Bernard Tomic and Micah Braswell will play each other in the 2nd round of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on STADIUM 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Micah Braswell who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Micah Braswell is the pick to win this match.
Micah Braswell -> 1.74
Bernard Tomic -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bernard Tomic vs. Micah Braswell
There is no head to head record between Bernard Tomic and Micah Braswell since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Bernard Tomic
33 - 18win/loss
238
17
WLLLWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-18 | 25-14 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-27 | 35-19 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-12 | 24-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-12 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 238, Bernard reached the 2nd round after beating Stefan Kozlov 6-4 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Australian defeated Kozlov (6-4 3-6 6-3). During the match, Tomic scored 98 points vs Kozlov’s 94. Bernard was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tomic struck 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Bernard Tomic was exceptionally effective on serve to win 71% (32/45) of his 1st serve and 54% (22/41) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Tomic broke Kozlov 4 times after converting 25% of his break points (4/16).
Tomic has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (240-190). 25-14 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tomic has an overall 161-99 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Bernard’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Chennai,M25 Xalapa and M25 Tulsa.
Bernard has a composed 33-18 win-loss record in 2024, 25-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Micah Braswell
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-4 | 12-3 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 7-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 736, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Christian Langmo 7-5 6-0, Yuta Shimizu 7-6(0) 6-4 and Bruno Kuzuhara 7-6(4) 6-3.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Kuzuhara (7-64 6-3). During the match Braswell scored 68 points vs Kuzuhara’s 61. The American was very aggressive to blast 46 winners.
About the serving games, Braswell scored 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Micah Braswell conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Braswell put 76% of his first serves in, winning 82% (46/56) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (8/18) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Kuzuhara once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Braswell’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Wichita.
The American has an aggregate 15-4 win-loss record in 2024, 12-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Braswell has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tomic | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 63 |
| Pts | 98-94 | 205-171 |
| Total Points | 192 | 376 |
| Winners | 32 | 98 |
| %Winners | 33% | 48% |
Tomic played 1 match while Braswell competed in 3 matches. Braswell started his run from the qualifications while Tomic had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Bernard Tomic surrendered 1 set while Micah Braswell hasn’t conceded a set so far. Tomic has played 3 set(s) less than Braswell (3 vs 6). Therefore, Tomic played 35 games less than Braswell. Tomic scored 32 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 98 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tomic | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 45/86 | 131/198 |
| %1st in | 52% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 32/45 | 98/131 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 22/41 | 34/67 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 51% |
Tomic scored 6 aces . Braswell bagged 11 aces (3.7 per match). Tomic won 71% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Braswell won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tomic | Braswell |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 10 |
| Converted | 4/16 | 10/21 |
| % Converted | 25% | 48% |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 40% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Bernard broke his opponent 4 times with a 25% conversion rate. Bernard conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 10 times with a 48% conversion rate. Braswell conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tomic | |||
| R1 Kozlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 98-94 | 98-94 | |
| Total points | 192 | 192 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 45/86 | 45/86 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 32/45 | 32/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/41 | 22/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/16 | 4/16 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Braswell | |||||
| Q1 Langmo |
Q3 Shimizu |
R1 Kuzuhara |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-0 | 7-60 6-4 | 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 23 | 22 | 63 | |
| pts | 63-40 | 74-70 | 68-61 | 205-171 | |
| Total points | 103 | 144 | 129 | 376 | |
| Winners | 23 | 29 | 46 | 98 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 39% | 68% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 31/52 | 44/72 | 56/74 | 131/198 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 61% | 76% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 29/44 | 46/56 | 98/131 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 66% | 82% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/28 | 8/18 | 34/67 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 46% | 44% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/11 | 1/2 | 10/21 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 36% | 50% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/5 | 1/1 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 40% | 100% | 190% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLLWWLWWW
WWWLLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Lexington Challenger
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur GeaGea – Brandon HoltHolt (6-3 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Luke SavilleSaville (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Omni KumarKumar – Charles BroomBroom (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-64 0-6 7-67) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Aidan MchughMchugh (2-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Micah BraswellBraswell – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Taha BaadiBaadi (1-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Stefan KozlovKozlov (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (7-63 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (2-6 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (5-7 7-5 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Ricardas BerankisBerankis (6-4 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Kaichi UchidaUchida (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Matias SotoSoto (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (7-6(3) 3-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
