Adrian Oetzbach and Marlon Vankan will square off in the qualifications of the Luedenscheid Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 7. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marlon Vankan who should win in 3 sets.
Marlon Vankan -> 1.72
Adrian Oetzbach -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Adrian Oetzbach vs. Marlon Vankan
This will be the 2nd time that Adrian Oetzbach and Marlon Vankan square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Vankan (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Vankan won 6-3 6-7(3) 10-6 in the qualifications in M15 Esch/Alzette back in 2021.
Adrian Oetzbach
27 - 26win/loss
637
502
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-37 | 7-8 | 25-23 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
| 2023 | 57-40 | 11-13 | 38-20 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 38-26 | 16-9 | 19-13 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-16 | 9-4 | 20-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-9 | 10-8 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 507, the German got to the qualifications after beating Patrick Zahraj 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Zahraj (6-4 6-4). During the match, Oetzbach scored 72 points vs Zahraj’s 60. Adrian was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Regarding the service games, Oetzbach bagged 4 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Overall, Adrian Oetzbach was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (19/26) of his 1st serve and 57% (20/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Adrian broke Zahraj 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Oetzbach has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (211-149). 21-18 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Oetzbach has a compiled134-90 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
The German’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Hammamet,M15 Sharm ElSheikh,M15 Meerbusch and M15 Alkmaar.
The German has an overall 27-25 win-loss record in 2024, 21-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Luedenscheid Challenger
Adrian has never competed in this tournament before.
Marlon Vankan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-28 | 0-0 | 28-28 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-23 | 3-7 | 29-15 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-27 | 6-10 | 19-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 27-21 | 0-0 | 26-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 583, Marlon reached the qualifications after beating Nick Mertgens 6-4 6-0.
In the qualifications, Vankan had a good straight sets win against Mertgens (6-4 6-0). During the match Vankan scored 63 points vs Mertgens’s 41. Marlon was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Vankan bagged 8 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Marlon Vankan was quite effective on serve to win 85% (23/27) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Vankan broke Mertgens 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
The German’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Antalya.
Marlon has a compiled 19-16 win-loss record in 2024, 19-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Oetzbach | Vankan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 16 |
| Pts | 72-60 | 63-41 |
| Total Points | 132 | 104 |
| Winners | 19 | 23 |
| %Winners | 26% | 37% |
Both Oetzbach and Vankan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Oetzbach and Vankan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Oetzbach played 4 games more than Vankan. Adrian scored 19 winners (26% of the total points). On the other side, Vankan managed to score 23 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Oetzbach | Vankan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 8 |
| 1st in | 26/61 | 27/48 |
| %1st in | 43% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 23/27 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 20/35 | 12/21 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 57% |
Oetzbach managed to score 4 aces . Vankan fired 8 aces . Oetzbach won 73% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Vankan won 85% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Oetzbach | Vankan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 57% | 40% |
| Conceded | 5 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 60% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The German broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Adrian surrendered his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Vankan broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Marlon was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Oetzbach | |||
| Q1 Zahraj | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 72-60 | 72-60 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 26/61 | 26/61 | |
| % 1st in | 43% | 43% | |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 19/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/35 | 20/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Vankan | |||
| Q1 Mertgens | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 63-41 | 63-41 | |
| Total points | 104 | 104 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 27/48 | 27/48 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 23/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 12/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Luedenscheid Challenger
- Nicolas ZanellatoZanellato – Stijn SlumpSlump (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Mirza BasicBasic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Henri SquireSquire (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Facundo MenaMena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian OetzbachOetzbach – Marlon VankanVankan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clement TaburTabur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max Alcala GurriAlcala Gurri – Fabien SalleSalle (0-0) – H2H and prediction