Botic Van De Zandschulp and Raphael Collignon will play each other in the final of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 3:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.61
Raphael Collignon -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Raphael Collignon
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Raphael Collignon since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
22 - 22win/loss
80
22
WLLWWWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-32 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 6-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 84, Van De Zandschulp reached the final after beating Rudolf Molleker 6-3 6-4, Gerard Campana Lee 6-1 3-6 6-4, Henri Squire 3-6 7-5 7-5 and Titouan Droguet 3-1 ret..
In the semifinal against Droguet, Botic had a free pass after Droguet retired on a 3-1 . scoreline.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (335-196). 16-11 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van De Zandschulp has a compiled 160-93 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Dutch’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Braunschweig Challenger.
Botic has a compiled 22-22 win-loss record in 2024, 16-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
The Dutch has never competed in this tournament before.
Raphael Collignon
48 - 13win/loss
122
122
LWWWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 72-23 | 5-3 | 46-8 | 21-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-16 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 61-22 | 14-4 | 38-12 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-20 | 11-11 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-6 | 6-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 306, the Belgian reached the final after defeating Diego Dedura-Palomero 6-4 6-4, Marco Trungelliti 6-4 6-4, Clement Tabur 6-4 4-6 6-4 and Kamil Majchrzak 6-1 6-3.
In the semifinal, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Majchrzak (6-1 6-3). During the match Collignon scored 57 points vs Majchrzak’s 38. The Belgian was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Collignon blasted 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Raphael Collignon conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Collignon put 58% of his first serves in, winning 89% (25/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. The Belgian broke Majchrzak 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Raphael has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Collignon’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Hammamet,M25 Angers,M25 Deauville,M25 Marburg and M25 Kassel.
Raphael has an aggregate 48-13 win-loss record in 2024, 34-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Collignon |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 10 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 82 | 86 |
| Pts | 277-242 | 312-271 |
| Total Points | 519 | 583 |
| Winners | 111 | 111 |
| %Winners | 40% | 36% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Collignon played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Botic Van De Zandschulp conceded 2 sets, while Raphael Collignon conceded 1 set. Van De Zandschulp has played 1 set more than Collignon (10 vs 9). However, it’s interesting to notice that Van De Zandschulp played 4 games less than Collignon. Van De Zandschulp scored 111 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Collignon struck 111 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Collignon |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 22 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 5.5 | 6.8 |
| 1st in | 152/255 | 150/275 |
| %1st in | 60% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 111/152 | 111/150 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 46/103 | 65/125 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 52% |
Van De Zandschulp blasted 22 aces (5.5 per match). Collignon fired 27 aces (6.8 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 73% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Collignon won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Collignon |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 15 | 16 |
| Converted | 15/31 | 16/44 |
| % Converted | 48% | 36% |
| Conceded | 21 | 29 |
| Saved | 12 | 22 |
| % Saved | 57% | 76% |
| Times Broken | 9 | 7 |
Botic broke his opponents 15 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Dutch dropped his serve 9 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. The Belgian broke his opponents 16 times with a 36% conversion rate. Raphael conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||||
| R1 Molleker |
R2 Campana Lee |
1/4 Squire |
1/2 Droguet |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 3-6 6-4 | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | 3-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 26 | 33 | 4 | 82 | |
| pts | 74-62 | 89-79 | 100-93 | 14-8 | 277-242 | |
| Total points | 136 | 168 | 193 | 22 | 519 | |
| Winners | 32 | 27 | 46 | 6 | 111 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 30% | 46% | 43% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 8 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 19 | |
| 1st in | 38/69 | 40/79 | 67/97 | 7/10 | 152/255 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 51% | 69% | 70% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 32/38 | 27/40 | 46/67 | 6/7 | 111/152 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 68% | 69% | 86% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 16/39 | 14/30 | 2/3 | 46/103 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 41% | 47% | 67% | 45% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 15 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 7/15 | 4/8 | 1/2 | 15/31 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 47% | 50% | 50% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 21 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 3/8 | 4/8 | 0/0 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 38% | 50% | – | 47% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 9 | |
| Collignon | ||||||
| R1 Dedura-Palomero |
R2 Trungelliti |
1/4 Tabur |
1/2 Majchrzak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | 30 | 16 | 86 | |
| pts | 76-64 | 73-66 | 106-103 | 57-38 | 312-271 | |
| Total points | 140 | 139 | 209 | 95 | 583 | |
| Winners | 28 | 26 | 32 | 25 | 111 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 36% | 30% | 44% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 8 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 19 | |
| 1st in | 33/62 | 38/63 | 51/102 | 28/48 | 150/275 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 60% | 50% | 58% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 26/38 | 32/51 | 25/28 | 111/150 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 68% | 63% | 89% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 15/25 | 24/51 | 10/20 | 65/125 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 60% | 47% | 50% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 16 | |
| Converted | 2/11 | 3/10 | 7/15 | 4/8 | 16/44 | |
| Converted % | 18% | 30% | 47% | 50% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | 18 | 1 | 29 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 4/5 | 12/18 | 1/1 | 22 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 80% | 67% | 100% | 87% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWWWLLWL
LWWWWWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
