Vadym Ursu and Hazem Naow will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on COURT 12. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hazem Naow who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hazem Naow is the pick to win this match.
Hazem Naow -> 1.54
Vadym Ursu -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Vadym Ursu vs. Hazem Naow
There is no head to head record between Vadym Ursu and Hazem Naow since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Vadym Ursu
29 - 21win/loss
384
299
LWLWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 43-34 | 40-28 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-12 | 34-9 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 309 (career-high), Vadym reached the 2nd round after defeating Alexis Gautier 4-6 7-5 6-0.
In the 1st round against Gautier, Ursu recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-5 6-0). During the match, Ursu scored 107 points vs Gautier’s 82. The Ukrainian was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ursu fired 8 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Vadym Ursu lost the serve 5 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Ursu put 58% of his first serves in, winning 65% (35/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 51% (20/39) on the 2nd serve. Ursu broke Gautier 8 times after converting 44% of his break points (8/18).
Ursu has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (141-102). 26-14 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ursu has an overall91-51 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Ukrainian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh.
Vadym has an overall 29-20 win-loss record in 2024, 26-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Hazem Naow
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|
Ranked no. 340, Hazem reached the 2nd round after beating Omar Jasika 6-1 7-5.
In the 1st round, Naow had a good straight sets win against Jasika (6-1 7-5). During the match Naow scored 81 points vs Jasika’s 59. Naow was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Naow bagged 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Hazem Naow lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Naow put 62% of his first serves in, winning 68% (25/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the 2nd serve. Hazem broke Jasika 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Hazem’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Kish Island and M15 Metzingen.
Naow has an aggregate 33-16 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Naow has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ursu | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 19 |
| Pts | 107-82 | 81-59 |
| Total Points | 189 | 140 |
| Winners | 35 | 25 |
| %Winners | 33% | 31% |
Both Ursu and Naow played 1 match. At the moment, Vadym Ursu dropped 1 set while Hazem Naow hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Ursu has played 1 set more than Naow (3 vs 2). Therefore, Ursu played 9 games more than Naow. Vadym scored 35 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Syrian bagged 25 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ursu | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 2 |
| 1st in | 54/93 | 37/60 |
| %1st in | 58% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 35/54 | 25/37 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 20/39 | 13/23 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 57% |
Ursu fired 8 aces . Naow recorded 2 aces . Ursu won 65% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Naow won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ursu | Naow |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 8 | 6 |
| Converted | 8/18 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 44% | 50% |
| Conceded | 15 | 7 |
| Saved | 10 | 5 |
| % Saved | 67% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
Vadym broke his opponent 8 times with a 44% conversion rate. Ursu dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Hazem broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Syrian conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ursu | |||
| R1 Gautier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-5 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 107-82 | 107-82 | |
| Total points | 189 | 189 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 54/93 | 54/93 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 35/54 | 35/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/39 | 20/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/18 | 8/18 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 10/15 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Naow | |||
| R1 Jasika |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 81-59 | 81-59 | |
| Total points | 140 | 140 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/60 | 37/60 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 25/37 | 25/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWWW
Tennis Scores in Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Charles BroomBroom (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Mark LajalLajal – Giovanni OradiniOradini (6-3 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Norbert GombosGombos – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (6-4 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Oscar WeightmanWeightman – Aleksandre BakshiBakshi (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Marcel KamrowskiKamrowski (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Hazem NaowNaow – Omar JasikaJasika (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Martyn PawelskiPawelski (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Benoit PairePaire – Timofey SkatovSkatov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – August HolmgrenHolmgren (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Robin BertrandBertrand (2-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos – Kacper ZukZuk (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Vadym UrsuUrsu – Alexis GautierGautier (4-6 7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (6-74 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – Benoit PairePaire (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Manuel GuinardGuinard (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vadym UrsuUrsu – Hazem NaowNaow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos – Laurent LokoliLokoli (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Oscar WeightmanWeightman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
