Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Jacob Fearnley will fight against each other in the final of the Lincoln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 2:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jacob Fearnley who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jacob Fearnley is the pick to win this match.
Jacob Fearnley -> 1.55
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.35
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Jacob Fearnley
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Jacob Fearnley since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
21 - 22win/loss
161
128
WWLLWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-34 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 171, Chak reached the final after beating Ethan Quinn 6-1 6-3, Jack Pinnington Jones 1-6 6-2 6-4, Li Tu 7-5 6-1 and Nishesh Basavareddy 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-0.
In the semifinal against Basavareddy, Chak recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 7-63 6-0). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 112 points vs Basavareddy’s 96. Chak was pretty aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong overpowered his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was very efficient on serve to win 72% (49/68) of his 1st serve and 51% (19/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Lam Coleman Wong was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Basavareddy 6 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The has lost 2 set in this event to win 55% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (112-85). 21-14 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has an aggregate91-60 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
The’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
Chak has a compiled 21-21 win-loss record in 2024, 21-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lincoln Challenger
Chak has never competed in this tournament before.
Jacob Fearnley
27 - 4win/loss
89
89
LWWLWWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-9 | 10-2 | 0-0 | 26-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 206 (career-high), Fearnley reached the final after defeating Gijs Brouwer 6-1 6-1, Christopher Eubanks 7-5 4-6 6-2, Aidan Mayo 5-7 6-4 6-3 and Bu Yunchaokete 0-6 6-0 7-6(3).
In the semifinal against Yunchaokete, Fearnley recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (0-6 6-0 7-63).During the match Fearnley scored less points (2) than Yunchaokete. In fact, the world no. 171 won 74 points vs Yunchaokete’s. That means that Fearnley was more focused during the important points. Fearnley was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Fearnley blasted 3 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Jacob Fearnley lost the serve 5 times. Furthermore, Fearnley put 62% of his first serves in, winning 68% (27/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (10/25) on the 2nd serve. Jacob broke Yunchaokete 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jacob has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Nottingham 2 Challenger where he overcame Charles Broom in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3.
The Brit has a compiled 26-4 win-loss record in 2024, 9-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 10 | 11 |
| Tot Games | 92 | 100 |
| Pts | 331-276 | 332-294 |
| Total Points | 607 | 626 |
| Winners | 140 | 126 |
| %Winners | 42% | 38% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Fearnley played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 2 sets, while Jacob Fearnley surrendered 3 sets. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set(s) less than Fearnley (10 vs 11). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 8 games less than Fearnley. The scored 140 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Jacob struck 126 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 36 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 3.5 |
| 1st in | 204/310 | 175/291 |
| %1st in | 66% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 140/204 | 126/175 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 55/106 | 56/116 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 48% |
Lam Coleman Wong managed to score 36 aces (9 per match). Fearnley blasted 14 aces (3.5 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 69% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Fearnley won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 19 | 21 |
| Converted | 19/29 | 21/39 |
| % Converted | 66% | 54% |
| Conceded | 27 | 24 |
| Saved | 18 | 11 |
| % Saved | 67% | 46% |
| Times Broken | 9 | 13 |
Chak broke his opponents 19 times with a 66% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Fearnley broke his opponents 21 times with a 54% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 13 times and he saved 46% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||||
| R1 Quinn |
R2 Pinnington Jones |
1/4 Tu |
1/2 Basavareddy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | 7-5 6-1 | 6-75 7-63 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 25 | 19 | 32 | 92 | |
| pts | 70-55 | 78-75 | 71-50 | 112-96 | 331-276 | |
| Total points | 125 | 153 | 121 | 208 | 607 | |
| Winners | 28 | 32 | 31 | 49 | 140 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% | 44% | 44% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 10 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 36 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 40/58 | 49/75 | 47/72 | 68/105 | 204/310 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 65% | 65% | 65% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 32/49 | 31/47 | 49/68 | 140/204 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 65% | 66% | 72% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/26 | 16/25 | 19/37 | 55/106 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 38% | 64% | 51% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 19 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 5/5 | 4/7 | 6/6 | 19/29 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 100% | 57% | 100% | 66% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 | 4 | 11 | 27 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 3/8 | 3/4 | 8/11 | 18 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 38% | 75% | 73% | 72% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 9 | |
| Fearnley | ||||||
| R1 Brouwer |
R2 Eubanks |
1/4 Mayo |
1/2 Yunchaokete |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | 0-6 6-0 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 30 | 31 | 25 | 100 | |
| pts | 56-28 | 101-92 | 101-98 | 74-76 | 332-294 | |
| Total points | 84 | 193 | 199 | 150 | 626 | |
| Winners | 20 | 41 | 38 | 27 | 126 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 41% | 38% | 36% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 22 | |
| 1st in | 22/34 | 58/100 | 55/92 | 40/65 | 175/291 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 58% | 60% | 62% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 20/22 | 41/58 | 38/55 | 27/40 | 126/175 | |
| % 1st pts | 91% | 71% | 69% | 68% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 19/42 | 19/37 | 10/25 | 56/116 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 45% | 51% | 40% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 21 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 6/8 | 5/14 | 5/11 | 21/39 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 75% | 36% | 45% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 24 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 8/12 | 3/7 | 0/5 | 11 | |
| Saved % | – | 67% | 43% | 0% | 28% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 13 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLWLWLWW
LWWLWWLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
