Dominic Stricker and Mark Lajal will square off in the 2^nd round of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 12. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dominic Stricker who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Dominic Stricker is the pick to win this match.
Dominic Stricker -> 1.55
Mark Lajal -> 2.35

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Dominic Stricker vs. Mark Lajal

There is no head to head record between Dominic Stricker and Mark Lajal since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.

Dominic Stricker

Ranked no. 190, Dominic reached the 2^nd round after defeating Ramkumar Ramanathan 5-7 6-3 6-4.

In the 1^st round against Ramanathan, Dominic recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-3 6-4). During the match, Stricker scored 112 points vs Ramanathan’s 97. Stricker was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.

Regarding the service games, Stricker bagged 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Dominic Stricker lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Stricker put 43% of his first serves in, winning 69% (29/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (34/55) on the 2nd serve. Dominic broke Ramanathan 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).

Stricker has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (109-81). 1-0 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Stricker has an overall11-9 match record in the last 7 years on hard.

The Swiss has a composed 2-6 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger

The Swiss has never competed in this tournament before.

Mark Lajal

Ranked no. 255, Mark reached the 2^nd round after beating Giovanni Oradini 6-3 3-6 7-5.

In the 1^st round, Lajal defeated Oradini (6-3 3-6 7-5). During the match Lajal scored 102 points vs Oradini’s 93. Lajal was pretty aggressive to blast 47 winners.

About the serving games, Lajal bagged 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Mark Lajal lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Lajal put 69% of his first serves in, winning 82% (47/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (11/26) on the 2nd serve. The Estonian broke Oradini 3 times after converting 19% of his break points (3/16).

Lajal’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Shenzhen 1 Challenger.

The Estonian has a compiled 20-19 win-loss record in 2024, 13-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Stricker	Lajal
Match played	1	1
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	31	30
Pts	112-97	102-93
Total Points	209	195
Winners	29	47
%Winners	26%	46%

Both Stricker and Lajal played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Dominic Stricker dropped 1 set, while Mark Lajal dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Stricker and Lajal have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Stricker played 1 game more than Lajal. Stricker scored 29 winners (26% of the total points). On the other side, The Estonian blasted 47 winners (46%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Stricker	Lajal
Aces	4	7
Avg per match	4	7
1st in	42/97	57/83
%1st in	43%	69%
1st pts	29/42	47/57
%1st pts	69%	82%
2nd pts	34/55	11/26
%2nd pts	62%	42%

Stricker blasted 4 aces . Lajal bagged 7 aces . Stricker won 69% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Lajal won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Stricker	Lajal
Won	5	3
Converted	5/9	3/16
% Converted	56%	19%
Conceded	9	7
Saved	5	5
% Saved	56%	71%
Times Broken	4	2

The Swiss broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Stricker conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. The Estonian broke his opponent 3 times with a 19% conversion rate. Mark conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.

Stricker
	R1 Ramanathan	Total
Score	5-7 6-3 6-4
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	31	31
pts	112-97	112-97
Total points	209	209
Winners	29	29
%Winners	26%	26%
SERVE
Aces	4	4
Double Faults	4	4
1st in	42/97	42/97
% 1st in	43%	43%
1st pts	29/42	29/42
% 1st pts	69%	69%
2nd pts	34/55	34/55
% 2nd pts	62%	62%
Breaks
Won	5	5
Converted	5/9	5/9
Converted %	56%	56%
Conceded	9	9
Saved	5/9	5
Saved %	56%	56%
Times Broken	4	4

Lajal
	R1 Oradini	Total
Score	6-3 3-6 7-5
Tot Set	3	3
Tot Games	30	30
pts	102-93	102-93
Total points	195	195
Winners	47	47
%Winners	46%	46%
SERVE
Aces	7	7
Double Faults	3	3
1st in	57/83	57/83
% 1st in	69%	69%
1st pts	47/57	47/57
% 1st pts	82%	82%
2nd pts	11/26	11/26
% 2nd pts	42%	42%
Breaks
Won	3	3
Converted	3/16	3/16
Converted %	19%	19%
Conceded	7	7
Saved	5/7	5
Saved %	71%	71%
Times Broken	2	2

Tennis Scores in Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger

• Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Charles BroomBroom (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
• Laurent LokoliLokoli – August HolmgrenHolmgren (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Oscar WeightmanWeightman – Aleksandre BakshiBakshi (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
• Hazem NaowNaow – Omar JasikaJasika (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
• Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Marcel KamrowskiKamrowski (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
• Vit KoprivaKopriva – Martyn PawelskiPawelski (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
• Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Robin BertrandBertrand (2-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
• Michael GeertsGeerts – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
• Dominic StrickerStricker – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Mark LajalLajal – Giovanni OradiniOradini (6-3 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
• Vadym UrsuUrsu – Alexis GautierGautier (4-6 7-5 6-0) – See score progression
• Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
• Manuel GuinardGuinard – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (6-7⁴ 6-0 6-3) – See score progression
• Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos – Kacper ZukZuk (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
• Vit KoprivaKopriva – Martyn PawelskiPawelski (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
• Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Charles BroomBroom (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
• Michael GeertsGeerts – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
• Hazem NaowNaow – Omar JasikaJasika (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
• Oscar WeightmanWeightman – Aleksandre BakshiBakshi (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
• Mark LajalLajal – Giovanni OradiniOradini (6-3 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
• Dominic StrickerStricker – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
• Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Robin BertrandBertrand (2-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
• Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Marcel KamrowskiKamrowski (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
• Laurent LokoliLokoli – August HolmgrenHolmgren (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Benoit PairePaire – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
• Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Michael GeertsGeerts – Manuel GuinardGuinard (2-0) – H2H and prediction
• Vadym UrsuUrsu – Hazem NaowNaow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos – Laurent LokoliLokoli (0-1) – H2H and prediction
• Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Oscar WeightmanWeightman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Vit KoprivaKopriva – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
• Daniil GlinkaGlinka – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction