Benjamin Bonzi and Philip Sekulic will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Winnipeg Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Benjamin Bonzi who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Benjamin Bonzi is the pick to win this match.
Benjamin Bonzi -> 1.37
Philip Sekulic -> 2.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Benjamin Bonzi vs. Philip Sekulic
This will be the 2nd time that Benjamin Bonzi and Philip Sekulic square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Bonzi (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Bonzi won 6-3 6-2 in the 1st round in the Bengaluru Challenger back in February 2024.
Benjamin Bonzi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-17 | 9-7 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 50-32 | 13-13 | 7-10 | 24-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-26 | 10-8 | 2-4 | 17-11 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-27 | 7-10 | 9-5 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 57-27 | 23-5 | 7-7 | 20-13 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 150, Benjamin reached the 2nd round after defeating Ethan Quinn 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Benjamin had a good straight sets win against Quinn (6-4 6-4). During the match, Bonzi scored 68 points vs Quinn’s 53. Bonzi was pretty aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Bonzi recorded 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Benjamin Bonzi was quite efficient on serve to win 86% (18/21) of his 1st serve and 58% (19/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The French player was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Quinn 4 times.
Bonzi has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 60% of his matches (336-223). 4-6 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Bonzi has a compiled101-52 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
Benjamin’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Split Challenger and the Ilkley Challenger.
Benjamin has a composed 17-22 win-loss record in 2024, 4-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Winnipeg Challenger
Philip Sekulic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 35-31 | 34-26 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-28 | 33-24 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-23 | 19-15 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-3 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 241, the Australian reached the 2nd round after defeating Mark Lajal 7-5 4-6 6-3 and Benjamin Bonzi .
In the 1st round, Sekulic defeated Lajal (7-5 4-6 6-3). During the match Sekulic scored 114 points vs Lajal’s 105. The Australian was very aggressive to blast 48 winners.
About the serving games, Sekulic managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Philip Sekulic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Sekulic put 65% of his first serves in, winning 73% (48/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (16/35) on the 2nd serve. Sekulic broke Lajal 4 times after converting 22% of his break points (4/18).
Philip’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Wuxi Challenger and the Kachreti Challenger.
The Australian has a composed 20-19 win-loss record in 2024, 20-15 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Winnipeg Challenger
Philip has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bonzi | Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 31 |
| Pts | 68-53 | 114-105 |
| Total Points | 121 | 219 |
| Winners | 18 | 48 |
| %Winners | 26% | 42% |
Both Bonzi and Sekulic played 1 match. At the moment, Philip Sekulic lost 1 set while Benjamin Bonzi hasn’t dropped a set so far. Bonzi has played 1 set(s) less than Sekulic (2 vs 3). Therefore, Bonzi played 11 games less than Sekulic. Bonzi scored 18 winners (26% of the total points). On the other side, Sekulic recorded 48 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bonzi | Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 3 |
| 1st in | 21/54 | 66/101 |
| %1st in | 39% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 18/21 | 48/66 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 19/33 | 16/35 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 46% |
Bonzi made 7 aces . Sekulic blasted 3 aces . Bonzi won 86% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Sekulic won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bonzi | Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/18 |
| % Converted | 100% | 22% |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Benjamin broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 22% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Bonzi | |||
| R1 Quinn |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 68-53 | 68-53 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 21/54 | 21/54 | |
| % 1st in | 39% | 39% | |
| 1st pts | 18/21 | 18/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/33 | 19/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Sekulic | |||
| R1 Lajal |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 114-105 | 114-105 | |
| Total points | 219 | 219 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 66/101 | 66/101 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 48/66 | 48/66 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/35 | 16/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/18 | 4/18 | |
| Converted % | 22% | 22% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLLLW
LL Tennis Scores in Winnipeg Challenger
- Jeff WolfWolf – Arthur GeaGea (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Aidan MayoMayo (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri – Keegan RiceRice (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Vasek PospisilPospisil (3-6 7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Ryan PenistonPeniston (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy (5-7 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine BellierBellier – Tristan BoyerBoyer (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Andres MartinMartin (7-5 6-77 6-1) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Mark LajalLajal (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-2 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Vasek PospisilPospisil (3-6 7-6(2) 6-2) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Andres MartinMartin (7-5 6-7(7) 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine BellierBellier – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Terence AtmaneAtmane (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Hady HabibHabib (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
