Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Jack Pinnington Jones will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Lincoln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:00 pm on COURT 11. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Pinnington Jones who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Pinnington Jones is the pick to win this match.
Jack Pinnington Jones -> 1.615
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Jack Pinnington Jones
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Jack Pinnington Jones since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
19 - 21win/loss
161
128
WWLLWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-34 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 171, the reached the 2nd round after beating Ethan Quinn 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round, The had a good straight sets win against Quinn (6-1 6-3). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 70 points vs Quinn’s 55. Lam Coleman Wong was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong made 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 69% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the 2nd serve. The broke Quinn 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (109-85). 18-14 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled88-60 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
Chak has an overall 18-21 win-loss record in 2024, 18-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lincoln Challenger
Chak has never competed in this tournament before.
Jack Pinnington Jones
15 - 6win/loss
377
377
LWWLLWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-12 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 9-7 | 8-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-13 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 533, Pinnington Jones got to the 2nd round after defeating Nikolay Sysoev 7-6(2) 6-2, Naoki Nakagawa 6-2 1-6 6-1 and Emilio Nava 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Nava (6-4 6-2). During the match Pinnington Jones scored 62 points vs Nava’s 48. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Pinnington Jones scored 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jack Pinnington Jones conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Pinnington Jones put 54% of his first serves in, winning 90% (28/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (13/26) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Nava 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Pinnington Jones’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham.
The Brit has a composed 15-5 win-loss record in 2024, 11-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Pinnington Jones |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 61 |
| Pts | 70-55 | 202-166 |
| Total Points | 125 | 368 |
| Winners | 28 | 77 |
| %Winners | 40% | 38% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match while Pinnington Jones competed in 3 matches. Pinnington Jones started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jack Pinnington Jones lost 1 set while Chak Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t lost a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 5 set(s) less than Pinnington Jones (2 vs 7). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 45 games less than Pinnington Jones. The scored 28 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Pinnington Jones scored 77 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Pinnington Jones |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 3 |
| 1st in | 40/58 | 106/193 |
| %1st in | 69% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 77/106 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 49/87 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 56% |
Lam Coleman Wong bagged 10 aces . Pinnington Jones scored 9 aces (3 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 70% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Pinnington Jones won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Pinnington Jones |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 12 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 12/23 |
| % Converted | 36% | 52% |
| Conceded | 4 | 15 |
| Saved | 4 | 10 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
The broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Chak pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 4 break points. The Brit broke his opponents 12 times with a 52% conversion rate. Jack conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| R1 Quinn |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 70-55 | 70-55 | |
| Total points | 125 | 125 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 40/58 | 40/58 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 28/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Pinnington Jones | |||||
| Q1 Sysoev |
Q3 Nakagawa |
R1 Nava |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-2 | 6-2 1-6 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 22 | 18 | 61 | |
| pts | 73-60 | 67-58 | 62-48 | 202-166 | |
| Total points | 133 | 125 | 110 | 368 | |
| Winners | 23 | 26 | 28 | 77 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 39% | 45% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 1 | 2 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 3 | 1 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 29/70 | 46/66 | 31/57 | 106/193 | |
| % 1st in | 41% | 70% | 54% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 26/46 | 28/31 | 77/106 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 57% | 90% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/41 | 11/20 | 13/26 | 49/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 55% | 50% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 6 | 3 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 6/9 | 3/6 | 12/23 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 67% | 50% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 8 | 5 | 15 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 4/8 | 5/5 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | 100% | 200% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLWLWLWW
LWWLLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Lincoln Challenger
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Harold MayotMayot (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Paul JubbJubb – Luca Van AsscheVan Assche (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Li TuTu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
