match while Thompson competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Jordan Thompson dropped 1 set while Jannik Sinner hasn’t lost a set so far. Sinner has played 3 set(s) less than Thompson (2 vs 5). Therefore, Sinner played 27 games less than Thompson. The Italian scored 31 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Jordan fired 64 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Sinner | Thompson |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 9 |
Avg per match | 9 | 4.5 |
1st in | 42/83 | 81/145 |
%1st in | 51% | 56% |
1st pts | 31/42 | 64/81 |
%1st pts | 74% | 79% |
2nd pts | 25/41 | 31/64 |
%2nd pts | 61% | 48% |
Sinner bagged 9 aces . Thompson scored 9 aces (4.5 per match). Sinner won 74% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Thompson won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Sinner | Thompson |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 8 |
Converted | 2/5 | 8/14 |
% Converted | 40% | 57% |
Conceded | 8 | 8 |
Saved | 8 | 3 |
% Saved | 100% | 38% |
Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Sinner broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The Italian pretty solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 8 break points. Jordan broke his opponents 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. Jordan conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded.
Sinner | |||
R2 Michelsen | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 86-73 | 86-73 | |
Total points | 159 | 159 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 42/83 | 42/83 | |
% 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
1st pts | 31/42 | 31/42 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 25/41 | 25/41 | |
% 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 8/8 | 8 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Thompson | ||||
R1 Humbert | R2 Baez | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-3 7-64 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 18 | 49 | |
pts | 96-93 | 64-43 | 160-136 | |
Total points | 189 | 107 | 296 | |
Winners | 45 | 19 | 64 | |
%Winners | 47% | 30% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
1st in | 56/91 | 25/54 | 81/145 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 46% | 56% | |
1st pts | 45/56 | 19/25 | 64/81 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 76% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 19/35 | 12/29 | 31/64 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 41% | 48% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
Converted | 2/6 | 6/8 | 8/14 | |
Converted % | 33% | 75% | 57% | |
Conceded | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 2/5 | 3 | |
Saved % | 33% | 40% | 73% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Tennis Scores in Cincinnati
- Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta – Max PurcellPurcell (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Arthur FilsFils (7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Luciano DarderiDarderi (7-64 3-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Ben SheltonShelton – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-76 7-67 6-3) – See score progression
- Holger RuneRune – Nuno BorgesBorges (6-3 7-68) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Marcelo Arevalo/Mate PavicArevalo/Mate Pavic – Marcelo Melo/Alexander ZverevMelo/Alexander Zverev (6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (3-6 7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Arthur Fils/Nicolas JarryFils/Nicolas Jarry – Rohan Bopanna/Matthew EbdenBopanna/Matthew Ebden (6-4 6-75 10-8) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Sebastian BaezBaez (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Arthur FilsFils (7-5 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Andrey RublevRublev – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Ben SheltonShelton – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-7(6) 7-6(7) 6-3) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Holger RuneRune – Nuno BorgesBorges (6-3 7-6(8)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Flavio CobolliCobolli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (4-4) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Andrey RublevRublev (1-2) – H2H and prediction