Oksana Selekhmeteva and Zhibek Kulambayeva will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Prague Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:00 pm on COURT 14. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Oksana Selekhmeteva who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Oksana Selekhmeteva is the pick to win this match.
Oksana Selekhmeteva -> 1.139
Zhibek Kulambayeva -> 5.2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Oksana Selekhmeteva vs. Zhibek Kulambayeva
There is no head to head record between Oksana Selekhmeteva and Zhibek Kulambayeva since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Oksana Selekhmeteva
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-18 | 3-5 | 30-10 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-8 | 6-2 | 2-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-20 | 12-5 | 14-11 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-19 | 22-9 | 25-9 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-8 | 4-1 | 12-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 255, the Russian got to the qualifications after defeating Stephanie Wagner 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Oksana had a good straight sets win against Wagner (6-2 6-1). During the match, Selekhmeteva scored 59 points vs Wagner’s 33. Selekhmeteva was extremely aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Selekhmeteva made 3 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Oksana Selekhmeteva lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Selekhmeteva put 53% of her first serves in, winning 88% (22/25) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. The Russian broke Wagner 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
Selekhmeteva has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 67% of her matches (149-75). 1-0 on hard in 2024. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Selekhmeteva has a composed47-18 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
Her best result of the current season was winning the title the W75 Rome where she beat Lina Gjorcheska in the final 6-1 7-6(3).
Oksana has an aggregate 28-11 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Prague
Zhibek Kulambayeva
27 - 17win/loss
324
311
LLWLWWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-27 | 6-8 | 31-17 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-26 | 6-8 | 26-15 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-20 | 4-8 | 15-10 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-21 | 5-5 | 28-11 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-13 | 6-5 | 12-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 445, Zhibek reached the qualifications after beating Reka-Luca Jani 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Kazakhstani had a good straight sets win against Jani (6-3 6-1). During the match Kulambayeva scored 61 points vs Jani’s 39. The Kazakhstani was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Kulambayeva couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Zhibek Kulambayeva was very efficient on serve to win 71% (25/35) of her 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Zhibek broke Jani 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Kulambayeva has a composed 27-17 win-loss record in 2024, 7-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Prague
The Kazakhstani has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Selekhmeteva | Kulambayeva |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 16 |
| Pts | 59-33 | 61-39 |
| Total Points | 92 | 100 |
| Winners | 22 | 25 |
| %Winners | 37% | 41% |
Both Selekhmeteva and Kulambayeva played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Selekhmeteva and Kulambayeva have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Selekhmeteva played 1 game less than Kulambayeva. The Russian scored 22 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Kulambayeva made 25 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Selekhmeteva | Kulambayeva |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 25/47 | 35/50 |
| %1st in | 53% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 22/25 | 25/35 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 11/22 | 9/15 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 60% |
Selekhmeteva fired 3 aces . Kulambayeva didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Selekhmeteva won 88% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Kulambayeva won 71% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Selekhmeteva | Kulambayeva |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 71% | 63% |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Oksana broke her opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Oksana lost her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The Kazakhstani broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Kulambayeva conceded her serve once and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded.
| Selekhmeteva | |||
| Q1 Wagner |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 59-33 | 59-33 | |
| Total points | 92 | 92 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 25/47 | 25/47 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 22/25 | 22/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/22 | 11/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kulambayeva | |||
| Q1 Jani |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 61-39 | 61-39 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/50 | 35/50 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 25/35 | 25/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLLLLWW
LLWLWWLWLW Tennis Scores in Prague
- Aziz KijametovicKijametovic – Lynn Max KempenMax Kempen (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel DonevDonev – Karlo CubelicCubelic (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dimitriy VoroninVoronin – Adrian OetzbachOetzbach (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Joao Pedro SorgiPedro Sorgi – Leon HoevelerHoeveler (6-1 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Kevin KaczynskiKaczynski (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nikita MashtakovMashtakov – Florian BroskaBroska (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Igor SijslingSijsling – Jannik RotherRother (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Zhibek KulambayevaKulambayeva – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesika MaleckovaMaleckova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Conny PerrinPerrin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mona BarthelBarthel – Kathinka Von DeichmannVon Deichmann (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Louisa ChiricoChirico – Alison Van UytvanckVan Uytvanck (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Suzan LamensLamens – Rebeka MasarovaMasarova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Astra SharmaSharma (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zeynep SonmezSonmez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – Elsa JacquemotJacquemot (1-1) – H2H and prediction
