Botic Van De Zandschulp and Gerard Campana Lee will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.162
Gerard Campana Lee -> 4.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Gerard Campana Lee
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Gerard Campana Lee since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
19 - 22win/loss
84
22
WLLWLWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-22 | 4-7 | 13-11 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 84, the Dutch got to the 2nd round after defeating Rudolf Molleker 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Botic had a good straight sets win against Molleker (6-3 6-4). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 74 points vs Molleker’s 62. Van De Zandschulp was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp scored 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 55% of his first serves in, winning 84% (32/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (14/31) on the 2nd serve. Van De Zandschulp broke Molleker 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (332-196). 13-11 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has an overall 157-93 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Botic’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Braunschweig Challenger.
Botic has a compiled 19-22 win-loss record in 2024, 13-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
The Dutch has never competed in this tournament before.
Gerard Campana Lee
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-20 | 0-0 | 18-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 1-3 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 360, Gerard got to the 2nd round after defeating Javier Barranco Cosano 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, Gerard had a good straight sets win against Barranco Cosano (7-65 7-65). During the match Campana Lee scored 96 points vs Barranco Cosano’s 86. The Korean was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Campana Lee struck 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Gerard Campana Lee lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Campana Lee put 62% of his first serves in, winning 69% (41/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the 2nd serve. Gerard broke Barranco Cosano 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
The Korean’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Skopje Challenger.
Gerard has an overall 18-20 win-loss record in 2024, 18-20 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Campana Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 26 |
| Pts | 74-62 | 96-86 |
| Total Points | 136 | 182 |
| Winners | 32 | 41 |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Campana Lee played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van De Zandschulp and Campana Lee have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Van De Zandschulp played 7 games less than Campana Lee. Botic scored 32 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Campana Lee blasted 41 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Campana Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
| 1st in | 38/69 | 59/95 |
| %1st in | 55% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 32/38 | 41/59 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 20/36 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 56% |
Van De Zandschulp struck 8 aces . Campana Lee struck 4 aces . Van De Zandschulp won 84% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Campana Lee won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Campana Lee |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 50% | 50% |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 |
| Saved | 5 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Van De Zandschulp broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 5 break points. The Korean broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Korean conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Molleker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 74-62 | 74-62 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/69 | 38/69 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 32/38 | 32/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/31 | 14/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Campana Lee | |||
| R1 Barranco Cosano |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 96-86 | 96-86 | |
| Total points | 182 | 182 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 59/95 | 59/95 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 41/59 | 41/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLLLWWLL
WLWLWLLWLL Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (7-65 7-65) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (6-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Nicolas ZanellatoZanellato (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Facundo MenaMena (7-65 7-66) – See score progression
- Clement TaburTabur – Max SchoenhausSchoenhaus (6-75 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri (6-0 6-75 6-1) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Mirza BasicBasic (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Diego Dedura-PalomeroDedura-Palomero (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Jurij RodionovRodionov (4-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Marlon VankanVankan (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Ignacio BuseBuse – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Justin EngelEngel (2-6 6-4 7-66) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Clement TaburTabur (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Calvin HemeryHemery (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
