Gabriel Diallo and Jacob Fearnley will play each other in the semifinal of the Chicago Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jacob Fearnley who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jacob Fearnley is the pick to win this match.
Jacob Fearnley -> 1.86
Gabriel Diallo -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gabriel Diallo vs. Jacob Fearnley
There is no head to head record between Gabriel Diallo and Jacob Fearnley since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Gabriel Diallo
23 - 16win/loss
86
86
LWWLWWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 49-25 | 30-12 | 7-6 | 9-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-28 | 8-11 | 2-2 | 24-10 | 5-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-10 | 17-6 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-4 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 169, Diallo reached the semifinal after beating James Kent Trotter 6-4 6-2, Joao Fonseca 7-6(1) 6-1 and Mitchell Krueger 6-3 6-2.
In the quarter, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Krueger (6-3 6-2). During the match, Diallo scored 53 points vs Krueger’s 38. The Canadian was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Diallo scored 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Gabriel Diallo was pretty effective on serve to win 80% (24/30) of his 1st serve and 67% (12/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Canadian broke Krueger 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gabriel hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 58% of the points he played.
Diallo has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 62% of his matches (106-66). 9-5 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Diallo has a composed49-29 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
Gabriel’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Canberra Challenger.
Diallo has an overall 22-16 win-loss record in 2024, 9-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chicago Challenger
The Canadian has never competed in this tournament before.
Jacob Fearnley
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-9 | 10-2 | 0-0 | 26-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 225 (career-high), Jacob reached the semifinal after beating Cooper Williams 6-1 7-6(8), Antoine Bellier 4-6 6-3 6-0, Li Tu 6-4 6-3, Terence Atmane 6-2 1-6 7-6(3) and Brandon Holt 6-3 6-2.
In the quarter, Jacob had a good straight sets win against Holt (6-3 6-2). During the match Fearnley scored 58 points vs Holt’s 42. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Fearnley scored 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jacob Fearnley lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Fearnley put 56% of his first serves in, winning 86% (24/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. Fearnley was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Holt 4 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jacob started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
His best result of the year was conquering the title the Nottingham 2 Challenger where he defeated Charles Broom in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Jacob has a composed 22-3 win-loss record in 2024, 5-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Diallo | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 12 |
| Tot Games | 55 | 109 |
| Pts | 179-131 | 362-302 |
| Total Points | 310 | 664 |
| Winners | 79 | 163 |
| %Winners | 44% | 45% |
Diallo played 3 matches while Fearnley competed in 5 matches. Fearnley started his run from the qualifications while Diallo had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jacob Fearnley lost 2 sets while Gabriel Diallo hasn’t dropped a set so far. Diallo has played 6 set(s) less than Fearnley (6 vs 12). Therefore, Diallo played 54 games less than Fearnley. Diallo scored 79 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Jacob managed to score 163 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Diallo | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 25 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 8.3 | 3.6 |
| 1st in | 101/154 | 204/325 |
| %1st in | 66% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 79/101 | 163/204 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 37/53 | 56/121 |
| %2nd pts | 70% | 46% |
Diallo fired 25 aces (8.3 per match). Fearnley made 18 aces (3.6 per match). Diallo won 78% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Fearnley won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Diallo | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 19 |
| Converted | 9/17 | 19/33 |
| % Converted | 53% | 58% |
| Conceded | 0 | 19 |
| Saved | 0 | 11 |
| % Saved | 0% | 58% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 8 |
The Canadian broke his opponents 9 times with a 53% conversion rate. Gabriel pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Jacob broke his opponents 19 times with a 58% conversion rate. Fearnley conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.
| Diallo | |||||
| R1 Kent |
R2 Fonseca |
1/4 Krueger |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 7-61 6-1 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 20 | 17 | 55 | |
| pts | 62-49 | 64-44 | 53-38 | 179-131 | |
| Total points | 111 | 108 | 91 | 310 | |
| Winners | 26 | 29 | 24 | 79 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 45% | 45% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 8 | 8 | 25 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 37/56 | 34/50 | 30/48 | 101/154 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 68% | 63% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 26/37 | 29/34 | 24/30 | 79/101 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 85% | 80% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 12/16 | 12/18 | 37/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 75% | 67% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/6 | 3/6 | 9/17 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 50% | 50% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | – | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Fearnley | |||||||
| Q1 Williams |
Q3 Bellier |
R1 Tu |
R2 Atmane |
1/4 Holt |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-68 | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | 6-4 6-3 | 6-2 1-6 7-63 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 12 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 25 | 19 | 28 | 17 | 109 | |
| pts | 79-64 | 82-65 | 57-46 | 86-85 | 58-42 | 362-302 | |
| Total points | 143 | 147 | 103 | 171 | 100 | 664 | |
| Winners | 37 | 40 | 24 | 38 | 24 | 163 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 49% | 42% | 44% | 41% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 24 | |
| 1st in | 41/71 | 51/73 | 32/47 | 52/84 | 28/50 | 204/325 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 70% | 68% | 62% | 56% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 37/41 | 40/51 | 24/32 | 38/52 | 24/28 | 163/204 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 78% | 75% | 73% | 86% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/30 | 10/22 | 8/15 | 15/32 | 11/22 | 56/121 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 45% | 53% | 47% | 50% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 19 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/9 | 4/6 | 3/7 | 4/4 | 19/33 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 56% | 67% | 43% | 100% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 19 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 3/5 | 0/1 | 2/5 | 1/2 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 60% | 0% | 40% | 50% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWWLW
LWWLWWLWLW Tennis Scores in Chicago Challenger
- Mac Kiger/Benjamin SigouinKiger/Benjamin Sigouin – Charles Broom/Jacob FearnleyBroom/Jacob Fearnley (2-6 6-3 12-10) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
