Bernard Tomic and Jay Clarke will square off in the 2nd round of the Santo Domingo Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 7:00 pm on ESTADIO MITUR. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jay Clarke who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jay Clarke is the pick to win this match.
Jay Clarke -> 1.65
Bernard Tomic -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bernard Tomic vs. Jay Clarke
This will be the 3rd time that Bernard Tomic and Jay Clarke clash against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Tomic and Clarke (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Clarke won 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 in the 1st round in the Mexico City Challenger back in 2022.
Bernard Tomic
37 - 19win/loss
207
17
LLWWLWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-26 | 33-18 | 12-5 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-27 | 35-19 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-12 | 24-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-12 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 250, Bernard got to the 2nd round after defeating Nick Hardt 2-6 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Hardt, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-4 6-3). During the match, Tomic scored 79 points vs Hardt’s 78. Bernard was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tomic bagged 3 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Bernard Tomic lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Tomic put 65% of his first serves in, winning 66% (35/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the 2nd serve. The Australian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Hardt 3 times.
Tomic has good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (243-191). 11-4 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Tomic has an aggregate 35-44 match record in the last years on clay.
Tomic’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Chennai,M25 Xalapa and M25 Tulsa.
Tomic has a composed 36-19 win-loss record in 2024, 11-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Santo Domingo Challenger
Jay Clarke
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51-26 | 6-3 | 41-18 | 3-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-19 | 10-12 | 21-4 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-27 | 11-12 | 3-4 | 7-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-28 | 7-7 | 8-14 | 3-3 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-11 | 4-5 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 298, Jay reached the 2nd round after beating Kiranpal Pannu 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Pannu (6-3 6-1). During the match Clarke scored 56 points vs Pannu’s 33. Jay was very aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Clarke blasted 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jay Clarke was extremely effective on serve to win 86% (19/22) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Pannu 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Jay’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Hammamet,M15 Rovinj,M25 Santa Margherita di Pula and M25 Kiseljak.
Jay has an aggregate 38-19 win-loss record in 2024, 34-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Santo Domingo Challenger
Jay has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tomic | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 16 |
| Pts | 79-78 | 56-33 |
| Total Points | 157 | 89 |
| Winners | 35 | 19 |
| %Winners | 44% | 34% |
Both Tomic and Clarke played 1 match. At the moment, Bernard Tomic dropped 1 set while Jay Clarke hasn’t dropped a set so far. Tomic has played 1 set more than Clarke (3 vs 2). Therefore, Tomic played 11 games more than Clarke. Tomic scored 35 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit struck 19 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tomic | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 6 |
| 1st in | 53/82 | 22/43 |
| %1st in | 65% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 35/53 | 19/22 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 13/21 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 62% |
Tomic fired 3 aces . Clarke managed to score 6 aces . Tomic won 66% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Clarke won 86% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tomic | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/3 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 100% | 80% |
| Conceded | 4 | 0 |
| Saved | 2 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. Tomic conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Clarke broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Jay was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Tomic | |||
| R1 Hardt |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 79-78 | 79-78 | |
| Total points | 157 | 157 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 53/82 | 53/82 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 35/53 | 35/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 17/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Clarke | |||
| R1 Pannu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 56-33 | 56-33 | |
| Total points | 89 | 89 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 22/43 | 22/43 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 19/22 | 19/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWWL
LWWWWWLLWW Tennis Scores in Santo Domingo Challenger
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Liam DraxlDraxl (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Nick HardtHardt (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Kiranpal PannuPannu (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Carlos Prado AngeloCarlos Prado Angelo – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Ignacio BuseBuse – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Federico CoriaCoria (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Mateus AlvesAlves (6-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Mariano KestelboimKestelboim – Pedro CachinCachin (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Peter BertranBertran (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (7-65 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Laslo DjereDjere – Maxime JanvierJanvier (7-63 7-65) – See score progression
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dmitry PopkoPopko – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Bernard TomicTomic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
