Seong Chan Hong and Charles Broom will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Chicago Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Seong Chan Hong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Seong Chan Hong is the pick to win this match.
Seong Chan Hong -> 1.74
Charles Broom -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Seong Chan Hong vs. Charles Broom
There is no head to head record between Seong Chan Hong and Charles Broom since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Seong Chan Hong
23 - 16win/loss
688
566
LWWLLWLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-25 | 21-19 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-27 | 14-12 | 10-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-26 | 4-7 | 23-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-15 | 9-7 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-8 | 8-3 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 181, Seong got to the 2nd round after defeating Alex Bolt 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Chan Hong had a good straight sets win against Bolt (6-4 6-3). During the match, Chan Hong scored 63 points vs Bolt’s 49. Chan Hong was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Chan Hong blasted 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Seong Chan Hong conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Chan Hong put 54% of his first serves in, winning 93% (26/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (12/24) on the 2nd serve. Seong broke Bolt 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Chan Hong has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (246-148). 28-15 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Chan Hong has a compiled 215-108 match record in the last years on hard.
Seong’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger,the Bengaluru Challenger and the Busan Challenger.
Chan Hong has a composed 28-20 win-loss record in 2024, 28-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chicago Challenger
Seong has never competed in this tournament before.
Charles Broom
31 - 21win/loss
277
235
LLWLWWWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-33 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 14-13 | 8-7 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 252, Broom reached the 2nd round after beating Sho Shimabukuro 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(5).
In the 1st round against Shimabukuro, Broom recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-2 7-65). During the match Broom scored 129 points vs Shimabukuro’s 120. The Brit was pretty aggressive to blast 48 winners.
About the serving games, Broom scored 8 aces and he was not very steady on his 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Charles Broom lost the serve 4 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Broom put 55% of his first serves in, winning 68% (48/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (27/59) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Shimabukuro 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Broom’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Nottingham and the Nottingham 2 Challenger.
The Brit has an aggregate 31-20 win-loss record in 2024, 16-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Chan Hong | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 34 |
| Pts | 63-49 | 129-120 |
| Total Points | 112 | 249 |
| Winners | 26 | 48 |
| %Winners | 41% | 37% |
Both Chan Hong and Broom played 1 match. At the moment, Charles Broom dropped 1 set while Seong Chan Hong hasn’t dropped a set so far. Chan Hong has played 1 set(s) less than Broom (2 vs 3). Therefore, Chan Hong played 15 games less than Broom. Seong scored 26 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Charles fired 48 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Chan Hong | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 8 |
| 1st in | 28/52 | 71/130 |
| %1st in | 54% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 26/28 | 48/71 |
| %1st pts | 93% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 27/59 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 46% |
Chan Hong made 8 aces . Broom managed to score 8 aces . Chan Hong won 93% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Broom won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Chan Hong | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 6/11 |
| % Converted | 60% | 55% |
| Conceded | 1 | 13 |
| Saved | 1 | 9 |
| % Saved | 100% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Seong broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Seong quite strong on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Brit broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded.
| Chan Hong | |||
| R1 Bolt |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 63-49 | 63-49 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 28/52 | 28/52 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 26/28 | 26/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 93% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/24 | 12/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Broom | |||
| R1 Shimabukuro |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 6-2 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 129-120 | 129-120 | |
| Total points | 249 | 249 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 11 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 71/130 | 71/130 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 48/71 | 48/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/59 | 27/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 9/13 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Chicago Challenger
- Brandon HoltHolt – Andrew FentyFenty (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Michael ZhengZheng (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Bernard TomicTomic (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Mark LajalLajal (2-6 7-66 7-5) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Li TuTu (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (2-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Alex BoltBolt (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-74 6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Arthur GeaGea (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (2-6 7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Michael ZhengZheng (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
