Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Nishesh Basavareddy will face off in the semifinal of the Lincoln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nishesh Basavareddy who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nishesh Basavareddy is the pick to win this match.
Nishesh Basavareddy -> 1.87
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Nishesh Basavareddy
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Nishesh Basavareddy since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
21 - 21win/loss
170
128
LWLWWLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 171, the got to the semifinal after beating Ethan Quinn 6-1 6-3, Jack Pinnington Jones 1-6 6-2 6-4 and Li Tu 7-5 6-1.
In the quarter, Lam Coleman Wong had a good straight sets win against Tu (7-5 6-1). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 71 points vs Tu’s 50. The was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong fired 4 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 65% of his first serves in, winning 66% (31/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (16/25) on the 2nd serve. Lam Coleman Wong broke Tu 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (111-85). 20-14 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed90-60 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Chak’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
Lam Coleman Wong has an aggregate 20-21 win-loss record in 2024, 20-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lincoln Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong has never competed in this tournament before.
Nishesh Basavareddy
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 49-18 | 34-11 | 0-0 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-6 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 295 (career-high), the American got to the semifinal after defeating Stefan Kozlov 2-6 6-4 6-2, Cooper Williams 6-3 6-0 and Paul Jubb 7-5 6-3.
In the quarter, The American had a good straight sets win against Jubb (7-5 6-3). During the match Basavareddy scored 84 points vs Jubb’s 62. Basavareddy was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Basavareddy bagged 4 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Nishesh Basavareddy lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Basavareddy put 52% of his first serves in, winning 78% (29/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (17/34) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Jubb 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Basavareddy has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Basavareddy’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Calabasas and the Bloomfield Hills Challenger.
Basavareddy has a compiled 17-7 win-loss record in 2024, 17-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Basavareddy |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 60 | 62 |
| Pts | 219-180 | 224-178 |
| Total Points | 399 | 402 |
| Winners | 91 | 71 |
| %Winners | 42% | 32% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Basavareddy played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 1 set, while Nishesh Basavareddy dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Basavareddy have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 2 games less than Basavareddy. The scored 91 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 71 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Basavareddy |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3.3 |
| 1st in | 136/205 | 97/184 |
| %1st in | 66% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 91/136 | 71/97 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 36/69 | 45/87 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 52% |
Lam Coleman Wong scored 15 aces (5 per match). Basavareddy bagged 10 aces (3.3 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 67% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Basavareddy won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Basavareddy |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 13 | 14 |
| Converted | 13/23 | 14/32 |
| % Converted | 57% | 44% |
| Conceded | 16 | 12 |
| Saved | 10 | 5 |
| % Saved | 63% | 42% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 7 |
Chak broke his opponents 13 times with a 57% conversion rate. Chak lost his serve 6 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Nishesh broke his opponents 14 times with a 44% conversion rate. Nishesh conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 42% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||||
| R1 Quinn |
R2 Pinnington Jones |
1/4 Tu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 25 | 19 | 60 | |
| pts | 70-55 | 78-75 | 71-50 | 219-180 | |
| Total points | 125 | 153 | 121 | 399 | |
| Winners | 28 | 32 | 31 | 91 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% | 44% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 10 | 1 | 4 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/58 | 49/75 | 47/72 | 136/205 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 65% | 65% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 32/49 | 31/47 | 91/136 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 65% | 66% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/26 | 16/25 | 36/69 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 38% | 64% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 5/5 | 4/7 | 13/23 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 100% | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 | 4 | 16 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 3/8 | 3/4 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 38% | 75% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
| Basavareddy | |||||
| R1 Kozlov |
R2 Williams |
1/4 Jubb |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 6-0 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 15 | 21 | 62 | |
| pts | 74-70 | 66-46 | 84-62 | 224-178 | |
| Total points | 144 | 112 | 146 | 402 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | 29 | 71 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 32% | 35% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 5 | 4 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 7 | 15 | |
| 1st in | 32/64 | 28/49 | 37/71 | 97/184 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 57% | 52% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 21/32 | 21/28 | 29/37 | 71/97 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 75% | 78% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 10/21 | 17/34 | 45/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 48% | 50% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/9 | 4/11 | 14/32 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 56% | 36% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 | 3 | 12 | |
| Saved | 1/5 | 3/4 | 1/3 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 20% | 75% | 33% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWLW
LWLWWWWWLW Tennis Scores in Lincoln Challenger
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Aidan MayoMayo (5-7 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Li TuTu (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Paul JubbJubb (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Robert Cash/James TracyCash/James Tracy – George Goldhoff/Christian HarrisonGoldhoff/Christian Harrison (4-6 6-4 13-11) – See score progression
- Anirudh Chandrasekar/Niki Kaliyanda PoonachaChandrasekar/Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha – Alex Lawson/Ethan QuinnLawson/Ethan Quinn (6-2 6-74 10-7) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (1-0) – H2H and prediction
