Jonas Forejtek and Olaf Pieczkowski will face off in the 2nd round of the Troyes Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:00 pm on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jonas Forejtek who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jonas Forejtek is the pick to win this match.
Jonas Forejtek -> 1.285
Olaf Pieczkowski -> 3.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jonas Forejtek vs. Olaf Pieczkowski
There is no head to head record between Jonas Forejtek and Olaf Pieczkowski since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jonas Forejtek
26 - 17win/loss
361
217
LLWLLLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-27 | 5-4 | 23-20 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-21 | 0-3 | 17-10 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 32-24 | 3-2 | 14-11 | 14-9 | 0-1 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 35-31 | 2-2 | 13-18 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2020 | 20-11 | 2-3 | 13-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 352, the Czech reached the 2nd round after defeating Tristan Lamasine 7-65 6-3.
In the 1st round, Jonas had a good straight sets win against Lamasine (7-65 6-3). During the match, Forejtek scored 72 points vs Lamasine’s 65. The Czech was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Forejtek fired 2 aces and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults. Jonas Forejtek lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Forejtek put 59% of his first serves in, winning 68% (28/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the 2nd serve. Forejtek broke Lamasine twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Forejtek has a winning match record in the last 7 years having won 57% of his matches (162-120). 13-10 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Forejtek has a compiled84-62 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
The Czech’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Esch/Alzette.
Forejtek has a compiled 26-17 win-loss record in 2024, 13-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Troyes Challenger
The Czech has never competed in this tournament before.
Olaf Pieczkowski
15 - 15win/loss
607
493
LWWWLLWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-27 | 17-14 | 16-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-23 | 23-10 | 12-9 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-14 | 9-11 | 6-3 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 549, Olaf reached the 2nd round after defeating Thijmen Loof 6-3 6-4, Damien Wenger 7-67 6-0 and Corentin Denolly 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Pole had a good straight sets win against Denolly (6-3 6-4). During the match Pieczkowski scored 66 points vs Denolly’s 51. Pieczkowski was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Pieczkowski scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Olaf Pieczkowski lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Pieczkowski put 66% of his first serves in, winning 74% (26/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (7/18) on the 2nd serve. Pieczkowski broke Denolly 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Pieczkowski’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Sharm ElSheikh.
The Pole has an overall 15-15 win-loss record in 2024, 4-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Forejtek | Pieczkowski |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 57 |
| Pts | 72-65 | 198-149 |
| Total Points | 137 | 347 |
| Winners | 28 | 82 |
| %Winners | 39% | 41% |
Forejtek played 1 match while Pieczkowski competed in 3 matches. Pieczkowski started his run from the qualifications while Forejtek had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Forejtek has played 4 set(s) less than Pieczkowski (2 vs 6). Therefore, Forejtek played 35 games less than Pieczkowski. Forejtek scored 28 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Olaf fired 82 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Forejtek | Pieczkowski |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 1.7 |
| 1st in | 41/70 | 110/161 |
| %1st in | 59% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 28/41 | 82/110 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 26/51 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 51% |
Forejtek blasted 2 aces . Pieczkowski blasted 5 aces (1.7 per match). Forejtek won 68% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Pieczkowski won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Forejtek | Pieczkowski |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 14 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 14/31 |
| % Converted | 50% | 45% |
| Conceded | 2 | 14 |
| Saved | 1 | 8 |
| % Saved | 50% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 |
The Czech broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Forejtek dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Pieczkowski broke his opponents 14 times with a 45% conversion rate. Olaf conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Forejtek | |||
| R1 Lamasine |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 72-65 | 72-65 | |
| Total points | 137 | 137 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 41/70 | 41/70 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 28/41 | 28/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/29 | 16/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Pieczkowski | |||||
| Q1 Loof |
Q3 Wenger |
R1 Denolly |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 7-67 6-0 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | 19 | 57 | |
| pts | 65-48 | 67-50 | 66-51 | 198-149 | |
| Total points | 113 | 117 | 117 | 347 | |
| Winners | 24 | 32 | 26 | 82 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 48% | 39% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 6 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 32/47 | 43/61 | 35/53 | 110/161 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 70% | 66% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 32/43 | 26/35 | 82/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 74% | 74% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/15 | 8/18 | 7/18 | 26/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 44% | 39% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 5/9 | 5/12 | 14/31 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 56% | 42% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 | 4 | 14 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 5/7 | 1/4 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 71% | 25% | 163% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLLWLWW
LWWWLLWWWL Tennis Scores in Troyes Challenger
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (4-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Maxence RivetRivet (3-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Constantin Bittoun KouzmineBittoun Kouzmine (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Carlos Lopez MontagudLopez Montagud (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Mika BrunoldBrunold (6-1 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Lilian MarmousezMarmousez – Sandro KoppKopp (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-4 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Vadym UrsuUrsu (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Calvin HemeryHemery (7-5 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Olaf PieczkowskiPieczkowski – Corentin DenollyDenolly (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Neil Oberleitner/Jakub PaulOberleitner/Jakub Paul – Zvonimir Babic/Hazem NaowBabic/Hazem Naow (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Hazem NaowNaow – Elmer MollerMoller (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Maxence BeaugeBeauge (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Tristan LamasineLamasine (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Khumoun SultanovSultanov – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (3-6 7-6(4) 6-2) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Constantin Bittoun KouzmineBittoun Kouzmine (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Mika BrunoldBrunold (6-1 6-7(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Mathys ErhardErhard – Maxence RivetRivet (3-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Abel Hernandez-AguilaHernandez-Aguila (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Carlos Lopez MontagudLopez Montagud (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Lilian MarmousezMarmousez – Sandro KoppKopp (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (4-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Hazem NaowNaow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Khumoun SultanovSultanov – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Mathys ErhardErhard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lilian MarmousezMarmousez – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-1) – H2H and prediction
