Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Li Tu will play each other in the semifinal of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 2:00 pm on STADIUM 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Li Tu who should win in 3 sets.
Li Tu -> 1.87
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Li Tu
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Li Tu since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
17 - 21win/loss
159
128
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-34 | 36-24 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 179, the got to the semifinal after defeating Matias Soto 6-4 3-6 6-3, Andres Andrade 4-6 6-1 6-2 and Micah Braswell 6-4 7-6(3).
In the quarter, Lam Coleman Wong had a good straight sets win against Braswell (6-4 7-63). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 75 points vs Braswell’s 59. Chak was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong struck 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (37/46) of his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Lam Coleman Wong broke Braswell twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The has conceded 2 set in this event to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (108-84). 17-13 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled87-59 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
Lam Coleman Wong’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
Lam Coleman Wong has an overall 17-20 win-loss record in 2024, 17-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Chak has never competed in this tournament before.
Li Tu
23 - 17win/loss
178
178
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-25 | 31-19 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-32 | 29-19 | 0-3 | 3-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 50-25 | 34-16 | 15-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-7 | 28-4 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 222, the Australian reached the semifinal after defeating Taha Baadi 1-6 6-2 6-4, James Kent Trotter 6-4 6-4 and Emilio Nava 7-6(5) 6-3.
In the quarter, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Nava (7-65 6-3). During the match Tu scored 67 points vs Nava’s 54. Li was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Tu struck 11 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Li Tu was quite effective on serve to win 86% (31/36) of his 1st serve and 83% (19/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Li broke Nava once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Tu has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
The Australian’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Traralgon.
Tu has an aggregate 22-17 win-loss record in 2024, 17-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 76 | 67 |
| Pts | 249-202 | 204-175 |
| Total Points | 451 | 379 |
| Winners | 118 | 95 |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Tu played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost 2 sets, while Li Tu surrendered 1 set. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set more than Tu (8 vs 7). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 9 games more than Tu. Chak scored 118 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Li scored 95 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 28 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 9.3 | 7.3 |
| 1st in | 145/232 | 122/192 |
| %1st in | 63% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 118/145 | 95/122 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 46/87 | 44/70 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 63% |
Lam Coleman Wong recorded 28 aces (9.3 per match). Tu fired 22 aces (7.3 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 81% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Tu won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Tu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 7 |
| Converted | 9/14 | 7/17 |
| % Converted | 64% | 41% |
| Conceded | 14 | 9 |
| Saved | 11 | 5 |
| % Saved | 79% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
The broke his opponents 9 times with a 64% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong lost his serve 3 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded. Li broke his opponents 7 times with a 41% conversion rate. Li conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||||
| R1 Soto | R2 Andrade | 1/4 Braswell | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 25 | 23 | 76 | |
| pts | 76-69 | 98-74 | 75-59 | 249-202 | |
| Total points | 145 | 172 | 134 | 451 | |
| Winners | 43 | 38 | 37 | 118 | |
| %Winners | 57% | 39% | 49% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 16 | 4 | 8 | 28 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 51/74 | 48/94 | 46/64 | 145/232 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 51% | 72% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 43/51 | 38/48 | 37/46 | 118/145 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 79% | 80% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 22/46 | 12/18 | 46/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 48% | 67% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 5 | 2 | 9 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 5/7 | 2/4 | 9/14 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 71% | 50% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 12 | 1 | 14 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 11/12 | 0/1 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 92% | 0% | 31% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| Tu | |||||
| R1 Baadi | R2 Kent | 1/4 Nava | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 20 | 22 | 67 | |
| pts | 75-74 | 62-47 | 67-54 | 204-175 | |
| Total points | 149 | 109 | 121 | 379 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | 31 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 52% | 46% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 5 | 11 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 47/81 | 39/52 | 36/59 | 122/192 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 75% | 61% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 32/47 | 32/39 | 31/36 | 95/122 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 82% | 86% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/34 | 7/13 | 19/23 | 44/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 54% | 83% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/8 | 1/2 | 7/17 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 38% | 50% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 | 0 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 67% | – | 39% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Lexington Challenger
- Trey Hilderbrand/Alex LawsonHilderbrand/Alex Lawson – Hans Hach Verdugo/Niki Kaliyanda PoonachaHach Verdugo/Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha (6-4 6-76 10-8) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Micah BraswellBraswell (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Emilio NavaNava (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (1-0) – H2H and prediction