Simona Waltert and Qianhui Tang will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Hungarian Grand Prix for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:30 pm on Court 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Simona Waltert who should win in 2 sets.
Simona Waltert -> 1.109
Qianhui Tang -> 5.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Simona Waltert vs. Qianhui Tang
There is no head to head record between Simona Waltert and Qianhui Tang since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Simona Waltert
18 - 20win/loss
172
107
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 34-29 | 5-4 | 16-15 | 12-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 30-28 | 4-10 | 12-8 | 11-7 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 35-27 | 9-8 | 23-12 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
2021 | 44-24 | 13-5 | 19-14 | 5-3 | 1-1 | 6-1 |
2020 | 7-8 | 5-3 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 229, Simona reached the qualifications after defeating Anastasiya Soboleva 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Waltert had a good straight sets win against Soboleva (6-4 6-2). During the match, Waltert scored 66 points vs Soboleva’s 53. The Swiss was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Waltert scored 3 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Simona Waltert lost the serve 4 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Waltert put 66% of her first serves in, winning 62% (26/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 32% (7/22) on the 2nd serve. Simona was clinical in her return game without wasting any break point and break Soboleva 7 times.
Waltert has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 59% of her matches (237-165). 10-10 on clay in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Waltert has an aggregate107-77 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
Simona’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Antalya.
The Swiss has a compiled 18-20 win-loss record in 2024, 10-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Budapest
Waltert has never competed in this tournament before.
Qianhui Tang
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 13-14 | 9-8 | 4-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 14-10 | 11-9 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Qianhui reached the qualifications after beating Amina Anshba 7-6(4) 6-4 and Simona Waltert .
In the qualifications, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Anshba (7-64 6-4). During the match Tang scored 73 points vs Anshba’s 71. The Chinese was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Tang couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 2 double faults. Qianhui Tang lost the serve 6 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Tang put 71% of her first serves in, winning 46% (24/52) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. Qianhui broke Anshba 7 times after converting 58% of her break points (7/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Qianhui started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to conquer 51% of the points she played.
Qianhui has an aggregate 5-7 win-loss record in 2024, 2-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Waltert | Tang |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 23 |
Pts | 66-53 | 73-71 |
Total Points | 119 | 144 |
Winners | 26 | 24 |
%Winners | 39% | 33% |
Both Waltert and Tang played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Waltert and Tang have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Waltert played 5 games less than Tang. Waltert scored 26 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Tang managed to score 24 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Waltert | Tang |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 0 |
Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
1st in | 42/64 | 52/73 |
%1st in | 66% | 71% |
1st pts | 26/42 | 24/52 |
%1st pts | 62% | 46% |
2nd pts | 7/22 | 10/21 |
%2nd pts | 32% | 48% |
Waltert struck 3 aces . Tang didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Waltert won 62% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 32% of the points. On the other side, Tang won 46% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Waltert | Tang |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 7 |
Converted | 7/7 | 7/12 |
% Converted | 100% | 58% |
Conceded | 10 | 13 |
Saved | 6 | 7 |
% Saved | 60% | 54% |
Times Broken | 4 | 6 |
Waltert broke her opponent 7 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Swiss dropped her serve 4 times and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. The Chinese broke her opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 54% of the break points that she conceded.
Waltert | |||
Q1 Soboleva | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 66-53 | 66-53 | |
Total points | 119 | 119 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 42/64 | 42/64 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 26/42 | 26/42 | |
% 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
2nd pts | 7/22 | 7/22 | |
% 2nd pts | 32% | 32% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/7 | 7/7 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Tang | ||||
Q1 Anshba | Q1 Anshba | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 6-4 | 7-64 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | 46 | |
pts | 73-71 | 73-71 | 146-142 | |
Total points | 144 | 144 | 288 | |
Winners | 24 | 24 | 48 | |
%Winners | 33% | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 52/73 | 52/73 | 104/146 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 71% | 71% | |
1st pts | 24/52 | 24/52 | 48/104 | |
% 1st pts | 46% | 46% | 46% | |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/21 | 20/42 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 7 | 7 | 14 | |
Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | 14/24 | |
Converted % | 58% | 58% | 58% | |
Conceded | 13 | 13 | 26 | |
Saved | 7/13 | 7/13 | 14 | |
Saved % | 54% | 54% | 108% | |
Times Broken | 6 | 6 | 12 |
Tennis Scores in Budapest
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Axel FranckFranck (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Boris AriasArias – Anthony PopyrinPopyrin (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Adil KalyanpurKalyanpur – Benjamin Winter LopezWinter Lopez (2-6 6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ignasi De Rueda De GenoverDe Rueda De Genover – Eduardo VillarVillar (3-6 6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anna SiskovaSiskova – Miriam Bianca BulgaruBianca Bulgaru (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Amarissa Kiara TothKiara Toth – Tena LukasLukas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ekaterina Makarova (1996)Makarova (1996) – Katarina ZavatskaZavatska (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Qianhui TangTang – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Anna BondarBondar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara KorpatschKorpatsch – Bernarda PeraPera (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebeka MasarovaMasarova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Suzan LamensLamens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (0-0) – H2H and prediction