Botic Van De Zandschulp and Henri Squire will clash against each other in the quarter of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.3
Henri Squire -> 3.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Henri Squire
This will be the 2nd time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Henri Squire clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Van De Zandschulp won 7-5 7-6(2) in the quarter in the Braunschweig Challenger back in July 2024.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
21 - 22win/loss
80
22
LLWWWLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-32 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 5-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 84, the Dutch reached the quarter after defeating Rudolf Molleker 6-3 6-4 and Gerard Campana Lee 6-1 3-6 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Dutch defeated Campana Lee (6-1 3-6 6-4). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 89 points vs Campana Lee’s 79. Botic was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 51% of his first serves in, winning 68% (27/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (16/39) on the 2nd serve. Van De Zandschulp broke Campana Lee 7 times after converting 47% of his break points (7/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Van De Zandschulp has dropped 1 set in this tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (333-196). 14-11 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Van De Zandschulp has an aggregate 158-93 record in the last years on clay.
The Dutch’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Braunschweig Challenger.
The Dutch has an aggregate 20-22 win-loss record in 2024, 14-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Botic has never competed in this tournament before.
Henri Squire
35 - 24win/loss
190
169
LLWLLLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-29 | 1-3 | 21-13 | 16-10 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-38 | 7-4 | 30-25 | 15-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 38-31 | 1-2 | 8-11 | 27-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 21-8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 184, the German got to the quarter after beating Jan Choinski 6-2 6-2 and Marko Topo 3-6 6-3 7-5.
In the 2nd round against Topo, The German recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 7-5).During the match Squire scored less points (1) than Topo. In fact, the world no. 84 won 91 points vs Topo’s. That means that Squire was more focused during the important points. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Squire fired 7 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Henri Squire lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Squire put 59% of his first serves in, winning 78% (43/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (18/39) on the 2nd serve. Henri broke Topo 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Henri has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Hamburg Challenger where he beat Clement Chidekh in the final 6-4 6-2.
Henri has a compiled 35-23 win-loss record in 2024, 18-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 45 | 46 |
| Pts | 163-141 | 150-129 |
| Total Points | 304 | 279 |
| Winners | 59 | 77 |
| %Winners | 36% | 51% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Squire played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Botic Van De Zandschulp conceded 1 set, while Henri Squire conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Van De Zandschulp and Squire have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Van De Zandschulp played 1 game less than Squire. Botic scored 59 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Squire scored 77 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 6.5 | 7.5 |
| 1st in | 78/148 | 91/142 |
| %1st in | 53% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 59/78 | 77/91 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 30/70 | 20/51 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 39% |
Van De Zandschulp scored 13 aces (6.5 per match). Squire struck 15 aces (7.5 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 76% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Squire won 85% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 7 |
| Converted | 10/21 | 7/22 |
| % Converted | 48% | 32% |
| Conceded | 13 | 4 |
| Saved | 8 | 2 |
| % Saved | 62% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 |
Botic broke his opponents 10 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Squire broke his opponents 7 times with a 32% conversion rate. Henri conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||
| R1 Molleker |
R2 Campana Lee |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 26 | 45 | |
| pts | 74-62 | 89-79 | 163-141 | |
| Total points | 136 | 168 | 304 | |
| Winners | 32 | 27 | 59 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 30% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 5 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 8 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 38/69 | 40/79 | 78/148 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 51% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 32/38 | 27/40 | 59/78 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 68% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 16/39 | 30/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 41% | 43% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 7/15 | 10/21 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 47% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 | 13 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 3/8 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 38% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Squire | ||||
| R1 Choinski |
R2 Topo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 30 | 46 | |
| pts | 59-37 | 91-92 | 150-129 | |
| Total points | 96 | 183 | 279 | |
| Winners | 34 | 43 | 77 | |
| %Winners | 58% | 47% | 51% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 7 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 36/48 | 55/94 | 91/142 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 59% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 34/36 | 43/55 | 77/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 78% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 2/12 | 18/39 | 20/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 17% | 46% | 39% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 3/10 | 7/22 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 30% | 32% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLLWLW
LLWLLLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Henri SquireSquire (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (1-2) – H2H and prediction
