James Kent Trotter and Quinn Vandecasteele will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Winnipeg Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Kent Trotter who should win in 3 sets.
James Kent Trotter -> 1.48
Quinn Vandecasteele -> 2.53
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head James Kent Trotter vs. Quinn Vandecasteele
There is no head to head record between James Kent Trotter and Quinn Vandecasteele since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
James Kent Trotter
20 - 13win/loss
323
272
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-15 | 15-8 | 1-3 | 6-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 283, James reached the qualifications after beating James Tracy 6-3 6-4 and Quinn Vandecasteele .
In the qualifications, Kent Trotter had a good straight sets win against Tracy (6-3 6-4). During the match, Kent Trotter scored 59 points vs Tracy’s 46. The Japanese was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kent Trotter recorded 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. James Kent Trotter was quite effective on serve to win 88% (28/32) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Japanese was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Tracy twice.
Kent Trotter has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 58% of his matches (68-49). 12-7 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Kent Trotter has a compiled45-29 record in the last 7 years on hard.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Tyler Challenger where he defeated Brandon Holt in the final 6-2 7-6(3).
The Japanese has a composed 19-13 win-loss record in 2024, 12-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Winnipeg Challenger
Quinn Vandecasteele
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-9 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 588, will start his run in the Winnipeg Challenger after he played his last match in the Winnipeg Challenger where he defeated 7-5 6-3 to Glinka in the qualifications on the 7th of July.
Quinn has an aggregate 10-7 win-loss record in 2024, 8-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
In terms of his career, The American has an overall 55-38 record. He has a positive 47-32 record on hard.
Previously in the Winnipeg Challenger
Vandecasteele has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kent Trotter | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 21 |
| Pts | 59-46 | 67-46 |
| Total Points | 105 | 113 |
| Winners | 28 | 19 |
| %Winners | 47% | 28% |
Both Kent Trotter and Vandecasteele played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Kent Trotter and Vandecasteele have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Kent Trotter played 2 games less than Vandecasteele. James scored 28 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Vandecasteele made 19 winners (28%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kent Trotter | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 4 |
| 1st in | 32/58 | 28/55 |
| %1st in | 55% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 28/32 | 19/28 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/27 |
| %2nd pts | 58% | 56% |
Kent Trotter fired 6 aces . Vandecasteele managed to score 4 aces . Kent Trotter won 88% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, Vandecasteele won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kent Trotter | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 6 |
| Converted | 2/2 | 6/7 |
| % Converted | 100% | 86% |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The Japanese broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. The Japanese had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 2 break points. The American broke his opponent 6 times with a 86% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kent Trotter | |||
| Q1 Tracy | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 59-46 | 59-46 | |
| Total points | 105 | 105 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 32/58 | 32/58 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 28/32 | 28/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Vandecasteele | |||
| Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | |||
| Tot Set | 0 | ||
| Tot Games | 0 | ||
| pts | 0-0 | ||
| Total points | 0 | ||
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | ||
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | ||
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st in | 0% | ||
| 1st pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st pts | 0% | ||
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 0% | ||
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | 0/0 | ||
| Converted % | 0% | ||
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0 | ||
| Saved % | 0% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kody PearsonPearson – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Antoine BellierBellier (0-0) – H2H and prediction