Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Jacob Fearnley will fight against each other in the final of the Lincoln Challenger for the 1^st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 2:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jacob Fearnley who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Jacob Fearnley is the pick to win this match.
Jacob Fearnley -> 1.55
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.35

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Jacob Fearnley

There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Jacob Fearnley since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Ranked no. 171, Chak reached the final after beating Ethan Quinn 6-1 6-3, Jack Pinnington Jones 1-6 6-2 6-4, Li Tu 7-5 6-1 and Nishesh Basavareddy 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-0.

In the semifinal against Basavareddy, Chak recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-7⁵ 7-6³ 6-0). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 112 points vs Basavareddy’s 96. Chak was pretty aggressive to blast 49 winners.

Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong overpowered his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was very efficient on serve to win 72% (49/68) of his 1st serve and 51% (19/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Lam Coleman Wong was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Basavareddy 6 times.

Overall Performance in this tournament

The has lost 2 set in this event to win 55% of the points he played.

Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (112-85). 21-14 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has an aggregate91-60 match record in the last 6 years on hard.

The’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger.

Chak has a compiled 21-21 win-loss record in 2024, 21-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Lincoln Challenger

Chak has never competed in this tournament before.

Jacob Fearnley

Ranked no. 206 (career-high), Fearnley reached the final after defeating Gijs Brouwer 6-1 6-1

, Christopher Eubanks 7-5 4-6 6-2, Aidan Mayo 5-7 6-4 6-3 and Bu Yunchaokete 0-6 6-0 7-6(3).

In the semifinal against Yunchaokete, Fearnley recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (0-6 6-0 7-6³).During the match Fearnley scored less points (2) than Yunchaokete. In fact, the world no. 171 won 74 points vs Yunchaokete’s. That means that Fearnley was more focused during the important points. Fearnley was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.

Talking about serving, Fearnley blasted 3 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Jacob Fearnley lost the serve 5 times. Furthermore, Fearnley put 62% of his first serves in, winning 68% (27/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (10/25) on the 2nd serve. Jacob broke Yunchaokete 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Jacob has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.

His best result of the current year was winning the title the Nottingham 2 Challenger where he overcame Charles Broom in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3.

The Brit has a compiled 26-4 win-loss record in 2024, 9-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

Matches, sets, games and points

Points	Lam Coleman Wong	Fearnley
Match played	4	4
Tot Set	10	11
Tot Games	92	100
Pts	331-276	332-294
Total Points	607	626
Winners	140	126
%Winners	42%	38%

Both Lam Coleman Wong and Fearnley played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 2 sets, while Jacob Fearnley surrendered 3 sets. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set(s) less than Fearnley (10 vs 11). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 8 games less than Fearnley. The scored 140 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Jacob struck 126 winners (38%).

Serve Performance

Serve	Lam Coleman Wong	Fearnley
Aces	36	14
Avg per match	9	3.5
1st in	204/310	175/291
%1st in	66%	60%
1st pts	140/204	126/175
%1st pts	69%	72%
2nd pts	55/106	56/116
%2nd pts	52%	48%

Lam Coleman Wong managed to score 36 aces (9 per match). Fearnley blasted 14 aces (3.5 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 69% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Fearnley won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks	Lam Coleman Wong	Fearnley
Won	19	21
Converted	19/29	21/39
% Converted	66%	54%
Conceded	27	24
Saved	18	11
% Saved	67%	46%
Times Broken	9	13

Chak broke his opponents 19 times with a 66% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Fearnley broke his opponents 21 times with a 54% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 13 times and he saved 46% of the break points that he conceded.

Lam Coleman Wong
	R1 Quinn	R2 Pinnington Jones	1/4 Tu	1/2 Basavareddy	Total
Score	6-1 6-3	1-6 6-2 6-4	7-5 6-1	6-75 7-63 6-0
Tot Set	2	3	2	3	10
Tot Games	16	25	19	32	92
pts	70-55	78-75	71-50	112-96	331-276
Total points	125	153	121	208	607
Winners	28	32	31	49	140
%Winners	40%	41%	44%	44%	42%
SERVE
Aces	10	1	4	21	36
Double Faults	1	3	0	1	5
1st in	40/58	49/75	47/72	68/105	204/310
% 1st in	69%	65%	65%	65%	66%
1st pts	28/40	32/49	31/47	49/68	140/204
% 1st pts	70%	65%	66%	72%	69%
2nd pts	10/18	10/26	16/25	19/37	55/106
% 2nd pts	56%	38%	64%	51%	52%
Breaks
Won	4	5	4	6	19
Converted	4/11	5/5	4/7	6/6	19/29
Converted %	36%	100%	57%	100%	66%
Conceded	4	8	4	11	27
Saved	4/4	3/8	3/4	8/11	18
Saved %	100%	38%	75%	73%	72%
Times Broken	0	5	1	3	9

Fearnley
	R1 Brouwer	R2 Eubanks	1/4 Mayo	1/2 Yunchaokete	Total
Score	6-1 6-1	7-5 4-6 6-2	5-7 6-4 6-3	0-6 6-0 7-63
Tot Set	2	3	3	3	11
Tot Games	14	30	31	25	100
pts	56-28	101-92	101-98	74-76	332-294
Total points	84	193	199	150	626
Winners	20	41	38	27	126
%Winners	36%	41%	38%	36%	38%
SERVE
Aces	7	2	2	3	14
Double Faults	2	6	7	7	22
1st in	22/34	58/100	55/92	40/65	175/291
% 1st in	65%	58%	60%	62%	60%
1st pts	20/22	41/58	38/55	27/40	126/175
% 1st pts	91%	71%	69%	68%	72%
2nd pts	8/12	19/42	19/37	10/25	56/116
% 2nd pts	67%	45%	51%	40%	48%
Breaks
Won	5	6	5	5	21
Converted	5/6	6/8	5/14	5/11	21/39
Converted %	83%	75%	36%	45%	54%
Conceded	0	12	7	5	24
Saved	0/0	8/12	3/7	0/5	11
Saved %	–	67%	43%	0%	28%
Times Broken	0	4	4	5	13

Upcoming matches in the draw

• Jacob FearnleyFearnley – (0-0) – H2H and prediction