Gabi Adrian Boitan and Thomas Fancutt will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Tampere Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gabi Adrian Boitan who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Gabi Adrian Boitan is the pick to win this match.
Gabi Adrian Boitan -> 1.22
Thomas Fancutt -> 3.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gabi Adrian Boitan vs. Thomas Fancutt
There is no head to head record between Gabi Adrian Boitan and Thomas Fancutt since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Gabi Adrian Boitan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 54-29 | 2-4 | 49-22 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-20 | 2-2 | 36-10 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 9-10 | 7-7 | 0-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-7 | 12-4 | 4-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 375 (career-high), Adrian Boitan got to the qualifications after defeating Peetu Pohjola 6-3 6-0.
In the qualifications, Adrian Boitan had a good straight sets win against Pohjola (6-3 6-0). During the match, Adrian Boitan scored 60 points vs Pohjola’s 33. Adrian Boitan was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Adrian Boitan scored just 1 ace in the match and he committed only 3 double faults. Gabi Adrian Boitan lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Adrian Boitan put 60% of his first serves in, winning 74% (23/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. The Romanian broke Pohjola 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Adrian Boitan has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 64% of his matches (152-85). 37-17 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Adrian Boitan has an aggregate119-60 record in the last 7 years on clay.
Adrian Boitan’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Bucharest,M15 Constanta and M15 Oradea.
Adrian Boitan has an overall 39-18 win-loss record in 2024, 37-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tampere Challenger
The Romanian has never competed in this tournament before.
Thomas Fancutt
7 - 11win/loss
792
382
LLWLWLWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-19 | 8-11 | 5-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-20 | 18-17 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 8-1 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 34-23 | 28-18 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-18 | 16-15 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 817, the Australian reached the qualifications after beating Roni Rikkonen 6-4 6-0.
In the qualifications, Fancutt had a good straight sets win against Rikkonen (6-4 6-0). During the match Fancutt scored 64 points vs Rikkonen’s 45. The Australian was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Fancutt fired 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Thomas Fancutt was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (22/30) of his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Fancutt broke Rikkonen 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Australian has an overall 7-11 win-loss record in 2024, 5-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Adrian Boitan | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 16 |
| Pts | 60-33 | 64-45 |
| Total Points | 93 | 109 |
| Winners | 23 | 22 |
| %Winners | 38% | 34% |
Both Adrian Boitan and Fancutt played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Adrian Boitan and Fancutt have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Adrian Boitan played 1 game less than Fancutt. The Romanian scored 23 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian bagged 22 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Adrian Boitan | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 6 |
| 1st in | 31/52 | 30/60 |
| %1st in | 60% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 22/30 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 19/30 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 63% |
Adrian Boitan blasted 1 ace . Fancutt also recorded 6 aces . Adrian Boitan won 74% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Fancutt won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Adrian Boitan | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/9 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 67% | 67% |
| Conceded | 9 | 3 |
| Saved | 7 | 3 |
| % Saved | 78% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Gabi broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Gabi lost his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Fancutt was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Adrian Boitan | |||
| Q1 Pohjola |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-33 | 60-33 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/52 | 31/52 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 23/31 | 23/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Fancutt | |||
| Q1 Rikkonen |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 64-45 | 64-45 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/60 | 30/60 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 22/30 | 22/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLWWWLL
LLWLWLWWLL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo MenaMena – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Mathys ErhardErhard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eero VasaVasa – Vesa AhtiAhti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristjan TammTamm – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Tristan LamasineLamasine (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Patrick KaukovaltaKaukovalta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Thomas FancuttFancutt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-0) – H2H and prediction
