Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Li Tu will face off in the quarter of the Lincoln Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 3:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Li Tu who should win in 3 sets.
Li Tu -> 1.6
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Li Tu
This will be the 2nd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Li Tu square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Tu (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Tu won 6-2 6-3 in the semifinal in the Lexington Challenger back in August 2024.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
19 - 21win/loss
171
166
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-21 | 19-14 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 171, Lam Coleman Wong reached the quarter after defeating Ethan Quinn 6-1 6-3 and Jack Pinnington Jones 1-6 6-2 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Pinnington Jones, Lam Coleman Wong recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-2 6-4). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 78 points vs Pinnington Jones’s 75. Lam Coleman Wong was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 65% of his first serves in, winning 65% (32/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (10/26) on the 2nd serve. The was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Pinnington Jones 5 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lam Coleman Wong has conceded 1 set in this competition to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (110-85). 19-14 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled89-60 record in the last 6 years on hard.
The’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
The has an aggregate 19-21 win-loss record in 2024, 19-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lincoln Challenger
Chak has never competed in this tournament before.
Li Tu
25 - 18win/loss
190
186
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-18 | 20-12 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-32 | 29-19 | 0-3 | 3-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-25 | 34-16 | 15-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-7 | 28-4 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 190, the Australian got to the quarter after defeating Ryuki Matsuda 6-2 6-4 and Ozan Baris 6-3 5-7 6-3.
In the 2nd
round, The Australian defeated Baris (6-3 5-7 6-3). During the match Tu scored 108 points vs Baris’s 97. Tu was quite aggressive to blast 45 winners.Talking about serving, Tu blasted 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Li Tu lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Tu put 61% of his first serves in, winning 74% (45/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (17/39) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Baris 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Tu’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Traralgon and the Lexington Challenger.
Tu has an overall 25-18 win-loss record in 2024, 20-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 41 | 48 |
| Pts | 148-130 | 172-142 |
| Total Points | 278 | 314 |
| Winners | 60 | 71 |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Tu played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded 1 set, while Li Tu dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Tu have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 7 games less than Tu. Lam Coleman Wong scored 60 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Li made 71 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 89/133 | 91/147 |
| %1st in | 67% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 60/89 | 71/91 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 20/44 | 29/56 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 52% |
Lam Coleman Wong recorded 11 aces (5.5 per match). Tu scored 14 aces (7 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 67% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Tu won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 8 |
| Converted | 9/16 | 8/22 |
| % Converted | 56% | 36% |
| Conceded | 12 | 9 |
| Saved | 7 | 6 |
| % Saved | 58% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
The broke his opponents 9 times with a 56% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. Tu broke his opponents 8 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||
| R1 Quinn | R2 Pinnington Jones | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 25 | 41 | |
| pts | 70-55 | 78-75 | 148-130 | |
| Total points | 125 | 153 | 278 | |
| Winners | 28 | 32 | 60 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 10 | 1 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 40/58 | 49/75 | 89/133 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 65% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 32/49 | 60/89 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 65% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/26 | 20/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 38% | 45% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 5/5 | 9/16 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 100% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 | 12 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 3/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 38% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Tu | ||||
| R1 Matsuda | R2 Baris | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 30 | 48 | |
| pts | 64-45 | 108-97 | 172-142 | |
| Total points | 109 | 205 | 314 | |
| Winners | 26 | 45 | 71 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 42% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 5 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 30/47 | 61/100 | 91/147 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 61% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 26/30 | 45/61 | 71/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 74% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/17 | 17/39 | 29/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 44% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 5/12 | 8/22 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 42% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | 67% | 34% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – (0-0) – H2H and prediction