Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Micah Braswell will clash against each other in the quarter of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 12:30 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.8
Micah Braswell -> 1.94
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Micah Braswell
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Micah Braswell since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
17 - 20win/loss
170
128
LWLWWLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 179, Chak reached the quarter after beating Matias Soto 6-4 3-6 6-3 and Andres Andrade 4-6 6-1 6-2.
In the 2nd round against Andrade, Chak recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-1 6-2). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 98 points vs Andrade’s 74. Chak was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lam Coleman Wong scored 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve once and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 51% of his first serves in, winning 79% (38/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (22/46) on the 2nd serve. Chak broke Andrade 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lam Coleman Wong has surrendered 2 set in this tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (107-84). 16-13 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a compiled86-59 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
The’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
The has an overall 16-20 win-loss record in 2024, 16-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong has never competed in this tournament before.
Micah Braswell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-14 | 17-8 | 0-0 | 12-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 736, Braswell got to the quarter after defeating Christian Langmo 7-5 6-0, Yuta Shimizu 7-6(0) 6-4, Bruno Kuzuhara 7-6(4) 6-3 and Bernard Tomic w/o.
In the 2nd round, Braswell defeated Tomic (w/o). During the match Braswell and Tomic scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 179 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The American was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
About the serving games, Braswell couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Micah Braswell conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Braswell started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Braswell’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Wichita.
Micah has an overall 15-4 win-loss record in 2024, 12-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 53 | 63 |
| Pts | 174-143 | 205-171 |
| Total Points | 317 | 376 |
| Winners | 81 | 98 |
| %Winners | 47% | 48% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches while Braswell competed in 3 matches. Braswell started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded 2 sets while Micah Braswell hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Talking about their workload, Lam Coleman Wong and Braswell have played the same amount of sets 6. However, Lam Coleman Wong played 10 games less than Braswell. The scored 81 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 98 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 99/168 | 131/198 |
| %1st in | 59% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 81/99 | 98/131 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 34/69 | 34/67 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 51% |
Lam Coleman Wong blasted 20 aces (10 per match). Braswell made 11 aces (3.7 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 82% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Braswell won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 10 |
| Converted | 7/10 | 10/21 |
| % Converted | 70% | 48% |
| Conceded | 13 | 8 |
| Saved | 11 | 4 |
| % Saved | 85% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
The broke his opponents 7 times with a 70% conversion rate. The conceded his serve twice and he saved 85% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 10 times with a 48% conversion rate. Braswell conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||
| R1 Soto |
R2 Andrade |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 25 | 53 | |
| pts | 76-69 | 98-74 | 174-143 | |
| Total points | 145 | 172 | 317 | |
| Winners | 43 | 38 | 81 | |
| %Winners | 57% | 39% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 16 | 4 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 51/74 | 48/94 | 99/168 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 51% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 43/51 | 38/48 | 81/99 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 79% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 22/46 | 34/69 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 48% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 5/7 | 7/10 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 71% | 70% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 12 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 11/12 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 92% | 46% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Braswell | ||||||
| Q1 Langmo |
Q3 Shimizu |
R1 Kuzuhara |
R2 Tomic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-0 | 7-60 6-4 | 7-64 6-3 | w/o | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | – | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 23 | 22 | – | 63 | |
| pts | 63-40 | 74-70 | 68-61 | – | 205-171 | |
| Total points | 103 | 144 | 129 | – | 376 | |
| Winners | 23 | 29 | 46 | – | 98 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 39% | 68% | – | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 6 | – | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | – | 6 | |
| 1st in | 31/52 | 44/72 | 56/74 | – | 131/198 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 61% | 76% | – | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 29/44 | 46/56 | – | 98/131 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 66% | 82% | – | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/28 | 8/18 | – | 34/67 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 46% | 44% | – | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 1 | – | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/11 | 1/2 | – | 10/21 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 36% | 50% | – | 48% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 1 | – | 8 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/5 | 1/1 | – | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 40% | 100% | – | 95% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 0 | – | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWLW
LWWWWLWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Li TuTu – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Micah BraswellBraswell – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
