Learner Tien and Nishesh Basavareddy will face off in the final of the Bloomfield Hills Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 1:00 pm on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nishesh Basavareddy who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nishesh Basavareddy is the pick to win this match.
Nishesh Basavareddy -> 1.74
Learner Tien -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Learner Tien vs. Nishesh Basavareddy
There is no head to head record between Learner Tien and Nishesh Basavareddy since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Learner Tien
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 63-14 | 53-8 | 0-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-10 | 20-10 | 0-0 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 8-5 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 342 (career-high), Tien reached the final after beating James Kent Trotter 4-6 6-3 6-3, Bu Yunchaokete 0-6 7-5 6-0, Philip Sekulic 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 and Ryan Seggerman 6-1 4-6 6-4.
In the semifinal, Tien defeated Seggerman (6-1 4-6 6-4). During the match, Tien scored 82 points vs Seggerman’s 66. The American was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Tien made 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Learner Tien was quite effective on serve to win 78% (29/37) of his 1st serve and 67% (24/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Learner broke Seggerman 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has conceded 4 set in this competition to win 53% of the points he played.
Tien has a fantastic match record in the last 3 years having won 73% of his matches (65-24). 23-2 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Tien has an overall51-17 win-loss record in the last 3 years on hard.
Learner’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 San Diego and M15 Rancho Santa Fe.
Learner has an aggregate 23-3 win-loss record in 2024, 23-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Tien has never competed in this tournament before.
Nishesh Basavareddy
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 49-18 | 34-11 | 0-0 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-6 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 366 (career-high), Nishesh got to the final after defeating Marc Polmans 6-4 6-2, Antoine Bellier 6-3 4-6 6-2, Bernard Tomic 6-4 ret., Stefan Kozlov 6-2 2-0 ret. and Learner Tien .
In the semifinal against Kozlov, the American had a free pass after Kozlov retired on a 6-2 2-0 . scoreline.
Nishesh’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Calabasas.
Basavareddy has a compiled 12-3 win-loss record in 2024, 12-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tien | Basavareddy |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 12 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 111 | 65 |
| Pts | 371-326 | 240-173 |
| Total Points | 697 | 413 |
| Winners | 143 | 92 |
| %Winners | 39% | 38% |
Both Tien and Basavareddy played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Learner Tien conceded 4 sets, while Nishesh Basavareddy surrendered 1 set. Tien has played 2 sets more than Basavareddy (12 vs 10). Therefore, Tien played 46 games more than Basavareddy. Tien scored 143 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Basavareddy struck 92 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tien | Basavareddy |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 207/354 | 119/190 |
| %1st in | 58% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 143/207 | 92/119 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 75/147 | 48/71 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 68% |
Tien fired 16 aces (4 per match). Basavareddy made 12 aces (3 per match). Tien won 69% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Basavareddy won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tien | Basavareddy |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 20 | 11 |
| Converted | 20/30 | 11/27 |
| % Converted | 67% | 41% |
| Conceded | 27 | 16 |
| Saved | 12 | 14 |
| % Saved | 44% | 88% |
| Times Broken | 15 | 2 |
Learner broke his opponents 20 times with a 67% conversion rate. Learner conceded his serve 15 times and he saved 44% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 11 times with a 41% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve twice and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tien | ||||||
| R1 Kent |
R2 Yunchaokete |
1/4 Sekulic |
1/2 Seggerman |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | 0-6 7-5 6-0 | 4-6 7-64 6-3 | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 24 | 32 | 27 | 111 | |
| pts | 95-82 | 88-86 | 106-92 | 82-66 | 371-326 | |
| Total points | 177 | 174 | 198 | 148 | 697 | |
| Winners | 29 | 42 | 43 | 29 | 143 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 48% | 41% | 35% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 2 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 45/78 | 64/103 | 61/100 | 37/73 | 207/354 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 62% | 61% | 51% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 29/45 | 42/64 | 43/61 | 29/37 | 143/207 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 66% | 70% | 78% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/33 | 15/39 | 22/39 | 24/36 | 75/147 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 38% | 56% | 67% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 8 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 20 | |
| Converted | 8/14 | 5/7 | 3/3 | 4/6 | 20/30 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 71% | 100% | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 27 | |
| Saved | 1/7 | 8/12 | 3/6 | 0/2 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 14% | 67% | 50% | 0% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 15 | |
| Basavareddy | ||||||
| R1 Polmans |
R2 Bellier |
1/4 Tomic |
1/2 Kozlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | 6-4 ret. | 6-2 2-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 27 | 10 | 10 | 65 | |
| pts | 62-46 | 90-63 | 43-38 | 45-26 | 240-173 | |
| Total points | 108 | 153 | 81 | 71 | 413 | |
| Winners | 23 | 36 | 15 | 18 | 92 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 40% | 35% | 40% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 3 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 30/52 | 45/72 | 19/29 | 25/37 | 119/190 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 63% | 66% | 68% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 36/45 | 15/19 | 18/25 | 92/119 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 80% | 79% | 72% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/22 | 21/27 | 4/10 | 7/12 | 48/71 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 78% | 40% | 58% | 68% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/8 | 2/9 | 3/3 | 11/27 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 38% | 22% | 100% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 16 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3/4 | 2/3 | 6/6 | 14 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 75% | 67% | 100% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWWW
LWLWWWWWLW 
