Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Stefanos Tsitsipas who should win in 3 sets.
Stefanos Tsitsipas -> 1.53
Jack Draper -> 2.51
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Stefanos Tsitsipas vs. Jack Draper
This will be the 2nd time that Stefanos Tsitsipas and Jack Draper face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Draper (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Draper won 7-5 7-6(4) in the 2nd round in Montreal back in 2022.
Highlights Jack Draper vs Stefanos Tsitsipas – Montreal 10-August-2022
Stefanos Tsitsipas
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 22-18 | 12-10 | 7-5 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 45-22 | 13-11 | 22-6 | 8-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-24 | 19-9 | 17-5 | 11-6 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 61-24 | 18-8 | 17-4 | 18-9 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 55-19 | 26-8 | 23-5 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 11, Stefanos got to the 2nd round after defeating Jan-Lennard Struff 4-6 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Struff, Tsitsipas recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-3). During the match, Tsitsipas scored 102 points vs Struff’s 88. Stefanos was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tsitsipas fired 18 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Stefanos Tsitsipas was pretty effective on serve to win 81% (38/47) of his 1st serve and 57% (21/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Stefanos broke Struff 3 times after converting 21% of his break points (3/14).
Tsitsipas has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 69% of his matches (480-218). 11-7 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Tsitsipas has a composed 179-92 record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the season was conquering the title in Carlo where he beat Casper Ruud in the final 6-1 6-4.
Tsitsipas has a composed 36-15 win-loss record in 2024, 11-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cincinnati
Jack Draper
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-9 | 14-3 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-22 | 19-10 | 5-7 | 7-3 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 28, Draper reached the 2nd round after defeating Jaume Antoni Munar Clar 7-5 3-6 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, Draper defeated Munar Clar (7-5 3-6 7-65).During the match Draper scored less points (2) than Munar Clar. In fact, the world no. 11 won 99 points vs Munar Clar’s. That means that Draper was more focused during the important points. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 45 winners.
About the serving games, Draper struck 13 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jack Draper lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Draper put 60% of his first serves in, winning 73% (45/62) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (20/41) on the 2nd serve. Draper broke Munar Clar 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
His best result of the season was conquering the title in Stuttgart where he defeated Matteo Berrettini in the final 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
The Brit has a composed 23-16 win-loss record in 2024, 10-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Cincinnati
Jack has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tsitsipas | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 34 |
| Pts | 102-88 | 99-101 |
| Total Points | 190 | 200 |
| Winners | 38 | 45 |
| %Winners | 37% | 45% |
Both Tsitsipas and Draper played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Stefanos Tsitsipas surrendered 1 set, while Jack Draper dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Tsitsipas and Draper have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Tsitsipas played 5 games less than Draper. The Greek scored 38 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Jack blasted 45 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tsitsipas | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 18 | 13 |
| 1st in | 47/84 | 62/103 |
| %1st in | 56% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 38/47 | 45/62 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 21/37 | 20/41 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 49% |
Tsitsipas scored 18 aces . Draper made 13 aces . Tsitsipas won 81% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Draper won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tsitsipas | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/14 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 21% | 80% |
| Conceded | 5 | 7 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 60% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Tsitsipas broke his opponent 3 times with a 21% conversion rate. Tsitsipas surrendered his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Jack conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tsitsipas | |||
| R1 Struff | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 102-88 | 102-88 | |
| Total points | 190 | 190 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 18 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 47/84 | 47/84 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 38/47 | 38/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/37 | 21/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/14 | 3/14 | |
| Converted % | 21% | 21% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Draper | |||
| R1 Munar Clar | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 3-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 99-101 | 99-101 | |
| Total points | 200 | 200 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 62/103 | 62/103 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 45/62 | 45/62 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/41 | 20/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Cincinnati
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (7-62 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Sebastian BaezBaez (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (4-2) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Andrey RublevRublev (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Jiri LeheckaLehecka (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (4-4) – H2H and prediction
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Grigor DimitrovDimitrov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Nuno BorgesBorges (1-0) – H2H and prediction