![Prediction And Head To Head Sebastian Ofner Vs. Paul Jubb Zgtjxxlk0o Prediction and head to head Sebastian Ofner vs. Paul Jubb](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Sebastian-Ofner-vs.-Paul-Jubb-ZgTjxXlK0O.jpg)
Sebastian Ofner and Paul Jubb will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Mallorca Championships for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 6:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sebastian Ofner who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sebastian Ofner is the pick to win this match.
Sebastian Ofner -> 1.66
Paul Jubb -> 2.23
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sebastian Ofner vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Sebastian Ofner and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Sebastian Ofner
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Sebastian Ofner](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Sebastian-Ofner.jpg)
17 - 19win/loss
54
37
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-19 | 6-7 | 7-10 | 1-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 60-31 | 12-10 | 37-13 | 7-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 28-18 | 4-4 | 21-12 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-24 | 4-6 | 4-8 | 7-6 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 15-17 | 3-5 | 7-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 54, Ofner reached the semifinal after defeating Jaume Antoni Munar Clar 3-6 6-4 7-64, Luciano Darderi 6-3 7-5 and Alex Michelsen 3-6 7-5 6-3.
In the quarter against Michelsen, The Austrian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 6-3).During the match, Ofner scored less points (4) than Michelsen. In fact, the world no. 54 won 90 points vs Michelsen’s. That means that Ofner was more focused during the important points. The Austrian was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ofner made 12 aces and he was not very steady on his 2nd serve to score 10 double faults. Sebastian Ofner lost the serve once and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Ofner put 50% of his first serves in, winning 79% (41/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (25/51) on the 2nd serve. Sebastian broke Michelsen twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Austrian has surrendered 2 set in this competition to win 51% of the points he played.
Ofner has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 58% of his matches (314-232). 3-2 on grass in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ofner has an aggregate25-16 record in the last 9 years on grass.
Ofner’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in Hong Kong.
Ofner has a composed 17-19 win-loss record in 2024, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Mallorca
Ofner has never competed in this tournament before.
Paul Jubb
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Paul Jubb](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/7747Paul-Jubb.jpg)
38 - 16win/loss
289
196
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 38-16 | 20-7 | 0-2 | 9-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 289, Paul got to the semifinal after defeating Joan Nadal 6-1 6-2, Thiago Moura Monteiro 6-3 6-4, Maximilian Marterer 6-1 6-2, Adam Walton 6-0 6-3 and Ben Shelton 6-3 3-6 7-68.
In the quarter, Paul defeated Shelton (6-3 3-6 7-68). During the match Jubb scored 125 points vs Shelton’s 120. Jubb was quite aggressive to blast 54 winners.
About the serving games, Jubb scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 61% of his first serves in, winning 76% (54/71) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (19/45) on the 2nd serve. Jubb broke Shelton 3 times after converting 17% of his break points (3/18).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Paul started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Jubb’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Glasgow Challenger and M25 Nottingham.
Paul has an aggregate 38-16 win-loss record in 2024, 9-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ofner | Jubb |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 5 |
Tot Set | 8 | 11 |
Tot Games | 83 | 95 |
Pts | 253-245 | 365-271 |
Total Points | 498 | 636 |
Winners | 109 | 147 |
%Winners | 43% | 40% |
Ofner played 3 matches while Jubb competed in 5 matches. Jubb started his run from the qualifications while Ofner had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Sebastian Ofner conceded 2 sets, while Paul Jubb surrendered 1 set. Ofner has played 3 set(s) less than Jubb (8 vs 11). Therefore, Ofner played 12 games less than Jubb. Ofner scored 109 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit blasted 147 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ofner | Jubb |
---|---|---|
Aces | 41 | 24 |
Avg per match | 13.7 | 4.8 |
1st in | 135/260 | 175/293 |
%1st in | 52% | 60% |
1st pts | 109/135 | 147/175 |
%1st pts | 81% | 84% |
2nd pts | 64/125 | 60/118 |
%2nd pts | 51% | 51% |
Ofner made 41 aces (13.7 per match). Jubb managed to score 24 aces (4.8 per match). Ofner won 81% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ofner | Jubb |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 19 |
Converted | 8/14 | 19/50 |
% Converted | 57% | 38% |
Conceded | 22 | 17 |
Saved | 17 | 13 |
% Saved | 77% | 76% |
Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
Ofner broke his opponents 8 times with a 57% conversion rate. Sebastian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded. Paul broke his opponents 19 times with a 38% conversion rate. Jubb conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded.
Ofner | |||||
R1 Munar Clar |
R2 Darderi |
1/4 Michelsen |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-4 7-64 | 6-3 7-5 | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 21 | 30 | 83 | |
pts | 94-96 | 69-55 | 90-94 | 253-245 | |
Total points | 190 | 124 | 184 | 498 | |
Winners | 40 | 28 | 41 | 109 | |
%Winners | 43% | 41% | 46% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 15 | 14 | 12 | 41 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 1 | 10 | 16 | |
1st in | 50/90 | 33/67 | 52/103 | 135/260 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 49% | 50% | 52% | |
1st pts | 40/50 | 28/33 | 41/52 | 109/135 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 85% | 79% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 19/40 | 20/34 | 25/51 | 64/125 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 59% | 49% | 51% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 3/6 | 2/3 | 8/14 | |
Converted % | 60% | 50% | 67% | 57% | |
Conceded | 9 | 4 | 9 | 22 | |
Saved | 6/9 | 3/4 | 8/9 | 17 | |
Saved % | 67% | 75% | 89% | 77% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Jubb | |||||||
Q1 Nadal |
Q3 Moura Monteiro |
R1 Marterer |
R2 Walton |
1/4 Shelton |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-0 6-3 | 6-3 3-6 7-68 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 19 | 15 | 15 | 31 | 95 | |
pts | 63-37 | 58-45 | 67-42 | 52-27 | 125-120 | 365-271 | |
Total points | 100 | 103 | 109 | 79 | 245 | 636 | |
Winners | 19 | 29 | 21 | 24 | 54 | 147 | |
%Winners | 30% | 50% | 31% | 46% | 43% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 6 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 24 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 20 | |
1st in | 23/45 | 32/50 | 24/43 | 25/39 | 71/116 | 175/293 | |
% 1st in | 51% | 64% | 56% | 64% | 61% | 60% | |
1st pts | 19/23 | 29/32 | 21/24 | 24/25 | 54/71 | 147/175 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 91% | 88% | 96% | 76% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 15/22 | 8/18 | 10/19 | 8/14 | 19/45 | 60/118 | |
% 2nd pts | 68% | 44% | 53% | 57% | 42% | 51% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 19 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 3/7 | 5/11 | 4/6 | 3/18 | 19/50 | |
Converted % | 50% | 43% | 45% | 67% | 17% | 38% | |
Conceded | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 17 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 0/1 | 2/2 | 0/0 | 9/12 | 13 | |
Saved % | 100% | 0% | 100% | – | 75% | 92% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Mallorca
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Ben SheltonShelton (6-3 3-6 7-68) – See score progression
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (6-3 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Jakub MensikMensik (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Constantin Frantzen/Hendrik JebensFrantzen/Hendrik Jebens – Dustin Brown/Daniel MasurBrown/Daniel Masur (4-6 6-3 11-9) – See score progression
- Nathaniel Lammons/Jack WithrowLammons/Jack Withrow – Yuki Bhambri/Albano OlivettiBhambri/Albano Olivetti (7-621 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Gael MonfilsMonfils (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction