Yanaki Milev and Stijn Slump will play each other in the qualifications of the Braunschweig Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yanaki Milev who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yanaki Milev is the pick to win this match.
Yanaki Milev -> 1.51
Stijn Slump -> 2.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yanaki Milev vs. Stijn Slump
This will be the 3rd time that Yanaki Milev and Stijn Slump face off. The head to head is 1-1 for Milev and Slump (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Milev won 5-7 6-4 6-2 in the semifinal in M15 Antalya back in April 2024.
Yanaki Milev
30 - 17win/loss
486
443
LWLLWWLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-26 | 0-1 | 39-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-26 | 0-0 | 35-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-15 | 4-3 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 477 (career-high), Milev got to the qualifications after defeating Franco Agamenone 4-6 6-1 7-5 and Stijn Slump .
In the qualifications against Agamenone, The Bulgarian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-1 7-5). During the match, Milev scored 93 points vs Agamenone’s 75. The Bulgarian was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Milev scored 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Yanaki Milev was extremely efficient on serve to win 85% (39/46) of his 1st serve and 53% (19/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Bulgarian broke Agamenone 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Milev has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 59% of his matches (88-60). 30-14 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Milev has a compiled83-52 win-loss record in the last 5 years on clay.
Milev’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Antalya and M15 Kursumlijska Banja.
The Bulgarian has a compiled 30-16 win-loss record in 2024, 30-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Stijn Slump
37 - 13win/loss
533
518
LLWLWWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 46-22 | 5-3 | 41-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-17 | 10-5 | 16-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-12 | 1-1 | 22-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 607 (career-high), the Dutch got to the qualifications after beating Ivan Liutarevich 6-4 2-6 6-0.
In the qualifications, Stijn defeated Liutarevich (6-4 2-6 6-0). During the match Slump scored 77 points vs Liutarevich’s 62. The Dutch was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Slump managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Stijn Slump lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Slump put 54% of his first serves in, winning 79% (30/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (15/32) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Liutarevich 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The Dutch’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Antalya and M15 Casablanca.
The Dutch has a compiled 36-13 win-loss record in 2024, 31-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Slump has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Milev | Slump |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 24 |
| Pts | 93-75 | 77-62 |
| Total Points | 168 | 139 |
| Winners | 39 | 30 |
| %Winners | 42% | 39% |
Both Milev and Slump played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Yanaki Milev dropped 1 set, while Stijn Slump dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Milev and Slump have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Milev played 5 games more than Slump. The Bulgarian scored 39 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch recorded 30 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Milev | Slump |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 46/82 | 38/70 |
| %1st in | 56% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 39/46 | 30/38 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 15/32 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 47% |
Milev blasted 3 aces . Slump struck 4 aces . Milev won 85% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Slump won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Milev | Slump |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 67% | 56% |
| Conceded | 5 | 8 |
| Saved | 3 | 5 |
| % Saved | 60% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
Yanaki broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Yanaki conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Slump broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Milev | |||
| Q1 Agamenone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 93-75 | 93-75 | |
| Total points | 168 | 168 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 46/82 | 46/82 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 39/46 | 39/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/36 | 19/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Slump | |||
| Q1 Liutarevich |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 2-6 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 77-62 | 77-62 | |
| Total points | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 38/70 | 38/70 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 30/38 | 30/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/32 | 15/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLWLW
LLWLWWWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Sumit NagalNagal (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Nicola KuhnKuhn (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Jozef KovalikKovalik (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Daniel MasurMasur (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
