Zachary Svajda and Maxime Cressy will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Atlanta Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 12:30 pm on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maxime Cressy who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Maxime Cressy is the pick to win this match.
Maxime Cressy -> 1.83
Zachary Svajda -> 1.909
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zachary Svajda vs. Maxime Cressy
This will be the 2nd time that Zachary Svajda and Maxime Cressy clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Svajda (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Svajda won 7-5 7-6(3) in the 1st round in the Ilkley Challenger back in June 2024.
Zachary Svajda
26 - 22win/loss
169
102
LWLLWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-35 | 27-21 | 2-4 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-24 | 28-8 | 2-6 | 10-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-23 | 25-14 | 0-3 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-13 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 113 (career-high), Zachary reached the qualifications after defeating Ethan Quinn 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Quinn (6-4 7-5). During the match, Svajda scored 68 points vs Quinn’s 56. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Regarding the service games, Svajda struck 8 aces and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Zachary Svajda was pretty efficient on serve to win 76% (34/45) of his 1st serve and 83% (10/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Zachary broke Quinn twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Svajda has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (148-109). 17-11 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Svajda has an overall111-62 record in the last 7 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger.
Svajda has a composed 25-22 win-loss record in 2024, 17-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Atlanta
Zachary has never competed in this tournament before.
Maxime Cressy
24 - 18win/loss
240
31
LLLLLLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-26 | 17-15 | 0-1 | 6-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-31 | 3-10 | 0-5 | 15-10 | 1-5 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 34-30 | 15-11 | 5-7 | 3-8 | 11-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-32 | 14-10 | 2-8 | 16-8 | 4-4 | 7-2 |
| 2020 | 19-17 | 3-5 | 2-4 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 180, the American reached the qualifications after defeating Radu Albot 6-3 3-6 7-5.
In the qualifications, Maxime defeated Albot (6-3 3-6 7-5). During the match Cressy and Albot scored the same amount of points (83). However, the world no. 113 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Maxime was pretty aggressive to blast 49 winners.
About the serving games, Cressy overpowered his opponent with 23 aces and he was not very steady on his 2nd serve to score 15 double faults. Maxime Cressy lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Cressy put 67% of his first serves in, winning 78% (49/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. Maxime broke Albot 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Maxime’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Cuernavaca Challenger and the Guangzhou Challenger.
Cressy has a compiled 24-17 win-loss record in 2024, 12-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Atlanta
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Svajda | Cressy |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 30 |
| Pts | 68-56 | 83-83 |
| Total Points | 124 | 166 |
| Winners | 34 | 49 |
| %Winners | 50% | 59% |
Both Svajda and Cressy played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Maxime Cressy lost 1 set while Zachary Svajda hasn’t dropped a set so far. Svajda has played 1 set(s) less than Cressy (2 vs 3). Therefore, Svajda played 8 games less than Cressy. The American scored 34 winners (50% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 49 winners (59%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Svajda | Cressy |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 23 |
| 1st in | 45/57 | 63/94 |
| %1st in | 79% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 34/45 | 49/63 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 10/12 | 13/31 |
| %2nd pts | 83% | 42% |
Svajda blasted 8 aces . Cressy managed to score 23 aces . Svajda won 76% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 83% of the points. On the other side, Cressy won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Svajda | Cressy |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 67% | 75% |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Svajda pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Maxime broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Maxime conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Svajda | |||
| Q1 Quinn |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 68-56 | 68-56 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 50% | 50% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 45/57 | 45/57 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 34/45 | 34/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/12 | 10/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 83% | 83% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Cressy | |||
| Q1 Albot |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 83-83 | 83-83 | |
| Total points | 166 | 166 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 59% | 59% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 23 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 15 | 15 | |
| 1st in | 63/94 | 63/94 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 49/63 | 49/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 13/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLWLWW
LLLLLLWLWW Tennis Scores in Atlanta
- Juncheng ShangShang – Jeff WolfWolf (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Adam WaltonWalton (7-64 3-6 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Borna CoricCoric (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Max PurcellPurcell (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Constant LestienneLestienne (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Harold MayotMayot (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – David GoffinGoffin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (1-3) – H2H and prediction
