Botic Van De Zandschulp and Pedro Cachin will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Braunschweig Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 4:00 pm on BRAWO CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.6
Pedro Cachin -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Pedro Cachin
This will be the 2nd time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Pedro Cachin face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Van De Zandschulp won 6-2 6-4 in the qualifications in Paris back in 2023.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
16 - 19win/loss
80
22
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 31-32 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 5-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 97, Botic got to the semifinal after defeating Matteo Martineau 6-2 6-4, Benjamin Hassan 6-1 6-2, Henri Squire 7-5 7-6(2) and Pedro Cachin .
In the quarter, Botic had a good straight sets win against Squire (7-5 7-62). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 97 points vs Squire’s 85. The Dutch was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp recorded 5 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 57% of his first serves in, winning 69% (31/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the 2nd serve. Van De Zandschulp broke Squire 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Van De Zandschulp hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 58% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (329-193). 10-8 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has an aggregate 154-90 record in the last years on clay.
The Dutch has a compiled 16-19 win-loss record in 2024, 10-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Pedro Cachin
11 - 19win/loss
287
48
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 11-26 | 0-6 | 11-19 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 32-32 | 4-8 | 28-19 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 49-22 | 5-4 | 41-13 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 47-25 | 0-0 | 47-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 23-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 117, the Argentine reached the semifinal after defeating Gregoire Barrere 6-3 6-4, Sumit Nagal 6-4 7-5 and Daniel Elahi Galan 6-4 6-4.
In the quarter, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Elahi Galan Riveros (6-4 6-4). During the match Cachin scored 65 points vs Elahi Galan Riveros’s 58. The Argentine was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Cachin managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Pedro Cachin lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Cachin put 68% of his first serves in, winning 62% (28/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the 2nd serve. Pedro broke Elahi Galan Riveros 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Argentine hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Cachin’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Prostejov Challenger.
Pedro has a composed 11-19 win-loss record in 2024, 11-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Van De Zandschulp | Cachin |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 3 |
Tot Set | 6 | 6 |
Tot Games | 58 | 61 |
Pts | 214-158 | 205-174 |
Total Points | 372 | 379 |
Winners | 78 | 88 |
%Winners | 36% | 43% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Cachin played 3 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van De Zandschulp and Cachin have played the same amount of sets 6. However, Van De Zandschulp played 3 games less than Cachin. The Dutch scored 78 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Pedro scored 88 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Cachin |
---|---|---|
Aces | 13 | 16 |
Avg per match | 4.3 | 5.3 |
1st in | 105/171 | 126/199 |
%1st in | 61% | 63% |
1st pts | 78/105 | 88/126 |
%1st pts | 74% | 70% |
2nd pts | 44/66 | 43/73 |
%2nd pts | 67% | 59% |
Van De Zandschulp made 13 aces (4.3 per match). Cachin blasted 16 aces (5.3 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 74% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Cachin won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Cachin |
---|---|---|
Won | 11 | 10 |
Converted | 11/31 | 10/23 |
% Converted | 35% | 43% |
Conceded | 11 | 19 |
Saved | 8 | 15 |
% Saved | 73% | 79% |
Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
The Dutch broke his opponents 11 times with a 35% conversion rate. Botic lost his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Pedro broke his opponents 10 times with a 43% conversion rate. Pedro conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 79% of the break points that he conceded.
Van De Zandschulp | |||||
R1 Martineau |
R2 Hassan |
1/4 Squire |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-1 6-2 | 7-5 7-62 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 15 | 25 | 58 | |
pts | 61-39 | 56-34 | 97-85 | 214-158 | |
Total points | 100 | 90 | 182 | 372 | |
Winners | 24 | 23 | 31 | 78 | |
%Winners | 39% | 41% | 32% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 5 | 3 | 5 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | |
1st in | 27/42 | 33/50 | 45/79 | 105/171 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 66% | 57% | 61% | |
1st pts | 24/27 | 23/33 | 31/45 | 78/105 | |
% 1st pts | 89% | 70% | 69% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 12/15 | 13/17 | 19/34 | 44/66 | |
% 2nd pts | 80% | 76% | 56% | 67% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
Converted | 3/11 | 4/8 | 4/12 | 11/31 | |
Converted % | 27% | 50% | 33% | 35% | |
Conceded | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 4/4 | 4/7 | 8 | |
Saved % | – | 100% | 57% | 52% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Cachin | |||||
R1 Barrere |
R2 Nagal |
1/4 Elahi Galan Riveros |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 7-5 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 22 | 20 | 61 | |
pts | 61-47 | 79-69 | 65-58 | 205-174 | |
Total points | 108 | 148 | 123 | 379 | |
Winners | 31 | 29 | 28 | 88 | |
%Winners | 51% | 37% | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 7 | 3 | 6 | 16 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
1st in | 38/59 | 43/74 | 45/66 | 126/199 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 58% | 68% | 63% | |
1st pts | 31/38 | 29/43 | 28/45 | 88/126 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 67% | 62% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 13/21 | 17/31 | 13/21 | 43/73 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 55% | 62% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 4/14 | 4/6 | 10/23 | |
Converted % | 67% | 29% | 67% | 43% | |
Conceded | 4 | 10 | 5 | 19 | |
Saved | 4/4 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 15 | |
Saved % | 100% | 80% | 60% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Braunschweig Challenger
- Pedro CachinCachin – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Cristian GarinGarin (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Henri SquireSquire (7-5 7-62) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Cristian GarinGarin (4-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Henri SquireSquire (7-5 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Pedro CachinCachin (1-0) – H2H and prediction