Zachary Svajda and Mitchell Krueger will play each other in the qualifications of the Citi Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 12:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zachary Svajda who should win in 3 sets.
Zachary Svajda -> 1.44
Mitchell Krueger -> 2.66
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Zachary Svajda vs. Mitchell Krueger
This will be the 3rd time that Zachary Svajda and Mitchell Krueger fight against each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Svajda and Krueger (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Svajda won 6-3 7-5 in the 1st round in the Phoenix Challenger back in March 2024.
Zachary Svajda
27 - 23win/loss
115
113
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-23 | 19-12 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-24 | 28-8 | 2-6 | 10-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-23 | 25-14 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-13 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 115, Svajda got to the qualifications after beating Yasutaka Uchiyama 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Uchiyama (6-4 6-3). During the match, Svajda scored 71 points vs Uchiyama’s 51. The American was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Svajda bagged 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Zachary Svajda was very efficient on serve to win 84% (26/31) of his 1st serve and 70% (16/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Zachary broke Uchiyama twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Svajda has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (150-110). 19-12 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Svajda has a composed113-63 record in the last 7 years on hard.
Svajda’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger.
Svajda has an aggregate 27-23 win-loss record in 2024, 19-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
Mitchell Krueger
32 - 19win/loss
202
135
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-19 | 21-9 | 9-7 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 202, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Denis Yevseyev 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Yevseyev (6-2 6-4). During the match Krueger scored 61 points vs Yevseyev’s 44. Krueger was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Krueger recorded 3 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mitchell Krueger was quite efficient on serve to win 77% (23/30) of his 1st serve and 81% (13/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mitchell broke Yevseyev 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Indian Wells 1 Challenger where he defeated Brandon Holt in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4 and the Little Rock Challenger where he beat Yuta Shimizu in the final 6-3 6-4.
The American has an aggregate 32-19 win-loss record in 2024, 21-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2017, 2018 and 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Svajda | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 18 |
| Pts | 71-51 | 61-44 |
| Total Points | 122 | 105 |
| Winners | 26 | 23 |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% |
Both Svajda and Krueger played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Svajda and Krueger have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Svajda played 1 game more than Krueger. Zachary scored 26 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Mitchell recorded 23 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Svajda | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 31/54 | 30/46 |
| %1st in | 57% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 23/30 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 16/23 | 13/16 |
| %2nd pts | 70% | 81% |
Svajda scored 2 aces . Krueger blasted 3 aces . Svajda won 84% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Krueger won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 81% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Svajda | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/10 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 20% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 |
| Saved | 3 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Zachary broke his opponent twice with a 20% conversion rate. Zachary pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 3 break points. Krueger broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Krueger was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Svajda | |||
| Q1 Uchiyama | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 71-51 | 71-51 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/54 | 31/54 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 26/31 | 26/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/23 | 16/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 2/10 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Krueger | |||
| Q1 Yevseyev | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 61-44 | 61-44 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 30/46 | 30/46 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 23/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/16 | 13/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 81% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David GoffinGoffin – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Christian GarinGarin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Borna CoricCoric (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Radu AlbotAlbot (1-1) – H2H and prediction