Terence Atmane and Radu Albot will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Citi Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 12:30 pm on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Radu Albot who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Radu Albot is the pick to win this match.
Radu Albot -> 1.87
Terence Atmane -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Terence Atmane vs. Radu Albot
This will be the 3rd time that Terence Atmane and Radu Albot face off. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played, Atmane won 7-6(4) 6-2 in the 2nd round in the Ilkley Challenger back in June 2024.
Terence Atmane
27 - 23win/loss
158
118
LWLWWLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-32 | 30-20 | 5-5 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-10 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 118 (career-high), the French player reached the qualifications after defeating Liam Broady 7-6(4) 6-4.
In the qualifications, Terence had a good straight sets win against Broady (7-64 6-4). During the match, Atmane scored 76 points vs Broady’s 66. Terence was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Atmane managed to score 15 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Terence Atmane was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (32/39) of his 1st serve and 59% (16/27) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The French player broke Broady once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Atmane has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (192-113). 19-11 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Atmane has an aggregate148-74 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
The French player best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Granby Challenger.
Terence has a composed 27-22 win-loss record in 2024, 19-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
Terence has never competed in this tournament before.
Radu Albot
30 - 21win/loss
163
39
LLWWLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-26 | 12-9 | 17-11 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-34 | 10-13 | 13-8 | 12-10 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-30 | 25-14 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-27 | 4-9 | 2-8 | 13-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-18 | 0-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 151, the Moldovan got to the qualifications after beating Eliot Spizzirri 6-0 6-2.
In the qualifications, Albot had a good straight sets win against Spizzirri (6-0 6-2). During the match Albot scored 56 points vs Spizzirri’s 31. The Moldovan was very aggressive to blast 19 winners.
About the serving games, Albot made 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Radu Albot was quite effective on serve to win 73% (19/26) of his 1st serve and 77% (10/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Moldovan broke Spizzirri 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Albot’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Girona Challenger.
The Moldovan has an aggregate 29-21 win-loss record in 2024, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Atmane | Albot |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 14 |
| Pts | 76-66 | 56-31 |
| Total Points | 142 | 87 |
| Winners | 32 | 19 |
| %Winners | 42% | 34% |
Both Atmane and Albot played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Atmane and Albot have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Atmane played 9 games more than Albot. Atmane scored 32 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Albot managed to score 19 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Atmane | Albot |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 15 | 3 |
| 1st in | 39/66 | 26/39 |
| %1st in | 59% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 19/26 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 10/13 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 77% |
Atmane made 15 aces . Albot fired 3 aces . Atmane won 82% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Albot won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 77% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Atmane | Albot |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 5 |
| Converted | 1/4 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 25% | 50% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Terence broke his opponent once with a 25% conversion rate. Atmane pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Moldovan broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Albot was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Atmane | |||
| Q1 Broady |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 76-66 | 76-66 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/66 | 39/66 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 32/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/27 | 16/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/4 | 1/4 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Albot | |||
| Q1 Spizzirri |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 56-31 | 56-31 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 26/39 | 26/39 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 19/26 | 19/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/13 | 10/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 77% | 77% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWWW
LLWWLWWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David GoffinGoffin – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Christian GarinGarin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Borna CoricCoric (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Radu AlbotAlbot (1-1) – H2H and prediction
