Learner Tien and Aidan Mayo will square off in the 2nd round of the Chicago Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Learner Tien who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Learner Tien is the pick to win this match.
Learner Tien -> 1.55
Aidan Mayo -> 2.35
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Learner Tien vs. Aidan Mayo
There is no head to head record between Learner Tien and Aidan Mayo since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Learner Tien
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 60-12 | 53-8 | 0-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-10 | 20-10 | 0-0 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 8-5 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 258 (career-high), Tien got to the 2nd round after beating Benjamin Bonzi 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Bonzi (6-4 6-4). During the match, Tien scored 60 points vs Bonzi’s 51. Learner was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tien made 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Learner Tien was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (32/41) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Bonzi twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Tien has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 75% of his matches (72-24). 30-2 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Tien has a compiled58-17 win-loss record in the last 3 years on hard.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Bloomfield Hills Challenger where he overcame Nishesh Basavareddy in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Learner has a composed 30-3 win-loss record in 2024, 30-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chicago Challenger
Tien has never competed in this tournament before.
Aidan Mayo
13 - 19win/loss
304
269
WWWWWLLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-30 | 11-16 | 4-4 | 7-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-28 | 24-15 | 2-5 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-25 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 293, Aidan reached the 2nd round after beating Garrett Johns 6-3 7-6(13), Nicolas Mejia 7-6(3) 6-2 and Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-4 3-6 7-5.
In the 1st round, The American defeated Pablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 7-5). During the match Mayo scored 94 points vs Pablo Ficovich’s 92. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Mayo recorded 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Aidan Mayo lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Mayo put 55% of his first serves in, winning 65% (30/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (20/37) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Pablo Ficovich 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
Mayo has an aggregate 13-18 win-loss record in 2024, 8-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tien | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 74 |
| Pts | 60-51 | 271-239 |
| Total Points | 111 | 510 |
| Winners | 32 | 105 |
| %Winners | 53% | 39% |
Tien played 1 match while Mayo competed in 3 matches. Mayo started his run from the qualifications while Tien had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Aidan Mayo surrendered 1 set while Learner Tien hasn’t dropped a set so far. Tien has played 5 set(s) less than Mayo (2 vs 7). Therefore, Tien played 54 games less than Mayo. The American scored 32 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, The American scored 105 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tien | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 41/54 | 143/245 |
| %1st in | 76% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 32/41 | 105/143 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 56/102 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 55% |
Tien made 4 aces . Mayo made 7 aces (2.3 per match). Tien won 78% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Mayo won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tien | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 9 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 9/30 |
| % Converted | 40% | 30% |
| Conceded | 0 | 16 |
| Saved | 0 | 11 |
| % Saved | 0% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Tien broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The American quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Aidan broke his opponents 9 times with a 30% conversion rate. Mayo conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tien | |||
| R1 Bonzi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 60-51 | 60-51 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 41/54 | 41/54 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 32/41 | 32/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Mayo | |||||
| Q1 Johns |
Q3 Mejia |
R1 Pablo Ficovich |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-613 | 7-63 6-2 | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 21 | 31 | 74 | |
| pts | 96-84 | 81-63 | 94-92 | 271-239 | |
| Total points | 180 | 144 | 186 | 510 | |
| Winners | 41 | 34 | 30 | 105 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 42% | 32% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 5 | 3 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 53/85 | 44/77 | 46/83 | 143/245 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 57% | 55% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 41/53 | 34/44 | 30/46 | 105/143 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | 65% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/32 | 17/33 | 20/37 | 56/102 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 52% | 54% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 3 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 1/9 | 3/6 | 5/15 | 9/30 | |
| Converted % | 11% | 50% | 33% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 7 | 16 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4/5 | 3/7 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 80% | 43% | 223% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWLWWW
WWWWWLLLWL Tennis Scores in Chicago Challenger
- Brandon HoltHolt – Andrew FentyFenty (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Michael ZhengZheng (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Bernard TomicTomic (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Mark LajalLajal (2-6 7-66 7-5) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Li TuTu (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (2-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Alex BoltBolt (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-74 6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Arthur GeaGea (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (2-6 7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Michael ZhengZheng (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
