Iannis Miletich and Daniil Glinka will square off in the qualifications of the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniil Glinka who should win in 2 sets.
Daniil Glinka -> 1.141
Iannis Miletich -> 5.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Iannis Miletich vs. Daniil Glinka
There is no head to head record between Iannis Miletich and Daniil Glinka since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Iannis Miletich
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-12 | 1-3 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-13 | 0-0 | 17-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Miletich got to the qualifications after defeating Jose Statham 7-6(7) 7-5.
In the qualifications, Miletich had a good straight sets win against Statham (7-67 7-5). During the match, Miletich scored 80 points vs Statham’s 67. The Argentine was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Regarding the service games, Miletich made 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Iannis Miletich was very effective on serve to win 78% (29/37) of his 1st serve and 74% (23/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Iannis broke Statham twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Miletich has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 62% of his matches (42-26). 1-2 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Miletich has a composed1-2 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
Iannis has an overall 21-11 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger
Iannis has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniil Glinka
24 - 23win/loss
421
419
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-23 | 10-11 | 0-1 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-11 | 10-8 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 421, Glinka got to the qualifications after defeating Alan Bojarski 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Daniil had a good straight sets win against Bojarski (6-3 6-4). During the match Glinka scored 63 points vs Bojarski’s 53. Glinka was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Glinka managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniil Glinka lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Glinka put 62% of his first serves in, winning 78% (31/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. Daniil broke Bojarski 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
The Estonian’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Trento,M15 Poitiers,M25 Trimbach and M25 Kachreti.
Glinka has an aggregate 24-23 win-loss record in 2024, 9-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Miletich | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 19 |
| Pts | 80-67 | 63-53 |
| Total Points | 147 | 116 |
| Winners | 29 | 31 |
| %Winners | 36% | 49% |
Both Miletich and Glinka played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Miletich and Glinka have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Miletich played 6 games more than Glinka. Iannis scored 29 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Estonian managed to score 31 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Miletich | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 5 |
| 1st in | 37/68 | 40/65 |
| %1st in | 54% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 29/37 | 31/40 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 23/31 | 12/25 |
| %2nd pts | 74% | 48% |
Miletich recorded 6 aces . Glinka scored 5 aces . Miletich won 78% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 74% of the points. On the other side, Glinka won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Miletich | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 50% | 60% |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Miletich broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Iannis dropped his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Glinka broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Glinka conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Miletich | |||
| Q1 Statham | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-67 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 80-67 | 80-67 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 37/68 | 37/68 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 29/37 | 29/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/31 | 23/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Glinka | |||
| Q1 Bojarski | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 63-53 | 63-53 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 40/65 | 40/65 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 31/40 | 31/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 12/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Laurent LokoliLokoli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GautierGautier – Vadym UrsuUrsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristjan TammTamm – Norbert GombosGombos (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Edison AmbarzumjanAmbarzumjan – Aleksandre BakshiBakshi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniil GlinkaGlinka – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar WeightmanWeightman – Daniel CukiermanCukierman (0-0) – H2H and prediction