Ryan Seggerman and Strong Kirchheimer will face off in the qualifications of the Bloomfield Hills Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ryan Seggerman who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ryan Seggerman is the pick to win this match.
Ryan Seggerman -> 1.68
Strong Kirchheimer -> 2.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ryan Seggerman vs. Strong Kirchheimer
There is no head to head record between Ryan Seggerman and Strong Kirchheimer since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Ryan Seggerman
13 - 10win/loss
475
463
WWLWLLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-10 | 6-4 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 475, the American reached the qualifications after beating Adam Neff 4-6 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications against Neff, Ryan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-4). During the match, Seggerman scored 89 points vs Neff’s 86. Seggerman was pretty aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Seggerman blasted 13 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Ryan Seggerman was very efficient on serve to win 72% (44/61) of his 1st serve and 61% (22/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Neff twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Seggerman has a solid win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 64% of his matches (46-26). 5-4 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Seggerman has a composed35-18 win-loss record in the last 3 years on hard.
Ryan’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Skopje Challenger.
Seggerman has a composed 12-10 win-loss record in 2024, 5-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Ryan has never competed in this tournament before.
Strong Kirchheimer
13 - 16win/loss
498
375
LWLWLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-16 | 9-8 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 19-16 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-30 | 17-12 | 7-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 12-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 498, Kirchheimer reached the qualifications after defeating Axel Nefve 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Nefve (6-2 6-3). During the match Kirchheimer scored 59 points vs Nefve’s 35. Kirchheimer was quite aggressive to blast 17 winners.
About the serving games, Kirchheimer fired 6 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Strong Kirchheimer was extremely efficient on serve to win 77% (17/22) of his 1st serve and 83% (15/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Strong broke Nefve 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Kirchheimer’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 San Diego.
The American has a composed 13-15 win-loss record in 2024, 9-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Seggerman | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 17 |
| Pts | 89-86 | 59-35 |
| Total Points | 175 | 94 |
| Winners | 44 | 17 |
| %Winners | 49% | 29% |
Both Seggerman and Kirchheimer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Ryan Seggerman lost 1 set while Strong Kirchheimer hasn’t lost a set so far. Seggerman has played 1 set more than Kirchheimer (3 vs 2). Therefore, Seggerman played 13 games more than Kirchheimer. Seggerman scored 44 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Kirchheimer struck 17 winners (29%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Seggerman | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 6 |
| 1st in | 61/97 | 22/40 |
| %1st in | 63% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 44/61 | 17/22 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 22/36 | 15/18 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 83% |
Seggerman bagged 13 aces . Kirchheimer struck 6 aces . Seggerman won 72% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Kirchheimer won 77% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 83% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Seggerman | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 67% | 44% |
| Conceded | 8 | 0 |
| Saved | 7 | 0 |
| % Saved | 88% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. The American surrendered his serve once and he saved 88% of the break points that he conceded. Kirchheimer broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Seggerman | |||
| Q1 Neff |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 89-86 | 89-86 | |
| Total points | 175 | 175 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 61/97 | 61/97 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 44/61 | 44/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/36 | 22/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kirchheimer | |||
| Q1 Nefve |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 59-35 | 59-35 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 22/40 | 22/40 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 17/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/18 | 15/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 83% | 83% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWLLLWWW
LWLWLWWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Enzo WallartWallart (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – William GrantGrant (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Matt KuharKuhar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine BellierBellier – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
