Elmer Moller and Andrew Paulson will clash against each other in the quarter of the Liberec Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 10:30 am on SVIJANY COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elmer Moller who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elmer Moller is the pick to win this match.
Elmer Moller -> 1.63
Andrew Paulson -> 2.19
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elmer Moller vs. Andrew Paulson
There is no head to head record between Elmer Moller and Andrew Paulson since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Elmer Moller
41 - 16win/loss
153
153
LWLWWWWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 62-25 | 5-3 | 52-20 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-21 | 14-11 | 31-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-15 | 10-5 | 12-7 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-9 | 8-4 | 2-4 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 283, Elmer reached the quarter after beating Juan Bautista Torres 6-4 6-1 and Filip Cristian Jianu 6-2 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Elmer had a good straight sets win against Cristian Jianu (6-2 6-1). During the match, Moller scored 59 points vs Cristian Jianu’s 30. Elmer was quite aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about the service games, Moller recorded 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Elmer Moller was extremely effective on serve to win 85% (17/20) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Dane broke Cristian Jianu 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dane hasn’t dropped yet a set in this event to win 61% of the points he played.
Moller has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 67% of his matches (126-61). 32-12 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Moller has an overall77-31 win-loss record in the last 5 years on clay.
The Dane’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula,the Augsburg Challenger and M25 Aarhus.
Moller has a composed 39-16 win-loss record in 2024, 32-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Liberec Challenger
Moller has never competed in this tournament before.
Andrew Paulson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-22 | 1-3 | 31-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 53-27 | 6-3 | 30-15 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2021 | 47-26 | 19-8 | 11-11 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 388, Andrew reached the quarter after beating David Jorda Sanchis 7-5 7-6(4) and Jerome Kym 7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Andrew defeated Kym (7-65 6-76 6-3). During the match Paulson scored 114 points vs Kym’s 102. Paulson was quite aggressive to blast 47 winners.
About the serving games, Paulson scored 16 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Andrew Paulson was extremely efficient on serve to win 81% (47/58) of his 1st serve and 54% (31/57) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Andrew broke Kym 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Czech has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Paulson has a compiled 5-2 win-loss record in 2024, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Liberec Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Moller | Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 60 |
| Pts | 119-77 | 202-183 |
| Total Points | 196 | 385 |
| Winners | 41 | 83 |
| %Winners | 34% | 41% |
Both Moller and Paulson played 2 matches. At the moment, Andrew Paulson surrendered 1 set while Elmer Moller hasn’t conceded a set so far. Moller has played 1 set(s) less than Paulson (4 vs 5). Therefore, Moller played 28 games less than Paulson. The Dane scored 41 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Paulson fired 83 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Moller | Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 19 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 9.5 |
| 1st in | 52/91 | 102/185 |
| %1st in | 57% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 41/52 | 83/102 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 23/39 | 44/83 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 53% |
Moller managed to score 2 aces (1 per match). Paulson bagged 19 aces (9.5 per match). Moller won 79% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Paulson won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Moller | Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 6 |
| Converted | 10/19 | 6/20 |
| % Converted | 53% | 30% |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 83% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Elmer broke his opponents 10 times with a 53% conversion rate. The Dane conceded his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. The Czech broke his opponents 6 times with a 30% conversion rate. Andrew conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Moller | ||||
| R1 Bautista |
R2 Cristian |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 32 | |
| pts | 60-47 | 59-30 | 119-77 | |
| Total points | 107 | 89 | 196 | |
| Winners | 24 | 17 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 29% | 34% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 32/57 | 20/34 | 52/91 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 59% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 17/20 | 41/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 85% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/25 | 9/14 | 23/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 64% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 6/13 | 10/19 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 46% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 0/1 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 0% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Paulson | ||||
| R1 Jorda Sanchis |
R2 Kym |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-64 | 7-65 6-76 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 35 | 60 | |
| pts | 88-81 | 114-102 | 202-183 | |
| Total points | 169 | 216 | 385 | |
| Winners | 36 | 47 | 83 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 16 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 44/70 | 58/115 | 102/185 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 50% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 36/44 | 47/58 | 83/102 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/26 | 31/57 | 44/83 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 54% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/15 | 3/5 | 6/20 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 60% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 1/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 33% | 42% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWWLLW
LWWLWWLWLW Tennis Scores in Liberec Challenger
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (3-6 6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hugo DellienDellien – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jiri Barnat/Filip DudaBarnat/Filip Duda – Manuel Guinard/Vitaliy SachkoGuinard/Vitaliy Sachko (7-5 3-6 12-10) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hugo DellienDellien – Manuel GuinardGuinard (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
