Norbert Gombos and Kristjan Tamm will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 12. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Norbert Gombos who should win in 2 sets.
Norbert Gombos -> 1.28
Kristjan Tamm -> 3.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Norbert Gombos vs. Kristjan Tamm
There is no head to head record between Norbert Gombos and Kristjan Tamm since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Norbert Gombos
11 - 15win/loss
681
80
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-15 | 2-0 | 10-13 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-23 | 2-4 | 11-10 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-28 | 7-3 | 28-17 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-30 | 0-9 | 13-10 | 12-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-11 | 6-4 | 2-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 563, Gombos got to the qualifications after defeating Courtney John Lock 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Norbert had a good straight sets win against John Lock (6-3 6-2). During the match, Gombos scored 69 points vs John Lock’s 47. The Slovakian was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gombos scored 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Norbert Gombos was very effective on serve to win 73% (22/30) of his 1st serve and 76% (13/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Norbert broke John Lock 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Gombos has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (297-263). 1-0 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gombos has an aggregate 61-59 record in the last years on hard.
Norbert has a composed 11-15 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Norbert has never competed in this tournament before.
Kristjan Tamm
12 - 16win/loss
827
625
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-17 | 10-13 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-13 | 6-4 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-32 | 30-23 | 11-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-14 | 2-7 | 0-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-11 | 11-6 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 827, Kristjan reached the qualifications after beating Lukas Pokorny 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Pokorny (6-4 6-1). During the match Tamm scored 66 points vs Pokorny’s 50. Tamm was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Tamm blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Kristjan Tamm lost the serve twice and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Tamm put 65% of his first serves in, winning 74% (29/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (8/21) on the 2nd serve. The Estonian broke Pokorny 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The Estonian has an aggregate 12-16 win-loss record in 2024, 10-12 on hard (See FULL STATS)
.H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gombos | Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 |
| Pts | 69-47 | 66-50 |
| Total Points | 116 | 116 |
| Winners | 22 | 29 |
| %Winners | 32% | 44% |
Both Gombos and Tamm played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gombos and Tamm have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (17). Gombos scored 22 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Kristjan scored 29 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gombos | Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 3 |
| 1st in | 30/47 | 39/60 |
| %1st in | 64% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 22/30 | 29/39 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 8/21 |
| %2nd pts | 76% | 38% |
Gombos struck 8 aces . Tamm managed to score 3 aces . Gombos won 73% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 76% of the points. On the other side, Tamm won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gombos | Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 44% | 56% |
| Conceded | 0 | 11 |
| Saved | 0 | 9 |
| % Saved | 0% | 82% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Norbert broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Gombos extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Estonian broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Tamm conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gombos | |||
| Q1 John | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 69-47 | 69-47 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 30/47 | 30/47 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 22/30 | 22/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 13/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Tamm | |||
| Q1 Pokorny | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 66-50 | 66-50 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 39/60 | 39/60 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 29/39 | 29/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/21 | 8/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 9/11 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 82% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Laurent LokoliLokoli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GautierGautier – Vadym UrsuUrsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristjan TammTamm – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Edison AmbarzumjanAmbarzumjan – Aleksandre BakshiBakshi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar WeightmanWeightman – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction