Jesper De Jong and Nick Hardt will play each other in the qualifications of the Hamburg Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 12:00 pm on M1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.28
Nick Hardt -> 3.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jesper De Jong vs. Nick Hardt
There is no head to head record between Jesper De Jong and Nick Hardt since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Jesper De Jong
29 - 16win/loss
128
103
LWWLWWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-19 | 9-4 | 24-12 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 120, De Jong got to the qualifications after beating Max Hans Rehberg 7-6(5) 6-1 and Nick Hardt .
In the qualifications, Jesper had a good straight sets win against Hans Rehberg (7-65 6-1). During the match, De Jong scored 74 points vs Hans Rehberg’s 51. De Jong was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, De Jong made 7 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Jesper De Jong was extremely effective on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Dutch broke Hans Rehberg 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
De Jong has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (234-138). 21-10 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, De Jong has an overall133-73 record in the last 8 years on clay.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Sassuolo Challenger where he beat Daniel Altmaier in the final 7-6(5) 6-1.
De Jong has a compiled 29-16 win-loss record in 2024, 21-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Hamburg
Jesper has never competed in this tournament before.
Nick Hardt
38 - 18win/loss
177
177
LLLWLLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-24 | 6-6 | 32-17 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-28 | 11-9 | 10-16 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 51-25 | 18-6 | 28-16 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 44-19 | 9-6 | 35-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-11 | 6-6 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 198, Hardt got to the qualifications after defeating Marvin Moeller 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Nick had a good straight sets win against Moeller (6-2 6-4). During the match Hardt scored 74 points vs Moeller’s 59. Nick was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Hardt scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Nick Hardt was quite effective on serve to win 74% (26/35) of his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Nick broke Moeller 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Barcelona Challenger where he overcame Bernabe Zapata Miralles in the final 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Nick has a composed 38-18 win-loss record in 2024, 31-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | De Jong | Hardt |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 18 |
| Pts | 74-51 | 74-59 |
| Total Points | 125 | 133 |
| Winners | 28 | 26 |
| %Winners | 38% | 35% |
Both De Jong and Hardt played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, De Jong and Hardt have played the same amount of sets 2. However, De Jong played 2 games more than Hardt. Jesper scored 28 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Nick scored 26 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | De Jong | Hardt |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 1 |
| 1st in | 35/50 | 35/56 |
| %1st in | 70% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 26/35 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 11/21 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 52% |
De Jong managed to score 7 aces . Hardt scored 1 ace . De Jong won 80% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Hardt won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | De Jong | Hardt |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 63% | 36% |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 33% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
De Jong broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Jesper dropped his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. The Dominican broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Dominican conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| De Jong | |||
| Q1 Hans Rehberg |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 74-51 | 74-51 | |
| Total points | 125 | 125 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/50 | 35/50 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 28/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 10/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Hardt | |||
| Q1 Moeller |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 74-59 | 74-59 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 35/56 | 35/56 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 26/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 11/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLWWL
LLLWLLLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Laslo DjereDjere – Zizou BergsBergs (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Sebastian BaezBaez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Nick HardtHardt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Ugo BlanchetBlanchet (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Hugo GastonGaston (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
