Christian Langmo and Karl Poling will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Lincoln Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 11. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christian Langmo who should win in 3 sets.
Christian Langmo -> 1.72
Karl Poling -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Christian Langmo vs. Karl Poling
This will be the 2nd time that Christian Langmo and Karl Poling clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Langmo (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Langmo won 6-3 6-1 in the qualifications in USA F18.
Christian Langmo
24 - 20win/loss
471
333
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-20 | 19-14 | 5-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 469, Christian reached the qualifications after beating Alex Kobelt 7-6(2) 7-6(5).
In the qualifications, Christian had a good straight sets win against Kobelt (7-62 7-65). During the match, Langmo scored 88 points vs Kobelt’s 81. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Langmo bagged 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Christian Langmo was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 82% (40/49) of his 1st serve and 62% (21/34) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match.
Langmo has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (204-151). 19-14 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Langmo has a composed170-116 record in the last 8 years on hard.
Langmo has a compiled 24-20 win-loss record in 2024, 19-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lincoln Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Karl Poling
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 7-3 | 7-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 10-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 870, Karl reached the qualifications after defeating Omni Kumar 7-6(13) 6-1.
In the qualifications, Poling had a good straight sets win against Kumar (7-613 6-1). During the match Poling scored 80 points vs Kumar’s 60. Karl was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Poling struck 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Karl Poling was extremely effective on serve to win 85% (33/39) of his 1st serve and 70% (19/27) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Karl broke Kumar twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Karl’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Laval.
Poling has an overall 7-3 win-loss record in 2024, 7-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Langmo | Poling |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 26 | 20 |
Pts | 88-81 | 80-60 |
Total Points | 169 | 140 |
Winners | 40 | 33 |
%Winners | 45% | 41% |
Both Langmo and Poling played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Langmo and Poling have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Langmo played 6 games more than Poling. The American scored 40 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The American fired 33 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Langmo | Poling |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 4 |
Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
1st in | 49/83 | 39/66 |
%1st in | 59% | 59% |
1st pts | 40/49 | 33/39 |
%1st pts | 82% | 85% |
2nd pts | 21/34 | 19/27 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 70% |
Langmo managed to score 8 aces . Poling struck 4 aces . Langmo won 82% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Poling won 85% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 70% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Langmo | Poling |
---|---|---|
Won | 0 | 2 |
Converted | 0/3 | 2/3 |
% Converted | 0% | 67% |
Conceded | 2 | 3 |
Saved | 2 | 3 |
% Saved | 100% | 100% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The American hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Christian very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points without even conceding a single break point. The American broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
Langmo | |||
Q1 Kobelt | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-62 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
pts | 88-81 | 88-81 | |
Total points | 169 | 169 | |
Winners | 40 | 40 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 49/83 | 49/83 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 40/49 | 40/49 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 21/34 | 21/34 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 0 | 0 | |
Converted | 0/3 | 0/3 | |
Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Poling | |||
Q1 Kumar | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-613 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 80-60 | 80-60 | |
Total points | 140 | 140 | |
Winners | 33 | 33 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 39/66 | 39/66 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 33/39 | 33/39 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 19/27 | 19/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Karl PolingPoling – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (1-0) – H2H and prediction