Learner Tien and Ryan Seggerman will square off in the semifinal of the Bloomfield Hills Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 12:00 pm on STADIUM. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Learner Tien who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Learner Tien is the pick to win this match.
Learner Tien -> 1.444
Ryan Seggerman -> 2.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Learner Tien vs. Ryan Seggerman
This will be the 2nd time that Learner Tien and Ryan Seggerman play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Seggerman (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Seggerman won 6-3 6-4 in the quarter in M15 San Diego back in 2022.
Learner Tien
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 48-8 | 48-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-10 | 20-10 | 0-0 | 10-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-11 | 8-5 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 342 (career-high), the American got to the semifinal after defeating James Kent Trotter 4-6 6-3 6-3, Bu Yunchaokete 0-6 7-5 6-0 and Philip Sekulic 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3.
In the quarter against Sekulic, Learner recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-64 6-3). During the match, Tien scored 106 points vs Sekulic’s 92. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tien struck 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Learner Tien lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Tien put 61% of his first serves in, winning 70% (43/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (22/39) on the 2nd serve. Tien was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Sekulic 3 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has surrendered 3 set in this competition to win 53% of the points he played.
Tien has a fantastic match record in the last 3 years having won 73% of his matches (64-24). 22-2 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Tien has an aggregate50-17 win-loss record in the last 3 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 San Diego and M15 Rancho Santa Fe.
Learner has a compiled 22-3 win-loss record in 2024, 22-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Tien has never competed in this tournament before.
Ryan Seggerman
16 - 11win/loss
392
348
LLWLWLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-18 | 12-9 | 12-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 475, Seggerman reached the semifinal after beating Adam Neff 4-6 6-4 6-4, Strong Kirchheimer 6-2 6-3, Kaichi Uchida 7-6(3) 6-1, Ernesto Escobedo 6-4 6-2, Gijs Brouwer 6-4 6-4 and Learner Tien .
In the quarter, The American had a good straight sets win against Brouwer (6-4 6-4). During the match Seggerman scored 67 points vs Brouwer’s 54. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Seggerman scored 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ryan Seggerman was extremely efficient on serve to win 91% (31/34) of his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Seggerman broke Brouwer twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Seggerman started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Ryan’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Skopje Challenger.
Seggerman has a compiled 16-10 win-loss record in 2024, 9-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tien | Seggerman |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 11 |
| Tot Games | 84 | 105 |
| Pts | 289-260 | 353-290 |
| Total Points | 549 | 643 |
| Winners | 114 | 158 |
| %Winners | 39% | 45% |
Tien played 3 matches while Seggerman competed in 5 matches. Seggerman started his run from the qualifications while Tien had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Learner Tien dropped 3 sets, while Ryan Seggerman lost 1 set. Tien has played 2 set(s) less than Seggerman (9 vs 11). Therefore, Tien played 21 games less than Seggerman. Tien scored 114 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 158 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tien | Seggerman |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 57 |
| Avg per match | 4.7 | 11.4 |
| 1st in | 170/281 | 199/320 |
| %1st in | 60% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 114/170 | 158/199 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 51/111 | 70/121 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 58% |
Tien struck 14 aces (4.7 per match). Seggerman fired 57 aces (11.4 per match). Tien won 67% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Seggerman won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tien | Seggerman |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 16 | 13 |
| Converted | 16/24 | 13/32 |
| % Converted | 67% | 41% |
| Conceded | 25 | 13 |
| Saved | 12 | 12 |
| % Saved | 48% | 92% |
| Times Broken | 13 | 1 |
The American broke his opponents 16 times with a 67% conversion rate. Learner surrendered his serve 13 times and he saved 48% of the break points that he conceded. Ryan broke his opponents 13 times with a 41% conversion rate. Seggerman conceded his serve once and he saved 92% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tien | |||||
| R1 Kent |
R2 Yunchaokete |
1/4 Sekulic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | 0-6 7-5 6-0 | 4-6 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 24 | 32 | 84 | |
| pts | 95-82 | 88-86 | 106-92 | 289-260 | |
| Total points | 177 | 174 | 198 | 549 | |
| Winners | 29 | 42 | 43 | 114 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 48% | 41% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 6 | 6 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 6 | 5 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 45/78 | 64/103 | 61/100 | 170/281 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 62% | 61% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 29/45 | 42/64 | 43/61 | 114/170 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 66% | 70% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/33 | 15/39 | 22/39 | 51/111 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 38% | 56% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 8 | 5 | 3 | 16 | |
| Converted | 8/14 | 5/7 | 3/3 | 16/24 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 71% | 100% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 12 | 6 | 25 | |
| Saved | 1/7 | 8/12 | 3/6 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 14% | 67% | 50% | 44% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 4 | 3 | 13 | |
| Seggerman | |||||||
| Q1 Neff |
Q3 Kirchheimer |
R1 Uchida |
R2 Escobedo |
1/4 Brouwer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | 6-2 6-3 | 7-63 6-1 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 17 | 20 | 18 | 20 | 105 | |
| pts | 89-86 | 67-50 | 70-55 | 60-45 | 67-54 | 353-290 | |
| Total points | 175 | 117 | 125 | 105 | 121 | 643 | |
| Winners | 44 | 21 | 35 | 27 | 31 | 158 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 31% | 50% | 45% | 46% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 13 | 3 | 19 | 10 | 12 | 57 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 61/97 | 29/58 | 40/66 | 35/50 | 34/49 | 199/320 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 50% | 61% | 70% | 69% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 44/61 | 21/29 | 35/40 | 27/35 | 31/34 | 158/199 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | 88% | 77% | 91% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/36 | 17/29 | 12/26 | 10/15 | 9/15 | 70/121 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 59% | 46% | 67% | 60% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 13 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 4/13 | 2/2 | 3/5 | 2/9 | 13/32 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 31% | 100% | 60% | 22% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 3/3 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 12 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 100% | 100% | 100% | – | 129% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLWWWWWW
LLWLWLLWWW Tennis Scores in Bloomfield Hills Challenger
- Ryan Seggerman/Patrik TrhacSeggerman/Patrik Trhac – Tristan Boyer/Dennis NovikovBoyer/Dennis Novikov (7-5 7-68) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
