Luca Van Assche and Paul Jubb will face off in the 2nd round of the Lincoln Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 11. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Luca Van Assche who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Luca Van Assche is the pick to win this match.
Luca Van Assche -> 1.5
Paul Jubb -> 2.47
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Luca Van Assche vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Luca Van Assche and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Luca Van Assche
23 - 25win/loss
128
63
LWLWLLLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-38 | 15-15 | 8-10 | 10-11 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-30 | 1-7 | 15-11 | 15-9 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 55-31 | 0-1 | 40-20 | 15-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-22 | 3-2 | 8-7 | 15-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 111, the French player got to the 2nd round after beating Christian Langmo 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round, Luca had a good straight sets win against Langmo (6-1 6-3). During the match, Van Assche scored 66 points vs Langmo’s 41. Van Assche was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van Assche fired 2 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Luca Van Assche lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Van Assche put 73% of his first serves in, winning 68% (27/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the 2nd serve. Van Assche broke Langmo 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Van Assche has a winning match record in the last 5 years having won 57% of his matches (145-111). 12-10 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Van Assche has a compiled16-20 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Van Assche’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Phoenix Challenger and the Heilbronn Challenger.
Luca has a composed 23-24 win-loss record in 2024, 12-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lincoln Challenger
Luca has never competed in this tournament before.
Paul Jubb
42 - 20win/loss
181
180
LLWLWWLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 196 (career-high), the Brit got to the 2nd round after beating Joan Torres Espinosa 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Jubb had a good straight sets win against Torres Espinosa (6-1 6-4). During the match Jubb scored 61 points vs Torres Espinosa’s 44. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Jubb scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 69% of his first serves in, winning 71% (29/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (6/18) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Torres Espinosa 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Jubb’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Glasgow Challenger and M25 Nottingham.
Paul has an aggregate 41-20 win-loss record in 2024, 23-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van Assche | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 |
| Pts | 66-41 | 61-44 |
| Total Points | 107 | 105 |
| Winners | 27 | 29 |
| %Winners | 41% | 48% |
Both Van Assche and Jubb played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van Assche and Jubb have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Van Assche played 1 game less than Jubb. Van Assche scored 27 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Jubb managed to score 29 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van Assche | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
| 1st in | 40/55 | 41/59 |
| %1st in | 73% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 29/41 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 6/18 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 33% |
Van Assche bagged 2 aces . Jubb recorded 1 ace . Van Assche won 68% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 33% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van Assche | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/7 |
| % Converted | 45% | 71% |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 |
| Saved | 2 | 5 |
| % Saved | 67% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Luca broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. The French player dropped his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van Assche | |||
| R1 Langmo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 66-41 | 66-41 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 40/55 | 40/55 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 27/40 | 27/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 10/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Jubb | |||
| R1 Torres |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 61-44 | 61-44 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 41/59 | 41/59 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 29/41 | 29/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/18 | 6/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLLLWW
LLWLWWLWLL Tennis Scores in Lincoln Challenger
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Stefan KozlovKozlov (2-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Borna GojoGojo (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Ozan BarisBaris – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Joshua LapadatLapadat (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Emilio NavaNava (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Tristan BoyerBoyer (7-5 7-60) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Joan Torres EspinosaTorres Espinosa (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Anton SheppShepp (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cooper WilliamsWilliams – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (7-63 7-5) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Colton SmithSmith – Joshua LapadatLapadat (6-0 6-0) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Stefan KozlovKozlov (2-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Luca Van AsscheVan Assche – Christian LangmoLangmo (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ozan BarisBaris – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Li TuTu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
