Botic Van De Zandschulp and Titouan Droguet will square off in the semifinal of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 4:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.36
Titouan Droguet -> 2.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Titouan Droguet
This will be the 2nd time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Titouan Droguet play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Droguet (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Droguet won 6-3 7-6(1) in the 1st round in Netherlands F4 (Oldenzaal) back in 2018.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
21 - 22win/loss
80
22
WLLWWWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-32 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 6-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 84, Botic reached the semifinal after beating Rudolf Molleker 6-3 6-4, Gerard Campana Lee 6-1 3-6 6-4 and Henri Squire 3-6 7-5 7-5.
In the quarter against Squire, Van De Zandschulp recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 7-5). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 100 points vs Squire’s 93. Van De Zandschulp was very aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp scored 8 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 69% of his first serves in, winning 69% (46/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (14/30) on the 2nd serve. Botic broke Squire 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Van De Zandschulp has surrendered 2 set in this competition to win 53% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (334-196). 15-11 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has a composed 159-93 record in the last years on clay.
Botic’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Braunschweig Challenger.
Van De Zandschulp has a composed 21-22 win-loss record in 2024, 15-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Van De Zandschulp has never competed in this tournament before.
Titouan Droguet
28 - 16win/loss
184
130
LLLWLLLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-27 | 6-5 | 18-8 | 9-12 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-24 | 4-1 | 27-16 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 57-24 | 14-6 | 41-15 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-16 | 2-1 | 17-9 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 30-11 | 11-2 | 6-3 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 4-0 |
Ranked no. 153, Titouan reached the semifinal after defeating Marlon Vankan 7-6(4) 6-2, Martin Landaluce 7-5 7-6(3) and Oriol Roca Batalla 6-3 6-2.
In the quarter, Droguet had a good straight sets win against Roca Batalla (6-3 6-2). During the match Droguet scored 62 points vs Roca Batalla’s 47. The French player was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Droguet scored 3 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Titouan Droguet was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (26/33) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The French player broke Roca Batalla 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Droguet hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Francavilla Challenger where he beat Jacopo Berrettini in the final 6-3 7-6(4).
Titouan has a composed 28-16 win-loss record in 2024, 18-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Droguet |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 78 | 63 |
| Pts | 263-234 | 237-199 |
| Total Points | 497 | 436 |
| Winners | 105 | 88 |
| %Winners | 40% | 37% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Droguet played 3 matches. At the moment, Botic Van De Zandschulp dropped 2 sets while Titouan Droguet hasn’t conceded a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 2 sets more than Droguet (8 vs 6). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 15 games more than Droguet. Van De Zandschulp scored 105 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The French player struck 88 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Droguet |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 21 | 16 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 5.3 |
| 1st in | 145/245 | 113/198 |
| %1st in | 59% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 105/145 | 88/113 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 44/100 | 50/85 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 59% |
Van De Zandschulp blasted 21 aces (7 per match). Droguet made 16 aces (5.3 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 72% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Droguet won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Droguet |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 8 |
| Converted | 14/29 | 8/26 |
| % Converted | 48% | 31% |
| Conceded | 21 | 9 |
| Saved | 12 | 7 |
| % Saved | 57% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 9 | 2 |
Van De Zandschulp broke his opponents 14 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Dutch dropped his serve 9 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded. Droguet broke his opponents 8 times with a 31% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||||
| R1 Molleker |
R2 Campana Lee |
1/4 Squire |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 3-6 6-4 | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 26 | 33 | 78 | |
| pts | 74-62 | 89-79 | 100-93 | 263-234 | |
| Total points | 136 | 168 | 193 | 497 | |
| Winners | 32 | 27 | 46 | 105 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 30% | 46% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 5 | 8 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 8 | 9 | 19 | |
| 1st in | 38/69 | 40/79 | 67/97 | 145/245 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 51% | 69% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 32/38 | 27/40 | 46/67 | 105/145 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 68% | 69% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 16/39 | 14/30 | 44/100 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 41% | 47% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 7 | 4 | 14 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 7/15 | 4/8 | 14/29 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 47% | 50% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 | 8 | 21 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 3/8 | 4/8 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 38% | 50% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Droguet | |||||
| R1 Vankan |
R2 Landaluce |
1/4 Roca Batalla |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-2 | 7-5 7-63 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 25 | 17 | 63 | |
| pts | 87-72 | 88-80 | 62-47 | 237-199 | |
| Total points | 159 | 168 | 109 | 436 | |
| Winners | 32 | 30 | 26 | 88 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 34% | 42% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 4 | 3 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 39/70 | 41/76 | 33/52 | 113/198 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 54% | 63% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 30/41 | 26/33 | 88/113 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 73% | 79% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 21/35 | 12/19 | 50/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 60% | 63% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 3/8 | 3/8 | 8/26 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 38% | 38% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 0 | 9 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 60% | – | 53% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWWWLLWL
LLLWLLLLWW Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Clement TaburTabur (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Henri SquireSquire (3-6 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Henri SquireSquire (3-6 7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Clement TaburTabur (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
