Kamil Majchrzak and Jerome Kym will square off in the 2nd round of the Zug Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jerome Kym who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jerome Kym is the pick to win this match.
Jerome Kym -> 1.86
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kamil Majchrzak vs. Jerome Kym
This will be the 2nd time that Kamil Majchrzak and Jerome Kym face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Majchrzak (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Majchrzak won 6-4 5-7 6-3 in the semifinal in the Bratislava 1 Challenger back in June 2024.
Kamil Majchrzak
49 - 11win/loss
190
75
WLLWWWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 49-11 | 16-4 | 31-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-22 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-4 | 16-9 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-10 | 1-3 | 5-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 190, Kamil reached the 2nd round after defeating Maks Kasnikowski 7-6(3) 6-3.
In the 1st round, Kamil had a good straight sets win against Kasnikowski (7-63 6-3). During the match, Majchrzak scored 74 points vs Kasnikowski’s 62. Kamil was extremely aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Majchrzak recorded 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Kamil Majchrzak was very efficient on serve to win 74% (25/34) of his 1st serve and 66% (19/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Kamil broke Kasnikowski 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Majchrzak has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (347-197). 31-6 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Majchrzak has an overall 197-103 match record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Kigali 1 Challenger where he defeated Marco Trungelliti in the final 6-4 6-4 and the Bratislava 1 Challenger where he defeated Henrique Rocha in the final 6-0 2-6 6-3.
Kamil has an aggregate 49-11 win-loss record in 2024, 31-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zug Challenger
Kamil has never competed in this tournament before.
Jerome Kym
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-12 | 6-1 | 30-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-9 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2022 | 41-22 | 17-5 | 12-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2021 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 278 (career-high), Kym reached the 2nd round after beating Juan Manuel Cerundolo 6-4 6-0.
In the 1st round, Kym had a good straight sets win against Manuel Cerundolo (6-4 6-0). During the match Kym scored 54 points vs Manuel Cerundolo’s 36. Jerome was extremely aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about serving, Kym struck 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Jerome Kym was extremely effective on serve to win 77% (17/22) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jerome broke Manuel Cerundolo 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Prostejov Challenger where he overcame Chun Hsin Tseng in the final 6-2 3-6 6-2.
Jerome has a compiled 38-12 win-loss record in 2024, 30-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Majchrzak | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 16 |
| Pts | 74-62 | 54-36 |
| Total Points | 136 | 90 |
| Winners | 25 | 17 |
| %Winners | 34% | 31% |
Both Majchrzak and Kym played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Majchrzak and Kym have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Majchrzak played 6 games more than Kym. Kamil scored 25 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Jerome blasted 17 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Majchrzak | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 34/63 | 22/45 |
| %1st in | 54% | 49% |
| 1st pts | 25/34 | 17/22 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 19/29 | 13/23 |
| %2nd pts | 66% | 57% |
Majchrzak bagged 5 aces . Kym recorded 3 aces . Majchrzak won 74% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 66% of the points. On the other side, Kym won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Majchrzak | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 50% | 56% |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Majchrzak broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Kamil surrendered his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Jerome broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Majchrzak | |||
| R1 Kasnikowski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 74-62 | 74-62 | |
| Total points | 136 | 136 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 34/63 | 34/63 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 25/34 | 25/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Kym | |||
| R1 Manuel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 54-36 | 54-36 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 22/45 | 22/45 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 17/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWWWWWWW
WLWLWLLWWW Tennis Scores in Zug Challenger
- Omar JasikaJasika – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Damien WengerWenger (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (7-65 3-6 7-65) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Remy BertolaBertola (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Dylan DietrichDietrich (6-77 7-5 7-62) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Jakub PaulPaul (4-6 6-3 7-68) – See score progression
- Henry BernetBernet – Ryan NijboerNijboer (4-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Mika BrunoldBrunold – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Henry BernetBernet – Ryan NijboerNijboer (4-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Remy BertolaBertola (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga – Dylan DietrichDietrich (6-7(7) 7-5 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Jakub PaulPaul (4-6 6-3 7-6(8)) – See score progression
- Marko TopoTopo – Damien WengerWenger (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (7-6(3) 6-3) – See score progression
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-2 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Omar JasikaJasika – Matteo GiganteGigante (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benoit PairePaire – Quentin HalysHalys (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Omar JasikaJasika (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
