Iga Swiatek and Marta Kostyuk will play each other in the 3rd round of the Western & Southern Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:00 am on Center Court. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Iga Swiatek who should win in 2 sets.
Iga Swiatek -> 1.069
Marta Kostyuk -> 8.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Iga Swiatek vs. Marta Kostyuk
This will be the 3rd time that Iga Swiatek and Marta Kostyuk square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Swiatek (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Swiatek won 6-2 6-1 in the semifinal in Indian Wells back in March 2024.
Highlights Iga Swiatek vs Marta Kostyuk – Indian Wells 15-March-2024
Iga Swiatek
53 - 6win/loss
1
1
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 53-6 | 23-3 | 26-2 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 68-11 | 42-8 | 19-2 | 0-0 | 7-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 67-9 | 42-6 | 18-1 | 5-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 36-15 | 18-10 | 12-2 | 2-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-5 | 6-4 | 7-1 | 3-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently world no. 1 Swiatek got to the 3rd round after defeating Unknown Player bye and Varvara Gracheva 6-0 6-7(8) 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Iga defeated Gracheva (6-0 6-78 6-2). During the match, Swiatek scored 100 points vs Gracheva’s 68. Swiatek was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Swiatek recorded 7 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Iga Swiatek was pretty effective on serve to win 74% (35/47) of her 1st serve and 60% (18/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. The Pole broke Gracheva 7 times after converting 44% of her break points (7/16).
Swiatek has a fantastic match record in the last 9 years having won 82% of her matches (338-73). 23-3 on hard in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Swiatek has an overall156-40 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
Her best result of the current year was winning the title in Australia where she defeated Angelique Kerber in the final 6-3 6-0 and in Doha where she overcame Elena Rybakina in the final 7-6(8) 6-2 and in Indian Wells where she beat Maria Sakkari in the final 6-4 6-0 and in Madrid where she defeated Aryna Sabalenka in the final 7-5 4-6 7-6(7) and in Rome where she defeated Aryna Sabalenka in the final 6-2 6-3 and at the French Open where she beat Jasmine Paolini in the final 6-2 6-1.
Swiatek has an overall 53-6 win-loss record in 2024, 23-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cincinnati
Marta Kostyuk
29 - 15win/loss
21
16
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-15 | 19-7 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-22 | 22-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 28-20 | 18-11 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 25-17 | 8-9 | 10-4 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 27-12 | 16-6 | 7-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 21, Marta reached the 3rd round after defeating Elise Mertens 6-4 2-6 6-4 and Lulu Sun 6-3 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Marta had a good straight sets win against Sun (6-3 7-5). During the match Kostyuk scored 80 points vs Sun’s 68. The Ukrainian was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Kostyuk scored 8 aces and she was not very consistent on her 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Marta Kostyuk lost the serve twice and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Kostyuk put 65% of her first serves in, winning 71% (34/48) of the points behind her 1st serve and 42% (11/26) on the 2nd serve. Kostyuk broke Sun 4 times after converting 40% of her break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Marta has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points she played.
Marta’s best result of the year was reaching the final in San Diego and Stuttgart.
The Ukrainian has an aggregate 29-15 win-loss record in 2024, 19-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cincinnati
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Swiatek | Kostyuk |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 3 | 5 |
Tot Games | 27 | 49 |
Pts | 100-68 | 168-162 |
Total Points | 168 | 330 |
Winners | 35 | 71 |
%Winners | 35% | 42% |
Swiatek played 1 match while Kostyuk competed in 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Iga Swiatek surrendered 1 set, while Marta Kostyuk dropped 1 set. Swiatek has played 2 set(s) less than Kostyuk (3 vs 5). Therefore, Swiatek played 22 games less than Kostyuk. Swiatek scored 35 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Marta struck 71 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Swiatek | Kostyuk |
---|---|---|
Aces | 7 | 12 |
Avg per match | 7 | 6 |
1st in | 47/77 | 106/176 |
%1st in | 61% | 60% |
1st pts | 35/47 | 71/106 |
%1st pts | 74% | 67% |
2nd pts | 18/30 | 33/70 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 47% |
Swiatek scored 7 aces . Kostyuk blasted 12 aces (6 per match). Swiatek won 74% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Kostyuk won 67% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Swiatek | Kostyuk |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 7 |
Converted | 7/16 | 7/19 |
% Converted | 44% | 37% |
Conceded | 3 | 19 |
Saved | 1 | 14 |
% Saved | 33% | 74% |
Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Swiatek broke her opponent 7 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Pole conceded her serve twice and she saved 33% of the break points that she conceded. The Ukrainian broke her opponents 7 times with a 37% conversion rate. Kostyuk conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 74% of the break points that she conceded.
Swiatek | |||
R2 Gracheva | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-78 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 100-68 | 100-68 | |
Total points | 168 | 168 | |
Winners | 35 | 35 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 47/77 | 47/77 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 35/47 | 35/47 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 18/30 | 18/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/16 | 7/16 | |
Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Kostyuk | ||||
R1 Mertens | R2 Sun | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 21 | 49 | |
pts | 88-94 | 80-68 | 168-162 | |
Total points | 182 | 148 | 330 | |
Winners | 37 | 34 | 71 | |
%Winners | 42% | 43% | 42% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 4 | 8 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 12 | 11 | 23 | |
1st in | 58/102 | 48/74 | 106/176 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 65% | 60% | |
1st pts | 37/58 | 34/48 | 71/106 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 71% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 22/44 | 11/26 | 33/70 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 42% | 47% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Converted | 3/9 | 4/10 | 7/19 | |
Converted % | 33% | 40% | 37% | |
Conceded | 10 | 9 | 19 | |
Saved | 7/10 | 7/9 | 14 | |
Saved % | 70% | 78% | 148% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Tennis Scores in Cincinnati
- Liudmila SamsonovaSamsonova – Magda LinetteLinette (7-610 6-1) – See score progression
- Mirra AndreevaAndreeva – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (2-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Cori GauffGauff (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Leylah Annie FernandezAnnie Fernandez – Elena RybakinaRybakina (3-6 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Elina SvitolinaSvitolina – Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Diana ShnaiderShnaider – Ashlyn KruegerKrueger (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Daria KasatkinaKasatkina (6-1 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Lulu SunSun (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Varvara GrachevaGracheva (6-0 6-78 6-2) – See score progression
- Franco Emanuel EgeaEmanuel Egea – Bart StevensStevens (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Benjamin DhoeDhoe – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Stephan GerritsenGerritsen – Ryan NijboerNijboer (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Mats HermansHermans (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Clement GeensGeens – Luca GelhardtGelhardt (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Stephan FransenFransen – Marc GinerGiner (6-74 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Guy Den HeijerDen Heijer (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Mirra AndreevaAndreeva – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (7-6(2) 6-3) – See score progression
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Daria KasatkinaKasatkina (6-1 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Anna KalinskayaKalinskaya (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Cori GauffGauff (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Karolina MuchovaMuchova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qinwen ZhengZheng – Magdalena FrechFrech (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline WozniackiWozniacki – Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova (7-1) – H2H and prediction
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Marta KostyukKostyuk (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Elina SvitolinaSvitolina (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (3-1) – H2H and prediction