Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Micah Braswell will clash against each other in the quarter of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 12:30 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.8
Micah Braswell -> 1.94

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Micah Braswell

There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Micah Braswell since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

17 - 20win/loss

Hard
17-13
I Hard
0-1
Clay
0-2
Grass
0-4
Rank
170
High
128
LWLWWLLWLW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 41-36 39-26 0-2 2-4 0-4 0-0
2023 53-27 42-19 9-7 2-1 0-0 0-0
2022 24-19 20-12 3-5 1-2 0-0 0-0
2021 11-7 5-4 6-3 0-0 0-0 0-0
2020 2-4 2-4 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 179, Chak reached the quarter after beating Matias Soto 6-4 3-6 6-3 and Andres Andrade 4-6 6-1 6-2.

In the 2nd round against Andrade, Chak recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-1 6-2). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 98 points vs Andrade’s 74. Chak was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.

Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong scored 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve once and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 51% of his first serves in, winning 79% (38/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (22/46) on the 2nd serve. Chak broke Andrade 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Lam Coleman Wong has surrendered 2 set in this tournament to win 55% of the points he played.

Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (107-84). 16-13 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled86-59 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.

The’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger.

The has an overall 16-20 win-loss record in 2024, 16-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Lexington Challenger

Lam Coleman Wong has never competed in this tournament before.

Lexington Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong's Record

Micah Braswell

Micah Braswell

15 - 5win/loss

Hard
12-4
I Hard
3-1
Rank
461
High
456
LWWWWLWWWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 29-14 17-8 0-0 12-6 0-0 0-0
2023 7-6 5-5 0-0 2-1 0-0 0-0
2022 6-2 6-2 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0
2021 1-3 1-3 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0
2020 2-3 2-1 0-2 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 736, Braswell got to the quarter after defeating Christian Langmo 7-5 6-0, Yuta Shimizu 7-6(0) 6-4, Bruno Kuzuhara 7-6(4) 6-3 and Bernard Tomic w/o.

In the 2nd round, Braswell defeated Tomic (w/o). During the match Braswell and Tomic scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 179 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The American was not very aggressive do strike just winners.

About the serving games, Braswell couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Micah Braswell conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.

Overall Performance in this tournament

Braswell started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this tournament to win 55% of the points he played.

Braswell’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Wichita.

Micah has an overall 15-4 win-loss record in 2024, 12-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Lexington Challenger
Braswell's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

C.Lam Wong
M.Braswell
3h:55
3h:55
Time on court​
4h:46
4h:46
!
2h:16
2h:16
Last match​
1h:36
1h:36
2
2
Match played
!
3
3
53
53
Games Played​
63
63
6
6
Set played​​
6
6
174
174
Total points​
205
205
87
87
Avg point​
68.3
68.3
81
81
Winners
98
98
40.5
40.5
Avg Winners​
32.7
32.7
47%
47%
Ratio winners
48%
48%
-- Serve --
20
20
Aces
11
11
10
10
Avg Aces
3.7
3.7
4
4
Double Faults
6
6
2
2
Avg Double Faults
2
2
81/99
81/99
1st won total​
98/131
98/131
!
82%
82%
1st won %
!
75%
75%
34/69
34/69
2nd won total​
34/67
34/67
49%
49%
2nd won %
51%
51%
-- Break Points --
7/10
7/10
BP won
10/21
10/21
3.5/5
3.5/5
Avg BP won
3.3/7
3.3/7
!
70%
70%
Won
48%
48%
13
13
Conceded
8
8
6.5
6.5
Avg Conceded
2.7
2.7
2
2
Broken
4
4
1
1
Avg Broken
1.3
1.3
11
11
Saved
4
4

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Lam Coleman Wong Braswell
Match played 2 3
Tot Set 6 6
Tot Games 53 63
Pts 174-143 205-171
Total Points 317 376
Winners 81 98
%Winners 47% 48%

Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches while Braswell competed in 3 matches. Braswell started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded 2 sets while Micah Braswell hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Braswell have played the same amount of sets 6. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 10 games less than Braswell. The scored 81 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 98 winners (48%).

Serve Performance

Serve Lam Coleman Wong Braswell
Aces 20 11
Avg per match 10 3.7
1st in 99/168 131/198
%1st in 59% 66%
1st pts 81/99 98/131
%1st pts 82% 75%
2nd pts 34/69 34/67
%2nd pts 49% 51%

Lam Coleman Wong blasted 20 aces (10 per match). Braswell made 11 aces (3.7 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 82% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Braswell won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Lam Coleman Wong Braswell
Won 7 10
Converted 7/10 10/21
% Converted 70% 48%
Conceded 13 8
Saved 11 4
% Saved 85% 50%
Times Broken 2 4

The broke his opponents 7 times with a 70% conversion rate. The conceded his serve twice and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 10 times with a 48% conversion rate. Braswell conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.

Lam Coleman Wong
R1
Soto
R2
Andrade
Total
Score 6-4 3-6 6-3 4-6 6-1 6-2
Tot Set 3 3 6
Tot Games 28 25 53
pts 76-69 98-74 174-143
Total points 145 172 317
Winners 43 38 81
%Winners 57% 39% 47%
SERVE
Aces 16 4 20
Double Faults 1 3 4
1st in 51/74 48/94 99/168
% 1st in 69% 51% 59%
1st pts 43/51 38/48 81/99
% 1st pts 84% 79% 82%
2nd pts 12/23 22/46 34/69
% 2nd pts 52% 48% 49%
Breaks
Won 2 5 7
Converted 2/3 5/7 7/10
Converted % 67% 71% 70%
Conceded 1 12 13
Saved 0/1 11/12 11
Saved % 0% 92% 46%
Times Broken 1 1 2
Braswell
Q1
Langmo
Q3
Shimizu
R1
Kuzuhara
R2
Tomic
Total
Score 7-5 6-0 7-60 6-4 7-64 6-3 w/o
Tot Set 2 2 2 6
Tot Games 18 23 22 63
pts 63-40 74-70 68-61 205-171
Total points 103 144 129 376
Winners 23 29 46 98
%Winners 37% 39% 68% 48%
SERVE
Aces 3 2 6 11
Double Faults 2 1 3 6
1st in 31/52 44/72 56/74 131/198
% 1st in 60% 61% 76% 66%
1st pts 23/31 29/44 46/56 98/131
% 1st pts 74% 66% 82% 75%
2nd pts 13/21 13/28 8/18 34/67
% 2nd pts 62% 46% 44% 51%
Breaks
Won 5 4 1 10
Converted 5/8 4/11 1/2 10/21
Converted % 63% 36% 50% 48%
Conceded 2 5 1 8
Saved 1/2 2/5 1/1 4
Saved % 50% 40% 100% 95%
Times Broken 1 3 0 4

Upcoming matches in the draw