Clement Tabur and Raphael Collignon will clash against each other in the quarter of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:00 pm on COURT 7. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Raphael Collignon who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Raphael Collignon is the pick to win this match.
Raphael Collignon -> 1.285
Clement Tabur -> 3.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Clement Tabur vs. Raphael Collignon
There is no head to head record between Clement Tabur and Raphael Collignon since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Clement Tabur
18 - 21win/loss
327
202
LWWLLLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-33 | 2-4 | 25-26 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 62-25 | 16-7 | 45-14 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-26 | 20-8 | 16-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-22 | 9-4 | 25-17 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 21-12 | 11-4 | 6-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 258, the French player reached the quarter after beating Max Schoenhaus 6-7(5) 6-0 6-4 and Stefano Travaglia 5-7 6-2 6-1.
In the 2nd round against Travaglia, Clement recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-2 6-1). During the match, Tabur scored 98 points vs Travaglia’s 75. Tabur was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tabur blasted 2 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Clement Tabur was pretty efficient on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 51% (23/45) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 5 times. Clement broke Travaglia 8 times after converting 62% of his break points (8/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Clement has conceded 2 set in this tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Tabur has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (242-160). 18-17 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tabur has a compiled141-89 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
The French player best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Antalya and the Kigali 2 Challenger.
The French player has a compiled 18-21 win-loss record in 2024, 18-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Clement has never competed in this tournament before.
Raphael Collignon
46 - 13win/loss
138
138
LWWWWWWLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 67-22 | 5-3 | 46-8 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-16 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 61-22 | 14-4 | 38-12 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-20 | 11-11 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-6 | 6-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 306, Raphael got to the quarter after defeating Diego Dedura-Palomero 6-4 6-4 and Marco Trungelliti 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Collignon had a good straight sets win against Trungelliti (6-4 6-4). During the match Collignon scored 73 points vs Trungelliti’s 66. Raphael was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Collignon bagged 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Raphael Collignon lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Collignon put 60% of his first serves in, winning 68% (26/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the 2nd serve. The Belgian broke Trungelliti 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Collignon hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
The Belgian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Hammamet,M25 Angers,M25 Deauville,M25 Marburg and M25 Kassel.
Raphael has an overall 46-13 win-loss record in 2024, 32-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tabur | Collignon |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 56 | 40 |
| Pts | 203-160 | 149-130 |
| Total Points | 363 | 279 |
| Winners | 60 | 54 |
| %Winners | 30% | 36% |
Both Tabur and Collignon played 2 matches. At the moment, Clement Tabur lost 2 sets while Raphael Collignon hasn’t lost a set so far. Tabur has played 2 sets more than Collignon (6 vs 4). Therefore, Tabur played 16 games more than Collignon. Clement scored 60 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Raphael blasted 54 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tabur | Collignon |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 80/170 | 71/125 |
| %1st in | 47% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 60/80 | 54/71 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 48/90 | 31/54 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 57% |
Tabur managed to score 8 aces (4 per match). Collignon scored 13 aces (6.5 per match). Tabur won 75% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Collignon won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tabur | Collignon |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 14 | 5 |
| Converted | 14/24 | 5/21 |
| % Converted | 58% | 24% |
| Conceded | 14 | 10 |
| Saved | 7 | 9 |
| % Saved | 50% | 90% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 1 |
Tabur broke his opponents 14 times with a 58% conversion rate. Tabur conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Raphael broke his opponents 5 times with a 24% conversion rate. Collignon conceded his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tabur | ||||
| R1 Schoenhaus |
R2 Travaglia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-0 6-4 | 5-7 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 27 | 56 | |
| pts | 105-85 | 98-75 | 203-160 | |
| Total points | 190 | 173 | 363 | |
| Winners | 34 | 26 | 60 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 27% | 30% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 2 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 7 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 44/89 | 36/81 | 80/170 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 44% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 34/44 | 26/36 | 60/80 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 72% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/45 | 23/45 | 48/90 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 51% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 8 | 14 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 8/13 | 14/24 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 62% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 9 | 14 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 4/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 44% | 52% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 | 7 | |
| Collignon | ||||
| R1 Dedura-Palomero |
R2 Trungelliti |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | 40 | |
| pts | 76-64 | 73-66 | 149-130 | |
| Total points | 140 | 139 | 279 | |
| Winners | 28 | 26 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 5 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 33/62 | 38/63 | 71/125 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 60% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 26/38 | 54/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 68% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 15/25 | 31/54 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 60% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/11 | 3/10 | 5/21 | |
| Converted % | 18% | 30% | 24% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 4/5 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 80% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLLWWL
LWWWWWWLLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Calvin HemeryHemery (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (1-2) – H2H and prediction
