Rio Noguchi and Ryuki Matsuda will face off in the qualifications of the Granby Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Rio Noguchi who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Rio Noguchi is the pick to win this match.
Rio Noguchi -> 1.179
Ryuki Matsuda -> 4.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rio Noguchi vs. Ryuki Matsuda
There is no head to head record between Rio Noguchi and Ryuki Matsuda since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Rio Noguchi
24 - 18win/loss
301
201
LLLLLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-31 | 36-22 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-31 | 12-18 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 54-22 | 41-10 | 9-9 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-26 | 18-18 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-12 | 5-6 | 0-3 | 3-2 | 6-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 335, Noguchi reached the qualifications after defeating Quinn Vandecasteele 3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 and Ryuki Matsuda .
In the qualifications against Vandecasteele, The Japanese recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-65 6-3).During the match, Noguchi scored less points (1) than Vandecasteele. In fact, the world no. 335 won 100 points vs Vandecasteele’s. That means that Noguchi was more focused during the important points. Noguchi was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Noguchi scored just 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Rio Noguchi lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Noguchi put 60% of his first serves in, winning 61% (36/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (19/40) on the 2nd serve. Rio broke Vandecasteele 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Noguchi has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (311-215). 18-11 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Noguchi has a composed206-129 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
Rio’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Swan Hill.
The Japanese has an aggregate 23-18 win-loss record in 2024, 18-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
Ryuki Matsuda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-32 | 36-31 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-36 | 35-28 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-25 | 44-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 10-3 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 561, Matsuda got to the qualifications after defeating Nick Chappell 5-7 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications against Chappell, The Japanese recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-1 6-1). During the match Matsuda scored 86 points vs Chappell’s 57. Matsuda was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Matsuda managed to score 11 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Ryuki Matsuda lost the serve 3 times. Furthermore, Matsuda put 53% of his first serves in, winning 87% (33/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (15/34) on the 2nd serve. Matsuda broke Chappell 7 times after converting 78% of his break points (7/9).
Matsuda’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Harmon.
Matsuda has an aggregate 23-18 win-loss record in 2024, 23-18 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Granby Challenger
Ryuki has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Noguchi | Matsuda |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 26 |
| Pts | 100-101 | 86-57 |
| Total Points | 201 | 143 |
| Winners | 36 | 33 |
| %Winners | 36% | 38% |
Both Noguchi and Matsuda played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Rio Noguchi dropped 1 set, while Ryuki Matsuda surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Noguchi and Matsuda have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Noguchi played 5 games more than Matsuda. Rio scored 36 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Ryuki bagged 33 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Noguchi | Matsuda |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 11 |
| 1st in | 59/99 | 38/72 |
| %1st in | 60% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 36/59 | 33/38 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 87% |
| 2nd pts | 19/40 | 15/34 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 44% |
Noguchi managed to score 1 ace . Matsuda also scored 11 aces . Noguchi won 61% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Matsuda won 87% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Noguchi | Matsuda |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 7 |
| Converted | 6/15 | 7/9 |
| % Converted | 40% | 78% |
| Conceded | 12 | 3 |
| Saved | 7 | 0 |
| % Saved | 58% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
The Japanese broke his opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Rio conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. Ryuki broke his opponent 7 times with a 78% conversion rate. Ryuki conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Noguchi | |||
| Q1 Vandecasteele |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 100-101 | 100-101 | |
| Total points | 201 | 201 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 59/99 | 59/99 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 36/59 | 36/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/40 | 19/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 7/12 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 58% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Matsuda | |||
| Q1 Chappell |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 86-57 | 86-57 | |
| Total points | 143 | 143 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 38/72 | 38/72 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 33/38 | 33/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/34 | 15/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/9 | 7/9 | |
| Converted % | 78% | 78% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/3 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWWWWW
LWLLWWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Justin BoulaisBoulais (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Kody PearsonPearson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Andres AndradeAndrade (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Ryuki MatsudaMatsuda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taha BaadiBaadi – Hady HabibHabib (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
