Hynek Barton and Buvaysar Gadamauri will square off in the qualifications of the Tampere Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 7. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hynek Barton who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hynek Barton is the pick to win this match.
Hynek Barton -> 1.52
Buvaysar Gadamauri -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hynek Barton vs. Buvaysar Gadamauri
There is no head to head record between Hynek Barton and Buvaysar Gadamauri since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Hynek Barton
14 - 11win/loss
409
393
LLWLLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-23 | 9-4 | 21-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 45-26 | 11-5 | 25-16 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 458, Hynek reached the qualifications after defeating Johannes Ingildsen 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Ingildsen (6-3 6-2). During the match, Barton scored 60 points vs Ingildsen’s 40. Barton was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Barton bagged 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Hynek Barton was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (21/27) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Hynek broke Ingildsen 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Barton has a solid match record in the last 3 years having won 64% of his matches (72-41). 8-5 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Barton has an overall46-25 match record in the last 3 years on clay.
Hynek’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Vale do Lobo.
The Czech has an aggregate 14-11 win-loss record in 2024, 8-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tampere Challenger
Hynek has never competed in this tournament before.
Buvaysar Gadamauri
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-28 | 1-1 | 16-19 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-26 | 13-7 | 34-18 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-23 | 4-5 | 20-15 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-22 | 10-6 | 19-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 15-9 | 8-3 | 4-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 515 (career-high), Gadamauri got to the qualifications after beating Jiri Barnat 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Buvaysar had a good straight sets win against Barnat (6-4 6-3). During the match Gadamauri scored 64 points vs Barnat’s 48. Buvaysar was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Gadamauri bagged 3 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Buvaysar Gadamauri was very efficient on serve to win 76% (22/29) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Buvaysar broke Barnat 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Gadamauri’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Saint Dizier.
The Belgian has an aggregate 18-18 win-loss record in 2024, 12-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Barton | Gadamauri |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 19 |
| Pts | 60-40 | 64-48 |
| Total Points | 100 | 112 |
| Winners | 21 | 22 |
| %Winners | 35% | 34% |
Both Barton and Gadamauri played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Barton and Gadamauri have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Barton played 2 games less than Gadamauri. The Czech scored 21 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Belgian made 22 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Barton | Gadamauri |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
| 1st in | 27/51 | 29/43 |
| %1st in | 53% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 22/29 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 9/14 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 64% |
Barton bagged 3 aces . Gadamauri made 3 aces . Barton won 78% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Gadamauri won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Barton | Gadamauri |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 45% | 45% |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 |
| Saved | 4 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Czech broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Barton conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Gadamauri broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Gadamauri conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Barton | |||
| Q1 Ingildsen |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 60-40 | 60-40 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/51 | 27/51 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 21/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 13/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Gadamauri | |||
| Q1 Barnat |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 64-48 | 64-48 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 29/43 | 29/43 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 22/29 | 22/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWWWLW
LWLWWLWLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo MenaMena – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Mathys ErhardErhard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eero VasaVasa – Vesa AhtiAhti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristjan TammTamm – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Tristan LamasineLamasine (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Patrick KaukovaltaKaukovalta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Thomas FancuttFancutt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-0) – H2H and prediction
